Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems

被引:198
|
作者
Heydecke, G
Butz, F
Hussein, A
Strub, JR
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Sch Dent, Dept Biol & Mat Sci, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Albert Ludwigs Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Freiburg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2002年 / 87卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mpr.2002.123849
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. prefabricated metal and ceramic posts can be used with direct or indirect cores as an alternative to the conventional cast post and core. It is nuclear how the fracture strength of zirconia posts with composite or ceramic cores and titanium posts with composite cores compares to the fracture strength of gold posts and cores after dynamic loading. Purpose. This study compared the fracture strength of endodontically treated, crowned maxillary incisors with limited ferrule length and different post-and-core systems after fatigue loading. Material and methods. Sixty-four caries-free, human maxillary central incisors were divided into 4 groups. After root canal treatment, Group 1 was restored with titanium posts and composite cores, Group 2 with zirconia posts and composite cores, and Group 3 with zirconia posts and heat-pressed ceramic cores. Teeth restored with cast-on gold posts and cores served as the controls (Group 4). Teeth were prepared with a circumferential shoulder including a I to 2 turn ferrule; all posts were cemented with an adhesive resin cement, restored with complete-coverage crowns, and exposed to 1.2 million load cycles (30 N) in a computer-controlled chewing simulator. Simultaneous thermocycling between 5degreesC and 55degreesC was applied for 60 seconds with an intermediate pause of 12 seconds. All specimens that did not fracture during dynamic loading were loaded until fracture in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.5 mm/min,- loads were applied at an angle of 130 degrees at the incisal edge. Fracture loads (N) and modes (repairable or catastrophic) were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare fracture loads among the 4 test groups. Analyses were conducted both with and without the specimens that failed during the chewing simulation. A Fisher exact test was performed to detect group differences in fracture modes. A significance level of P<.05 was used for all comparisons. Results. The following survival rates were recorded after the chewing simulation: 93.8% (Group I 93.8% (Group 2), 100% (Group 3), and 87.5% (Group 4). The median fracture strengths for Groups I to 4 were 450 N, 503 N, 521 N, and 408 N, respectively. No significant differences were detected among the groups. The use of zirconia posts resulted in a nonsignificant lower number of catastrophic root fractures. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that zirconia posts with ceramic cores can be recommended as an alternative to cast posts and cores. If a chairside procedure is preferred, zirconia or titanium posts with composite cores can be used. Clinical trials arc required to verify these in vitro results.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 445
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems
    Goto, Y
    Nicholls, JI
    Phillips, KM
    Junge, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 93 (01): : 45 - 50
  • [42] Comparison of the pull-out bond strength of endodontically treated anterior teeth with monolithic zirconia endocrown and post-and-core crown restorations
    Bozkurt, Durmus A.
    Buyukerkmen, Emine B.
    Terlemez, Arslan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2023, 65 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [43] Stress analysis of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with different types of post material
    Nakamura, T
    Ohyama, T
    Waki, T
    Kinuta, S
    Wakabayashi, K
    Mutobe, Y
    Takano, N
    Yatani, H
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2006, 25 (01) : 145 - 150
  • [44] Effects of alpha-tocopherol antioxidant on fracture strength and adhesion of endodontically treated teeth restored after dental bleaching
    Marcomini, Natalia
    Albaricci, Maria Carolina da Costa
    Costa, Joatan Lucas de Sousa Gomes
    Besegato, Joao Felipe
    Godoy, Eduardo Fernandez
    Dantas, Andrea Abi Rached
    Kuga, Milton Carlos
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2024, 132 (01)
  • [45] CUSP FRACTURE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED POSTERIOR TEETH RESTORED WITH AMALGAM - TEETH RESTORED IN DENMARK BEFORE 1975 VERSUS AFTER 1979
    HANSEN, EK
    ASMUSSEN, E
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 51 (02) : 73 - 77
  • [46] Fracture resistance of compromised endodontically treated teeth restored with bonded post and cores: An in vitro study
    Maroulakos, Georgios
    Nagy, William W.
    Kontogiorgos, Elias D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 114 (03): : 390 - 397
  • [47] Comparison of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and composite resin cores with different post lenghts
    do Valle, Accacio Lins
    Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
    Shiratori, Fabio Kenji
    Pegoraro, Luiz Fernando
    Bonfante, Gerson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2007, 15 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [48] In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with a direct layered fiber-reinforced composite post and core
    Forster, Andras
    Sary, Tekla
    Braunitzer, Gabor
    Frater, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (13) : 1454 - 1466
  • [49] Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with various esthetic posts
    Haralur, Satheesh B.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2021, 29 (02) : 243 - 252
  • [50] Survival Rate and Fracture Strength of Incisors Restored with Different Post and Core Systems and Endodontically Treated Incisors without Coronoradicular Reinforcement (vol 28, pg 710, 2002)
    Pontius, O.
    Nathanson, D.
    Giordano, R.
    Schilder, H.
    Hutter, J. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2012, 38 (03) : 356 - 356