Minimal clinically important difference for change in comfortable gait speed of adults with pathology: a systematic review

被引:246
|
作者
Bohannon, Richard W. [1 ]
Glenney, Susan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Kinesiol, Neag Sch Educ, Program Phys Therapy, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
clinimetrics; gait; measurement; physical therapy; rehabilitation; responsiveness; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; WALKING SPEED; OLDER-ADULTS; REHABILITATION; PEOPLE; STROKE; TRIAL; REQUIREMENTS; AMBULATION;
D O I
10.1111/jep.12158
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims and objectives Walking speed is an important performance variable, but information on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the measure has not been consolidated. In this review, we aimed to summarize information on the MCID for change in comfortable gait speed measurements for patients with pathology. Methods Relevant literature was identified by searches of four databases (PubMed, Web of Knowledge, CINAHL and Scopus), hand searches and consultation with an expert. Inclusion required that articles reported a MCID for comfortable gait speed measurements. Articles were excluded if the MCID was not determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Articles were abstracted for information on participants, interventions, gait speed documentation and the determination of MCID. Quality was assessed using a hybrid 9-item (0-18 point) instrument. Results Seven articles were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The populations studied included stroke (n = 3), hip fracture (n = 2), multiple sclerosis (n = 1) and mixed (n = 1). Using 13 different anchors the studies reported MCIDs of 0.08-0.26 m s(-1). All but three of these MCIDs were between 0.10 and 0.20 m s(-1). All MCIDs for which the area under the ROC curve exceeded 0.70 were between 0.10 and 0.17 m s(-1). Conclusions Changes in gait speed of 0.10 to 0.20 m s(-1) may be important across multiple patient groups.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 300
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Su, Favian
    Allahabadi, Sachin
    Bongbong, Dale N.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    Lansdown, Drew A.
    [J]. CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 (01) : 27 - 46
  • [42] The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: Letter to the Editor
    Tenan, Matthew S.
    Boyer, Christopher W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (13): : NP51 - NP52
  • [43] The importance of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)
    Malec, James
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (6-7) : 739 - 740
  • [44] Foundations of the minimal clinically important difference for imaging
    Lassere, MND
    van der Heijde, D
    Johnson, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2001, 28 (04) : 890 - 891
  • [45] DEFINING A MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE IN CAMPHOR
    Bunclark, K.
    Abraham, N.
    Ali, S.
    Cannon, J. E.
    Sheares, K.
    Speed, N.
    Taboada, D.
    Toshner, M.
    Pepke-Zaba, J.
    [J]. THORAX, 2019, 74 : A155 - A155
  • [46] The minimal clinically important difference in allergic rhinitis
    Barnes, M. L.
    Vaidyanathan, S.
    Williamson, P. A.
    Lipworth, B. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2010, 40 (02): : 242 - 250
  • [47] Assessing the minimal clinically important difference.
    Brant, R
    Sutherland, L
    Hilsden, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 145 (11) : 220 - 220
  • [48] Minimal clinically important difference module: Introduction
    Wells, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2001, 28 (02) : 398 - 399
  • [49] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Maximum Impact
    Kalkman, Cor J.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 132 (06) : 1296 - 1298
  • [50] Estimating the minimal clinically important difference for balance and gait outcome measures in individuals with vestibular disorders
    Wellons, Rachel D.
    Duhe, Sydney E.
    MacDowell, Sara G.
    Hodge, April
    Oxborough, Sara
    Levitzky, Elizabeth E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VESTIBULAR RESEARCH-EQUILIBRIUM & ORIENTATION, 2022, 32 (03): : 223 - 233