Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy

被引:64
|
作者
Burgess, Scott V. [1 ]
Atug, Fatih [1 ]
Castle, Erik P. [1 ]
Davis, Rodney [1 ]
Thomas, Raju [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Div Minimally Invas Urol Surg, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2006.20.827
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Radical prostatectomy can be performed via a retropubic, perineal, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Our goal was to evaluate the actual charges incurred at our institution with patients undergoing retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), perineal prostatectomy (RPP), and robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all prostatectomy patients treated over a 22-month period (February 2002-December 2004). The case log included 78 RALPs, 16 RRPs, and 16 RPPs. Hospital charges were broken down into operative and nonoperative amounts. Operative times, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were all determined from the patient medical record. The robotic charges were divided further into the initial and final 20 cases. Results: There were significantly higher overall charges for patients undergoing RALP. The operative charges encountered during the robotic "learning curve" were substantially higher than those during our most recent 20 cases. This reduction seemed to correlate directly with the decreasing operative time. The mean operative time for RALP was 262 minutes (range 150-679 minutes). The mean operative time decreased to 225 minutes for our last 20 cases. In contrast, the mean times for RRP and RPP were similar, 202 minutes (range 142-348 minutes) and 196 minutes (range 105-337 minutes), respectively. Conclusion: Robot-assisted prostatectomy is associated with substantially higher operative and total hospital charges in addition to the capital expense incurred by the hospital in acquiring and maintaining the robotic system. The operative charges did decrease substantially (27%) once the learning curve had been overcome. Perineal prostatectomy, in experienced hands, remains the most cost-effective procedure, with lower operative costs and shorter times. There was no significant difference in the nonoperative charges in the three treatment groups secondary to the short hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 830
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gasless robotic perineal radical prostatectomy: An initial experience
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    Sam, Emre
    Seker, Kamil Gokhan
    Atar, Feyzi Arda
    Sahin, Selcuk
    Tugcu, Volkan
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 : 117 - 120
  • [42] Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy with high prostate volume
    Tugcu, Volkan
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    Yigitbasi, Ismail
    Yenice, Mustafa Gurkan
    Sahin, Selcuk
    Tasci, Ali Ishsan
    [J]. ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2018, 90 (01) : 65 - 67
  • [43] Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 : A59 - A59
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience
    Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira
    Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães
    Thiago Camelo Mourão
    Ricardo de Lima Favaretto
    Thiago Borges Marques Santana
    Ademar Lopes
    Stenio de Cassio Zequi
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 859 - 868
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience
    de Oliveira, Renato Almeida Rosa
    Guimaraes, Gustavo Cardoso
    Mourao, Thiago Camelo
    de Lima Favaretto, Ricardo
    Santana, Thiago Borges Marques
    Lopes, Ademar
    de Cassio Zequi, Stenio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (06) : 859 - 868
  • [46] EARLY URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A COMPARISON OF RADICAL PERINEAL, RETROPUBIC AND ENDOSCOPIC-PREPERITONEAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Klitsch, M. C.
    Bliem, F.
    Boehm, R.
    Holup, P.
    Bauer, W.
    Lamche, M.
    Schramek, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (06) : 638 - 638
  • [47] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Is There Any Real Difference?
    Healy, Kelly A.
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2013, 40 (03) : 286 - 296
  • [48] Radical Perineal Prostatectomy versus Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy after Previous Prostate Surgery: Surgical and Functional Outcomes
    Imperatore, Vittorio
    Cantiello, Francesco
    Fusco, Ferdinando
    Iannuzzo, Mariateresa
    Di Meo, Sergio
    Imbimbo, Ciro
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2011, 86 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [49] A comparison of the robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Laviana, A. A.
    Hu, J. C.
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2013, 65 (03) : 161 - 170
  • [50] Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Anderson, JK
    Murdock, A
    Cadeddu, JA
    Lotan, Y
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (03) : 557 - 560