Using Natural Pelt Patterns to Estimate Population Abundance with Mark-Resight Models

被引:4
|
作者
Teton, Ben S. [1 ,5 ]
Lewis, Jesse S. [2 ]
Wright, Christina T. [3 ]
White, Michael [1 ]
Young, Hillary [4 ]
机构
[1] Tejon Ranch Conservancy, 1037 Bear Trap Dr, Lebec, CA 93243 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Coll Integrat Sci & Arts, 6073 Backus Mall, Mesa, AZ 85212 USA
[3] Toyon Res Corp, 6800 Cortona Dr, Goleta, CA 93117 USA
[4] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[5] Ctr Nat Lands Management, 233 Congress Ave, Pacific Grove, CA 93950 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2020年 / 44卷 / 04期
关键词
abundance estimation; California; camera trap; invasive species; natural mark identification; Poisson log‐ normal; Sus scrofa; Tehachappi Mountains; wild pig; BOAR SUS-SCROFA; CAMERA-TRAP; SIZE; MANAGEMENT; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1133
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
To estimate population abundance of wide-ranging and elusive species, wildlife managers require practical data-collection methods that are efficient, accurate, and cost-effective. Natural abundance marking can provide a useful solution, but it has largely been utilized only for conservation monitoring of species with very high distinctiveness. We estimated abundance of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa), a widespread pest species with low to moderate distinctiveness, in the Tehachapi Mountains of California, USA. Wild pigs are increasingly recognized as a major threat to wildland communities throughout the United States, but we still lack cost-effective ways to track their populations. We used natural markings to identify individuals for mark-resight population estimation, developing a method based on standardized thresholds of image quality and animal flank distinctiveness to account for the inherent variability of natural markings among individuals. We tested our method over a 15-month period during 2015 and 2016, using an array of 48 camera traps across a 48-km(2) survey grid. With 18.5% of wild pigs meeting our conservative standard of identifiability, we estimated abundance using standard mark-resight methods that ranged from 506 (+/- 69 [SE]) individuals in summer 2015 to 184 (+/- 44) individuals in spring 2016. We were able to detect a likely decline in the wild pig population from 2015 to 2016, which was supported by a simultaneous decline in hunter harvest totals in the region during the same period. Our approach requires no trapping or tagging of any kind, so it may be utilized as an efficient alternative to techniques that rely on physically capturing animals to apply ear-tags or neck-bands for individual identification. (c) 2020 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 704
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] To catch or to sight? A comparison of demographic parameter estimates obtained from mark-recapture and mark-resight models
    K. A. Lee
    C. Huveneers
    O. Gimenez
    V. Peddemors
    R. G. Harcourt
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2014, 23 : 2781 - 2800
  • [42] Combining ground count, telemetry, and mark-resight data to infer population dynamics in an endangered species
    Johnson, Heather E.
    Mills, L. Scott
    Wehausen, John D.
    Stephenson, Thomas R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 47 (05) : 1083 - 1093
  • [43] To catch or to sight? A comparison of demographic parameter estimates obtained from mark-recapture and mark-resight models
    Lee, K. A.
    Huveneers, C.
    Gimenez, O.
    Peddemors, V.
    Harcourt, R. G.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 23 (11) : 2781 - 2800
  • [44] Comparing fecal DNA capture-recapture to mark-resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
    Stewart, Andi M.
    Conner, Mary M.
    McKeever, Jane S.
    Ellsworth, Alisa
    Crowhurst, Rachel S.
    Epps, Clinton W.
    Stephenson, Thomas R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 87 (02):
  • [45] State uncertainty models and mark-resight models for understanding non-breeding site use by Piping Plovers
    Cohen, Jonathan B.
    Maddock, Sidney B.
    Bimbi, Melissa K.
    Golder, W. Walker
    Ledee, Olivia E.
    Cuthbert, Francesca J.
    Catlin, Daniel H.
    Fraser, James D.
    Gratto-Trevor, Cheri L.
    [J]. IBIS, 2018, 160 (02) : 342 - 354
  • [46] Generalized spatial mark-resight models with incomplete identification: An application to red fox density estimates
    Jimenez, Jose
    Chandler, Richard
    Tobajas, Jorge
    Descalzo, Esther
    Mateo, Rafael
    Ferreras, Pablo
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (08): : 4739 - 4748
  • [47] Using novel spatial mark-resight techniques to monitor resident Canada geese in a suburban environment
    Rutledge, M. Elizabeth
    Sollmann, Rahel
    Washburn, Brian E.
    Moorman, Christopher E.
    DePerno, Christopher S.
    [J]. WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 41 (05) : 447 - 453
  • [48] Spatial-Mark-Resight Model to Estimate Raccoon Abundance in Yosemite Valley, California
    Kukielka, Esther A.
    Martinez-Lopez, Beatriz
    Ballweber, Lora R.
    Buttke, Danielle
    Patrick, Katie
    Wold, E. Binta
    Mazur, Rachel
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2021, 45 (02): : 206 - 214
  • [49] Comparing fecal DNA mark-recapture to mark-resight for estimating mule deer abundance on winter range in the eastern Sierra Nevada
    Stewart, Andi M.
    Conner, Mary M.
    McKeever, Jane
    German, Dave W.
    Stephenson, Tom R.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA FISH AND WILDLIFE JOURNAL, 2022, 108 (03):
  • [50] Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models
    Sean M. Murphy
    David T. Wilckens
    Ben C. Augustine
    Mark A. Peyton
    Glenn C. Harper
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 9