Renal Lesions: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted Imaging versus Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

被引:227
|
作者
Taouli, Bachir [1 ]
Thakur, Ravi K. [1 ]
Mannelli, Lorenzo [1 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ]
Kim, Sooah [1 ]
Hecht, Elizabeth M. [1 ]
Lee, Vivian S. [1 ]
Israel, Gary M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; ABDOMINAL ORGANS; HEPATIC-LESIONS; BRAIN; DIFFERENTIATION; GADOLINIUM; PERFUSION; COEFFICIENT; KIDNEY; REGION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2512080880
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of contrast material-enhanced (CE) MR imaging and to assess the performance of these examinations combined for the characterization of renal lesions, with MR follow-up and histopathologic analysis as the reference standards. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board waived the requirement of informed patient consent for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study. One hundred nine renal lesions in 64 patients (46 men, 18 women; mean age, 60.7 years) were evaluated with CE MR imaging and breath-hold DW imaging performed with various b values. Renal lesions were characterized with use of CE MR criteria, and apparent diffusion coefficients(ADCs) were measured. The ADCs of benign and malignant lesions were compared at Mann-Whitney testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of DW imaging and CE MR imaging in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Results: The 109 renal lesions-81 benign lesions and 28 RCCs had a mean diameter of 4.2 cm +/- 2.5 (standard deviation). The mean ADC for RCCs (1.41 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.61) was significantly lower (P < .0001) than that for benign lesions (2.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.87) at DW imaging performed with b values of 0, 400, and 800 sec/mm(2). At a cutoff ADC of less than or equal to 1.92 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of DW imaging for the diagnosis of RCCs (excluding angiomyolipomas) were 0.856, 86%, and 80%, respectively. The corresponding AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of CE MR imaging were 0.944, 100%, and 89%, respectively. Combined DW and CE MR imaging had 96% specificity. The AUC for the DW imaging-based diagnosis of solid RCC versus oncocytoma was 0.854. Papillary RCCs had lower ADCs than nonpapillary RCCs. Conclusion: DW imaging can be used to characterize renal lesions; however, compared with CE MR imaging, it is less accurate. DW imaging can be used to differentiate solid RCCs from oncocytomas and characterize the histologic subtypes of RCC. (C) BSNA, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 407
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection and characterization focal hepatic lesions with diffusion-weighted MR imaging
    Ali Kemal Sivrioglu
    Mehmet Ak
    Kemal Kara
    Mehmet Deveer
    [J]. Abdominal Imaging, 2013, 38 : 1182 - 1182
  • [32] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Renal and Adrenal Lesions
    Kilickesmez, Ozgur
    Inci, Ercan
    Atilla, Serhan
    Tasdelen, Neslihan
    Yetimoglu, Burcu
    Yencilek, Faruk
    Gurmen, Nevzat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2009, 33 (06) : 828 - 833
  • [33] The additive role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in preoperative staging of breast cancer
    Hashem, Lamiaa Mohamed Bassam
    Sawy, Yasmine Ahmed Elsayed
    Kamal, Rasha Mohamed
    Ahmed, Soha Mohamed
    Elmesidy, Dalia Salaheldin
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 52 (01):
  • [34] Contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T to assess aggressiveness of bladder cancer
    Zhou, Guoxing
    Chen, Xiao
    Zhang, Jianhua
    Zhu, Jingqi
    Zong, Genlin
    Wang, Zhongqiu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (11) : 2013 - 2018
  • [35] The additive role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in preoperative staging of breast cancer
    Lamiaa Mohamed Bassam Hashem
    Yasmine Ahmed Elsayed Sawy
    Rasha Mohamed Kamal
    Soha Mohamed Ahmed
    Dalia Salaheldin elmesidy
    [J]. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52
  • [36] The value of contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted MR imaging for distinguishing benign and malignant splenic masses
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Jang, Kyung Mi
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    Moon, Ji Yoon
    Choi, Yoon-Hyeong
    Lee, Bo Ra
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1063):
  • [37] Benefit of 3T Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Comparison to Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for the Evaluation of Disseminated Lesions in Primary Malignant Brain Tumors
    Kadota, Yoshihito
    Hirai, Toshinori
    Nakamura, Hideo
    Makino, Keishi
    Yano, Shigetoshi
    Nishimura, Shinichiro
    Tateishi, Machiko
    Azuma, Minako
    Kitajima, Mika
    Yamashita, Yasuyuki
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 16 (03) : 217 - 222
  • [38] Assessment of early therapeutic response to sorafenib in renal cell carcinoma xenografts by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging
    Jeon, T. Y.
    Kim, C. K.
    Kim, J-H
    Im, G. H.
    Park, B. K.
    Lee, J. H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1053):
  • [39] Renal masses: Characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging - A preliminary experience
    Zhang, Jingbo
    Tehrani, Yousef Mazaheri
    Wang, Liang
    Ishill, Nicole M.
    Schwartz, Larry H.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 247 (02) : 458 - 464
  • [40] Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Characterizing Musculoskeletal Lesions
    Subhawong, Ty K.
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Fayad, Laura M.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2014, 34 (05) : 1163 - 1177