Cefazolin prophylaxis in spine surgery: patients are frequently underdosed and at increased risk for infection

被引:5
|
作者
Karamian, Brian A. [1 ]
Toci, Gregory R. [1 ]
Lambrechts, Mark J. [1 ]
Siegel, Nicholas [1 ]
Sherman, Matthew [1 ]
Canseco, Jose A. [1 ]
Hilibrand, Alan S. [1 ]
Kepler, Christopher K. [1 ]
Vaccaro, Alexander R. [1 ]
Schroeder, Gregory D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2022年 / 22卷 / 09期
关键词
Cefazolin; Cervical; Clinical outcomes; Dosing by weight; Infection rate; Lumbar; Perioperative antibiotics; Spine surgery; Surgical site infection; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; BODY-MASS INDEX; INTRAWOUND VANCOMYCIN POWDER; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; LUMBAR FUSION; PREVENTION; GUIDELINE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Perioperative antibiotics are critical in reducing the risk of postoperative spine infections. However, the efficacy and optimal weight-based prophylactic cefazolin dosing is unclear. PURPOSE: To determine (1) if inadequate weight-based prophylactic dosing of cefazolin affects infection rates after spinal fusions, and (2) identify the optimal dosing of cefazolin. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single center retrospective cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing posterior cervical or lumbar spinal fusion between January 2000 and October 2020 OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative surgical site infection status METHODS: Patients were grouped based on our institutionally derived dosing adequacy standards, 1 g for < 60 kg, 2 g for 60 to 120 kg, and 3 g for > 120 kg. Univariate comparisons and multivariate regressions identified the effect of inadequate dosing on infection rate. Patients were subsequently regrouped into cefazolin dose (grams) administered and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were compiled to determine the probability of infection based on cefazolin dose and patient weight. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 2,643 patients met inclusion criteria and 95 infections (3.6%) were identified. The infection rate was higher in the inadequate dosing group (5.86% vs. 2.58%, p<. 001). Adequate dosing was a predictor of decreased infections after lumbar fusion (OR: 0.43, p<.001), but not posterior cervical fusions (OR: 0.47, p=.065). Patients were subsequently regrouped into 1 g or 2 g of cefazolin administered resulting in a 5.01% and 2.77% infection rate, respectively (p=.005). The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval for one (0.850 [0.777-0.924]) and two (0.575 [0.493-0.657]) g of cefazolin demonstrated lower infection rates for patients given 2 g cefazolin. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving an inadequate weight-based dose of preoperative cefazolin had an increased risk of infection following spinal fusion surgery. Two grams prophylactic cefazolin significantly reduces the likelihood of infection. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1442 / 1450
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] SAFETY OF CEFAZOLIN PERIOPERATIVE PROPHYLAXIS IN PLASTIC SURGERY PATIENTS WITH PENICILLIN ALLERGY
    Dong, R.
    Lanier, K.
    Kraft, C.
    Skoracki, R.
    Lehrman, C.
    Kraft, M.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 129 : S18 - S18
  • [12] Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis and Wound Management in Spine Surgery
    White, Alexandra J.
    Fiani, Brian
    Jarrah, Ryan
    Momin, Arbaz A.
    Rasouli, Jonathan
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (03) : 451 - 461
  • [13] Impact of Plastic Surgery and an Enhanced Prophylaxis Protocol on Cervical Spine Surgery Infection
    Choudhri, Tanvir F.
    Li, Adam Y.
    Ali, Muhammad
    Spiera, Zachary
    Marayati, Naoum Fares
    Schupper, Alexander J.
    Durbin, John
    Asghar, Nek
    Dreher, Nickolas
    Hannah, Theodore
    Sayegh, Farah
    Bellaire, Christopher
    Harmaty, Marco A.
    Torina, Philip
    Ting, Jess
    Taub, Peter J.
    PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 32 (03) : 445 - 451
  • [14] Increased rates of periprosthetic joint infection following hip hemiarthroplasty with clindamycin prophylaxis compared to cefazolin
    Nadav Graif
    Nissan Amzallag
    Assaf Kadar
    Itay Ashkenazi
    Shai Factor
    Aviram Gold
    Nimrod Snir
    Yaniv Warschawski
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 145 (1)
  • [15] Intraoperative redosing of cefazolin and risk for surgical site infection in cardiac surgery
    Zanetti, G
    Giardina, R
    Platt, R
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (05) : 828 - 831
  • [16] Duration of cefazolin prophylaxis did not impact infection risk in a murine model of joint arthroplasty
    Karau, Melissa J.
    Alarcon Perico, Diego
    Guarin Perez, Serigo F.
    Koscianski, Christina
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Patel, Robin
    Bedard, Nicholas A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [17] Is prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after major surgery associated with an increased risk of nosocomial bloodstream infection?
    Harbarth, S
    Samore, MH
    Lichtenberg, D
    Carmeli, Y
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 190 (04) : 503 - 504
  • [18] Intradural spine surgery may not carry an increased risk of shunt revision compared with extradural spine surgery in pediatric patients with myelomeningocele
    Kuhn, Elizabeth N.
    Hopson, Betsy
    Conklin, Michael J.
    Blount, Jeffrey P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2018, 21 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [19] Prophylaxis of surgical site infection in adult spine surgery: A systematic review
    Yao, Reina
    Tan, Terence
    Tee, Jin Wee
    Street, John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 52 : 5 - 25
  • [20] Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Infection in Cancer Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery
    Morais Tavares-Junior, Mauro Costa
    Delgado Cabrera, Gabriela Estefania
    Jacobsen Teixeira, William Gemio
    Narazaki, Douglas Kenji
    Ghilardi, Cesar Salge
    Marcon, Raphael Martus
    Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca
    Pessoa De Barros-Filho, Tarcisio Eloy
    CLINICS, 2021, 76