Renal Lesions: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted Imaging versus Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

被引:227
|
作者
Taouli, Bachir [1 ]
Thakur, Ravi K. [1 ]
Mannelli, Lorenzo [1 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ]
Kim, Sooah [1 ]
Hecht, Elizabeth M. [1 ]
Lee, Vivian S. [1 ]
Israel, Gary M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; ABDOMINAL ORGANS; HEPATIC-LESIONS; BRAIN; DIFFERENTIATION; GADOLINIUM; PERFUSION; COEFFICIENT; KIDNEY; REGION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2512080880
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of contrast material-enhanced (CE) MR imaging and to assess the performance of these examinations combined for the characterization of renal lesions, with MR follow-up and histopathologic analysis as the reference standards. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board waived the requirement of informed patient consent for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study. One hundred nine renal lesions in 64 patients (46 men, 18 women; mean age, 60.7 years) were evaluated with CE MR imaging and breath-hold DW imaging performed with various b values. Renal lesions were characterized with use of CE MR criteria, and apparent diffusion coefficients(ADCs) were measured. The ADCs of benign and malignant lesions were compared at Mann-Whitney testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of DW imaging and CE MR imaging in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Results: The 109 renal lesions-81 benign lesions and 28 RCCs had a mean diameter of 4.2 cm +/- 2.5 (standard deviation). The mean ADC for RCCs (1.41 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.61) was significantly lower (P < .0001) than that for benign lesions (2.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.87) at DW imaging performed with b values of 0, 400, and 800 sec/mm(2). At a cutoff ADC of less than or equal to 1.92 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of DW imaging for the diagnosis of RCCs (excluding angiomyolipomas) were 0.856, 86%, and 80%, respectively. The corresponding AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of CE MR imaging were 0.944, 100%, and 89%, respectively. Combined DW and CE MR imaging had 96% specificity. The AUC for the DW imaging-based diagnosis of solid RCC versus oncocytoma was 0.854. Papillary RCCs had lower ADCs than nonpapillary RCCs. Conclusion: DW imaging can be used to characterize renal lesions; however, compared with CE MR imaging, it is less accurate. DW imaging can be used to differentiate solid RCCs from oncocytomas and characterize the histologic subtypes of RCC. (C) BSNA, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 407
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] T1 Hyperintense Renal Lesions: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging versus Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Kim, Sooah
    Jain, Monica
    Harris, Andrew B.
    Lee, Vivian S.
    Babb, James S.
    Sigmund, Eric E.
    Rueff, Laura E.
    Taouli, Bachir
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (03) : 796 - 807
  • [2] T1 Hyperintense Renal Lesions: Characterization With Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Versus Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging Editorial Comment
    Siegel, Cary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01): : 98 - 99
  • [3] Diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the differentiation of renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas
    Yan Zhong
    Haiyi Wang
    Yanguang Shen
    Aitao Guo
    Jia Wang
    Suhai Kang
    Lu Ma
    Jingjing Pan
    Huiyi Ye
    [J]. European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 4913 - 4922
  • [4] Diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the differentiation of renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas
    Zhong, Yan
    Wang, Haiyi
    Shen, Yanguang
    Guo, Aitao
    Wang, Jia
    Kang, Suhai
    Ma, Lu
    Pan, Jingjing
    Ye, Huiyi
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (12) : 4913 - 4922
  • [5] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of renal lesions
    Squillaci, E
    Manenti, G
    Di Roma, M
    Di Stefano, F
    Mucelli, RP
    Simonetti, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 5 - 6
  • [6] Enhanced Mass on Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging: Lesion Characterization Using Combination of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MR Images
    Yabuuchi, Hidetake
    Matsuo, Yoshio
    Okafuji, Takashi
    Kamitani, Takeshi
    Soeda, Hiroyasu
    Setoguchi, Taro
    Sakai, Shuji
    Hatakenaka, Masamitsu
    Kubo, Makoto
    Sadanaga, Noriaki
    Yamamoto, Hidetaka
    Honda, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 28 (05) : 1157 - 1165
  • [7] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Versus Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in the Identification and Characterisation of Acute Pyelonephritis
    Faletti, Riccardo
    Cassinis, Maria Carla
    Fonio, Paolo
    Grasso, Angela
    Battisti, Giacomo
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Gandini, Giovanni
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (12) : 3501 - 3508
  • [8] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in multiple sclerosis: comparison with contrast-enhanced study
    Tsuchiya, K
    Hachiya, J
    Maehara, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 31 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [9] Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of papillary breast lesions
    Yildiz, Seyma
    Toprak, Huseyin
    Ersoy, Yeliz Emine
    Malya, Fatma Umit
    Bakan, Ayse Ahsen
    Aralasmak, Ayse
    Gucin, Zuhal
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (02): : 176 - 179
  • [10] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging in the Head and Neck: Correlation with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Xu, Xiao Quan
    Choi, Young Jun
    Sung, Yu Sub
    Yoon, Ra Gyoung
    Jang, Seung Won
    Park, Ji Eun
    Heo, Young Jin
    Baek, Jung Hwan
    Lee, Jeong Hyun
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 17 (05) : 641 - 649