Student Assessment Opt Out and the Impact on Value-Added Measures of Teacher Quality

被引:3
|
作者
Marland, Joshua [1 ]
Harrick, Matthew [2 ]
Sireci, Stephen G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, 813 North Pleasant St,Furcolo Hall, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] CUNY Brooklyn Coll, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
关键词
opt out; value-added; teacher evaluation;
D O I
10.1177/0013164419860574
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Student assessment nonparticipation (or opt out) has increased substantially in K-12 schools in states across the country. This increase in opt out has the potential to impact achievement and growth (or value-added) measures used for educator and institutional accountability. In this simulation study, we investigated the extent to which value-added measures of teacher quality are affected as a result of varying degrees of opt out, as well as a result of various types of nonrandom opt out. Results show that the magnitude of opt out and choice of classification scheme has a greater impact on value-added estimates than the type of opt-out patterns simulated in this study. Specifically, root mean square differences in value-added estimates increased as magnitude of opt out increased. In addition, teacher effectiveness classification agreement decreased as opt out magnitude increased. One type of opt out, where the highest achieving students in the highest achieving classrooms opted out, had the largest impact on stability than the other types of opt outs.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 388
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An experimental evaluation of three teacher quality measures: Value-added, classroom observations, and student surveys
    Bacher-Hicks, Andrew
    Chin, Mark J.
    Kane, Thomas J.
    Staiger, Douglas O.
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2019, 73
  • [2] Generalizations about Using Value-Added Measures of Teacher Quality
    Hanushek, Eric A.
    Rivkin, Steven G.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (02): : 267 - 271
  • [3] Value-added student assessment
    Callender, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2004, 29 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [4] Exploring the Potential of Value-Added Performance Measures to Affect the Quality of the Teacher Workforce
    Goldhaber, Dan
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2015, 44 (02) : 87 - 95
  • [5] CAN VALUE-ADDED MEASURES OF TEACHER PERFORMANCE BE TRUSTED?
    Guarino, Cassandra M.
    Reckase, Mark D.
    Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.
    [J]. EDUCATION FINANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 10 (01) : 117 - 156
  • [6] The Reliability, Impact, and Cost-Effectiveness of Value-Added Teacher Assessment Methods
    Yeh, Stuart S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FINANCE, 2012, 37 (04) : 374 - 399
  • [7] Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers
    Ballou, D
    Sanders, W
    Wright, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2004, 29 (01) : 37 - 65
  • [8] Sensitivity of Teacher Value-Added Estimates to Student and Peer Control Variables
    Johnson, Matthew T.
    Lipscomb, Stephen
    Gill, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, 2015, 8 (01) : 60 - 83
  • [9] A Comparison of Student Growth Percentile and Value-Added Models of Teacher Performance
    Guarino, Cassandra
    Reckase, Mark
    Stacy, Brian
    Wooldridge, Jeffrey
    [J]. STATISTICS AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 2 (01): : 66 - 76
  • [10] Value-Added Assessment of Teacher Preparation: Implications for Special Education
    Gansle, Kristin A.
    Noell, George H.
    Grandstaff-Beckers, Gerlinde
    Stringer, Angelle
    Roberts, Nancy
    Burns, Jeanne M.
    [J]. INTERVENTION IN SCHOOL AND CLINIC, 2015, 51 (02) : 106 - 111