Choice of supply chain governance: Self-managing or outsourcing?

被引:25
|
作者
Lu, Qing [1 ]
Meng, Fanwen [2 ,3 ]
Goh, Mark [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Logist Inst Asia Pacific, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[2] Natl Healthcare Grp, Hlth Serv, Singapore 138543, Singapore
[3] Natl Healthcare Grp, Singapore 138543, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[5] RMIT Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Supply chain management; Outsourcing; Supplier governance; Knowledge transfer; Compliance effort; TRANSACTION COST; ORGANIZATION; KNOWLEDGE; MODEL; FIRM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.03.022
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As the outsourcing of key supplies and business processes becomes increasingly popular, the effective management of the outsourced business functions is of critical importance in supply chain management. Instead of managing all supply chain activities by themselves, many firms have chosen to transfer the governance of certain supply chain processes to third parties for lower cost and better service levels. This paper addresses the selection of the supply chain governance mode between self-managing and outsourcing from the perspective of the focal companies. To facilitate the decision-making process, we develop a model to investigate supply chain performance where knowledge transfer and compliance effort are two determinant factors. Mathematical properties related to the existence, uniqueness, and monotonicity of the model solution are derived. The results show that the optimal governance mode of the supply chain depends on the characteristics of the chain. Specifically, outsourcing to a third-party can function well only if the external coordinator can ensure low knowledge transfer cost along the supply chain. Self-managing by the focal company is preferred if the company can keep the cost of the compliance effort low. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 38
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Empowered and self-managing users in methadone treatment?
    Bjerge, Bagga
    Nielsen, Bjarke
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 17 (01) : 74 - 87
  • [32] YUGOSLAVIA - THE CASE OF SELF-MANAGING MARKET SOCIALISM
    ESTRIN, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1991, 5 (04): : 187 - 194
  • [33] An Architectural Approach for Self-Managing Security Services
    Russello, Giovanni
    Dulay, Naranker
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOPS: WAINA, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 153 - 158
  • [34] First workshop on the design of self-managing systems
    Spainhower, L
    van Moorsel, A
    [J]. 2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 765 - 765
  • [35] Policies for self-managing communities in agile organizations
    Feeney, Kevin C.
    Lewis, David
    Wade, Vincent
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FROM A BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE, 2007, : 104 - +
  • [36] Application of Self-managing Properties in Virtual Organizations
    Nami, Mohammad Reza
    Malekpour, Abbas
    [J]. CSA 2008: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 13 - +
  • [37] Self-Managing Database Capabilities in SQL Azure
    Kodavalla, Hanuma
    [J]. 2023 IEEE 39TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS, ICDEW, 2023, : 92 - 92
  • [38] Self-managing systems: A control theory foundation
    Diao, YX
    Hellerstein, JL
    Parekh, S
    Griffith, R
    Kaiser, G
    Phung, D
    [J]. 12TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOPS ON THE ENGINEERING OF COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 441 - 448
  • [39] Future Architecture and Mechanisms of the Self-Managing Internet
    Li Yhong
    [J]. ZTE Communications, 2010, 8 (02) : 21 - 25
  • [40] A self-managing addressing, naming and routing service
    Guruprasad, V
    [J]. 2002 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NETWORKED APPLIANCES, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 186 - 195