An analysis of H → γγ up to three-loop QCD corrections

被引:17
|
作者
Wang, Sheng-Quan [1 ]
Wu, Xing-Gang [1 ]
Zheng, Xu-Chang [1 ]
Chen, Gu [1 ]
Shen, Jian-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Dept Phys, Chongqing 401331, Peoples R China
关键词
Higgs; perturbative QCD; renormalization scale; HIGGS-BOSON; QUARK MASS; DECAY; (MS)OVER-BAR;
D O I
10.1088/0954-3899/41/7/075010
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
The principle of maximum conformality (PMC) provides a convenient way for setting the optimal renormalization scales for high-energy processes, which can eliminate the conventional renormalization scale error via an order-byorder manner. At present, we make a detailed PMC analysis on the Higgs decay H -> gamma gamma up to three-loop QCD corrections. As an important point of deriving reliable PMC estimation, it is noted that only those {beta(i)}-terms that rightly determine the running behavior of coupling constant via the renormalization group equation should be absorbed into the coupling constant, and those {beta(i)}-terms that pertain to the quark mass renormalization and etc should be kept as a separate. To avoid confusion of separating and absorbing different types of {beta(i)}-terms into the coupling constant, we first transform the decay width in terms of top-quark (MS) over bar mass into that of on-shell mass and then apply the PMC scale setting. After applying PMC scale setting, the final estimation is conformal and is scheme-independent and scale-independent. Up to three-loop QCD corrections, we obtain a PMC scale mu(PMC)(r) = 242.3 GeV similar to 2M(H), which is optimal and highly independent of any choice of initial scale. Thus, we obtain a more accurate scale-independent prediction by taking the Higgs mass as the same as that of ATLAS and CMS measurements, i.e., Gamma (H -> gamma gamma)vertical bar(ATLAS) = 9.504(-0.252)(+0.226) and Gamma(H -> gamma gamma)vertical bar(CMS) = 9.568(-0.191)(+0.195) keV, where the error is caused by the measured Higgs mass, i.e. the Higgs mass M-H is taken as 125.5 +/- 0.2(-0.6)(+0.5) GeV for ATLAS and 125.7 +/- 0.3 +/- 0.3 GeV for CMS, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bottomonium suppression from the three-loop QCD potential
    Brambilla, Nora
    Magorsch, Tom
    Strickland, Michael
    Vairo, Antonio
    Griend, Peter Vander
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 109 (11)
  • [22] Three-loop corrections in a covariant effective field theory
    McIntire, Jeff
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHYSICS, 2008, 323 (06) : 1460 - 1477
  • [23] Two-loop QCD vertices and three-loop MOM β functions
    Chetyrkin, KG
    Seidensticker, T
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2000, 495 (1-2) : 74 - 80
  • [24] Three-loop anomalous dimensions for squarks in supersymmetric QCD
    Hermann, Thomas
    Mihaila, Luminita
    Steinhauser, Matthias
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2011, 703 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [25] The three-loop on-shell renormalization of QCD and QED
    Melnikov, K
    van Ritbergen, T
    [J]. NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 2000, 591 (1-2) : 515 - 546
  • [26] Three-loop corrections to the Lamb shift in muonium and positronium
    Eides, Michael, I
    Shelyuto, Valery A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2022, 105 (01)
  • [27] New determination of |Vcb| using the three-loop QCD corrections for the B → D* semi-leptonic decays
    Zhou, Hua
    Yu, Qing
    Zheng, Xu-Chang
    Fu, Hai-Bing
    Wu, Xing-Gang
    [J]. NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2023, 1030
  • [28] Gluon condensate in charmonium sum rules with three-loop corrections
    B.L. Ioffe
    K.N. Zyablyuk
    [J]. The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields, 2003, 27 : 229 - 241
  • [29] Three-Loop Gluon Scattering in QCD and the Gluon Regge Trajectory
    Caola, Fabrizio
    Chakraborty, Amlan
    Gambuti, Giulio
    von Manteuffel, Andreas
    Tancredi, Lorenzo
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2022, 128 (21)
  • [30] Leading fermionic three-loop corrections to electroweak precision observables
    Chen, Lisong
    Freitas, Ayres
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2020, 2020 (07)