Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization and Decision-Making using Reference Direction Method

被引:0
|
作者
Deb, Kalyanmoy [1 ]
Kumar, Abhishek [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Multi-objective optimization; Reference direction method; Decision-making; Interactive EMO;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we borrow the concept of reference direction approach from the multi-criterion decision-making literature and combine it with all EMO procedure to develop an algorithm for finding a single preferred solution ill a multi-objective optimization scenario efficiently. EMO methodologies are adequately used to find a set of representative efficient, solutions over Hie past decade. This study is timely in addressing the issue Of optimizing and choosing a single solution using certain preference information. In this approach, the user supplies one or more reference directions in the objective, space. The population approach of EMO methodologies is exploited to find a Set of efficient, solutions corresponding to a number of representative points along the reference, direction. By using a utility function, a single solution is chosen for further analysis. This procedure is continued till no further improvement is possible. The, working of the procedure is demonstrated oil a set of test problems having two to tell Objectives and oil an engineering design problem. Results are verified with theoretically exact solutions oil two-objective test, problems.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 788
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Cone Dominance
    Dalaijargal Purevsuren
    Saif ur Rehman
    Gang Cui
    Jianmin Bao
    Nwe Nwe Htay Win
    [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015, 22 (06) - 84
  • [32] Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization for Decision-Making in Building Automation
    Yang, Rui
    Wang, Lingfeng
    Wang, Zhu
    [J]. 2011 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2011,
  • [34] A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Making
    Roijers, Diederik M.
    Vamplew, Peter
    Whiteson, Shimon
    Dazeley, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2013, 48 : 67 - 113
  • [35] Multi-objective decision-making for road design
    Brauers, Willem Karel M.
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Peldschus, Friedel
    Turskis, Zenonas
    [J]. TRANSPORT, 2008, 23 (03) : 183 - 193
  • [36] MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN WATER MANAGEMENT
    FLECKSEDER, H
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 13 (03) : 115 - 127
  • [37] Interactive multi-attribute decision-making NSGA-II for constrained multi-objective optimization with interval numbers
    Chen, Zhi-Wang
    Chen, Lin
    Bai, Xin
    Yang, Qi
    Zhao, Fang-Liang
    [J]. Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2015, 30 (05): : 865 - 870
  • [38] Interactive MOEA/D for Multi-objective Decision Making
    Gong, Maoguo
    Liu, Fang
    Zhang, Wei
    Jiao, Licheng
    Zhang, Qingfu
    [J]. GECCO-2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH ANNUAL GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2011, : 721 - 728
  • [39] Interactive multi-objective evolutionary optimization of software architectures
    Ramirez, Aurora
    Raul Romero, Jose
    Ventura, Sebastian
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 463 : 92 - 109
  • [40] Multi-objective Optimization Design of Steel Frames Based on Multiple Attribute Decision-making Method
    Cui Mao-qiao
    Huang Hai-yan
    Wang Fu-lai
    Qiu Yong
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-3, 2013, 368-370 : 830 - 837