Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method

被引:120
|
作者
Wang, Zheng-Xin [1 ]
Wang, Yan-Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ & Int Trade, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Competitiveness evaluation; High-tech industry; Mahalanobis distance; TOPSIS; Information overlap; DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.015
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Evaluation of the competitiveness of high-tech industry is a technical decision-making issue involving multiple criteria. It is also a practical path to promote a country's competitiveness. However, the competitiveness indicators in high-tech industry often act and react upon one another. Moreover, different dimensions and indicator weights also affect the evaluation results. In this paper, the Mahalanobis distance is used to improve the traditional technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The improved TOPSIS method has the following properties: (1) an improved relative closeness which is invariant after non-singular linear transformation, and (2) the weighted Mahalanobis distance is the same as the weighted Euclidean distance when the indicators are uncorrelated. The new method is applied to evaluate the competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using data from 2011. Consideration of the correlation between indicators improves the evaluation results (in terms of sorting and closeness) to a certain extent compared to the traditional TOPSIS method. The top five provinces are: Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Beijing, and Shandong. This finding reflects the practical linkage among provinces and softens the closeness value, consistent with reality. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2824 / 2831
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Analysis on the Development of the Competitiveness within High-Tech Industries in Wuhan under the "Transfer of Industry"
    Shao, Bochun
    [J]. NINTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2010, : 1671 - 1679
  • [32] The Influence of High-tech Product Complexity on The Technological Innovation of High-tech Industry
    Wang Lingqiu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ICFIED 2019), 2019, 76 : 225 - 229
  • [33] Study on Competitiveness Evaluation of High-tech Enterprise Based on Scientific Concept of Development
    Yuan, Xiu'e
    Zhang, Meng
    [J]. EDUCATION AND EDUCATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 3 : 147 - 151
  • [34] Operational Competitiveness Research of Chinese High-Tech International Manufacturing Company in Global Context
    Si, Shubin
    Takala, Josu
    Liu, Yang
    Toshev, Rayko
    Tang, Zhi
    [J]. IEEM: 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 1915 - +
  • [35] STRATEGY FOR ENSURING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
    Fedotova, Marina
    Polzunova, Natalia
    [J]. STRATEGICA: CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO IN MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2018, : 346 - 358
  • [36] RACE AND REHIRING IN THE HIGH-TECH INDUSTRY
    MAR, D
    ONG, PM
    [J]. REVIEW OF BLACK POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 22 (03): : 43 - 54
  • [38] Analysis of contribution of high-tech industry
    Song, F
    Liu, XT
    [J]. Fourth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business: The Internet Era & The Global Enterprise, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 1446 - 1451
  • [39] China's High-Tech Industry
    Sun Suhui High-Tech Planning Joint Office State Science and Technology Commission
    [J]. China's Foreign Trade, 1994, (02) : 9 - 10
  • [40] Analysing the impact of high-tech industry on regional competitiveness with principal component analysis method based on the new development concept
    Deng, Shuaijie
    Li, Baosheng
    Wu, Ke
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (09) : 3647 - 3666