Influence of whitebark pine decline on fall habitat use and movements of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

被引:17
|
作者
Costello, Cecily M. [1 ]
van Manen, Frank T. [2 ]
Haroldson, Mark A. [2 ]
Ebinger, Michael R. [1 ]
Cain, Steven L. [3 ]
Gunther, Kerry A. [4 ]
Bjornlie, Daniel D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA
[3] Grand Teton Natl Pk, Moose, WY 83012 USA
[4] Natl Pk Serv, Yellowstone Ctr Resources, Bear Management Off, Yellowstone Natl Pk, WY 82190 USA
[5] Wyoming Game & Fish Dept, Large Carnivore Sect, Lander, WY 82520 USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2014年 / 4卷 / 10期
关键词
activity radius; diet; food; foraging; habitat selection; Manly-Chesson index; mast production; Pinus albicaulis; roads; Ursus arctos; AMERICAN BLACK BEARS; MAST PRODUCTION; BROWN BEARS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSERVATION; CONSTRAINTS; DISTURBANCE; MOUNTAINS; MORTALITY; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.1082
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
When abundant, seeds of the high-elevation whitebark pine (WBP; Pinus albicaulis) are an important fall food for grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Rates of bear mortality and bear/human conflicts have been inversely associated with WBP productivity. Recently, mountain pine beetles (Dendroctonus ponderosae) have killed many cone-producing WBP trees. We used fall (15 August-30 September) Global Positioning System locations from 89 bear years to investigate temporal changes in habitat use and movements during 2000-2011. We calculated Manly-Chesson (MC) indices for selectivity of WBP habitat and secure habitat (500m from roads and human developments), determined dates of WBP use, and documented net daily movement distances and activity radii. To evaluate temporal trends, we used regression, model selection, and candidate model sets consisting of annual WBP production, sex, and year. One-third of sampled grizzly bears had fall ranges with little or no mapped WBP habitat. Most other bears (72%) had a MC index above 0.5, indicating selection for WBP habitats. From 2000 to 2011, mean MC index decreased and median date of WBP use shifted about 1week later. We detected no trends in movement indices over time. Outside of national parks, there was no correlation between the MC indices for WBP habitat and secure habitat, and most bears (78%) selected for secure habitat. Nonetheless, mean MC index for secure habitat decreased over the study period during years of good WBP productivity. The wide diet breadth and foraging plasticity of grizzly bears likely allowed them to adjust to declining WBP. Bears reduced use of WBP stands without increasing movement rates, suggesting they obtained alternative fall foods within their local surroundings. However, the reduction in mortality risk historically associated with use of secure, high-elevation WBP habitat may be diminishing for bears residing in multiple-use areas.
引用
收藏
页码:2004 / 2018
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Climate change, whitebark pine, and grizzly bears in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem.
    Koteen, LE
    [J]. AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 1999, 39 (05): : 113A - 114A
  • [2] Whitebark Pine, Population Density, and Home-Range Size of Grizzly Bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Bjornlie, Daniel D.
    Van Manen, Frank T.
    Ebinger, Michael R.
    Haroldson, Mark A.
    Thompson, Daniel J.
    Costello, Cecily M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [3] Dietary breadth of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Gunther, Kerry A.
    Shoemaker, Rebecca R.
    Frey, Kevin L.
    Haroldson, Mark A.
    Cain, Steven L.
    van Mame, Frank T.
    Fortin, Jennifer K.
    [J]. URSUS, 2014, 25 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [4] Distribution of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in 2004
    Schwartz, CC
    Haroldson, MA
    Gunther, KA
    Moody, D
    [J]. URSUS, 2006, 17 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [5] Possible effects of elk harvest on fall distribution of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Haroldson, MA
    Schwartz, CC
    Cherry, S
    Moody, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 68 (01): : 129 - 137
  • [6] Use of sulfur and nitrogen stable isotopes to determine the importance of whitebark pine nuts to Yellowstone grizzly bears
    Felicetti, LA
    Schwartz, CC
    Rye, RO
    Haroldson, MA
    Gunther, KA
    Phillips, DL
    Robbins, CT
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 2003, 81 (05): : 763 - 770
  • [7] Distribution of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, 1990-2000
    Schwartz, CC
    Haroldson, MA
    Gunther, KA
    Moody, D
    [J]. URSUS, 2002, 13 : 203 - 212
  • [8] Grizzly bear denning chronology and movements in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Haroldson, MA
    Ternent, MA
    Gunther, KA
    Schwartz, CC
    [J]. URSUS, 2002, 13 : 29 - 37
  • [9] Biophysical Gradients and Performance of Whitebark Pine Plantings in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Laufenberg, David
    Thoma, David
    Hansen, Andrew
    Hu, Jia
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (01):
  • [10] Use of lodgepole pine cover types by Yellowstone grizzly bears
    Mattson, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1997, 61 (02): : 480 - 496