Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method

被引:120
|
作者
Wang, Zheng-Xin [1 ]
Wang, Yan-Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ & Int Trade, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Competitiveness evaluation; High-tech industry; Mahalanobis distance; TOPSIS; Information overlap; DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.015
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Evaluation of the competitiveness of high-tech industry is a technical decision-making issue involving multiple criteria. It is also a practical path to promote a country's competitiveness. However, the competitiveness indicators in high-tech industry often act and react upon one another. Moreover, different dimensions and indicator weights also affect the evaluation results. In this paper, the Mahalanobis distance is used to improve the traditional technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The improved TOPSIS method has the following properties: (1) an improved relative closeness which is invariant after non-singular linear transformation, and (2) the weighted Mahalanobis distance is the same as the weighted Euclidean distance when the indicators are uncorrelated. The new method is applied to evaluate the competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using data from 2011. Consideration of the correlation between indicators improves the evaluation results (in terms of sorting and closeness) to a certain extent compared to the traditional TOPSIS method. The top five provinces are: Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Beijing, and Shandong. This finding reflects the practical linkage among provinces and softens the closeness value, consistent with reality. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2824 / 2831
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on Evaluation of Chinese Mainland Regions' High-tech Industry Competitiveness
    Xia, Pan
    [J]. 2012 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SOCIETY MANAGEMENT (ICPESM 2012), VOL 9, 2012, 9 : 500 - 506
  • [2] An Evaluation and Analysis on High-tech Industry Competitiveness in Fujian
    Shi Sheng-xu
    Wu Sheng-yi
    [J]. MEMS, NANO AND SMART SYSTEMS, PTS 1-6, 2012, 403-408 : 3281 - 3286
  • [3] Analysis of regional competitiveness in the high-tech industry
    He, Weida
    Lin, Zhifeng
    Hao, Rong
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2018, 114 (04): : 854 - 860
  • [4] HIGH-TECH COMPETITIVENESS
    BURTON, DF
    [J]. FOREIGN POLICY, 1993, (92) : 117 - &
  • [5] Comprehensive Evaluation of Technological Innovation in Chinese High-tech Industry
    Qin Haiping
    He Yujing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 254 - 258
  • [6] A Research on Innovation Ability of Chinese High-tech Industry Evaluation
    Pan Xia
    Chen Jun
    Ju Xiao-feng
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 448 - +
  • [7] Evaluation on the Competitiveness of High-tech Entrepreneurial Enterprises
    Wang Yanrong
    Liu Yu
    Liu Kang
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 : 684 - 689
  • [8] Research on the Competitiveness of High-tech Service Industry in Dalian
    Fan Xiaonan
    Lv Jiaqi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH (ICHSSR 2017), 2017, 121 : 98 - 102
  • [9] Evaluation of the Innovative Capacity of Provincial High-tech Industries in China based on Integrated Theil and TOPSIS
    Jia, Yingying
    Peng, Guo
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2016, : 3493 - 3497
  • [10] An Evaluation Analysis of the Scientific & Technical Competitiveness of High-Tech Industry Based on the DEA
    Cui, Ying
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 477 - 480