Assessment of faculty productivity in academic departments of medicine in the United States: a national survey

被引:31
|
作者
Kairouz, Victor F. [1 ]
Raad, Dany [1 ]
Fudyma, John [1 ]
Curtis, Anne B. [1 ]
Schuenemann, Holger J. [2 ,3 ]
Akl, Elie A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Med, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Internal Med, Beirut 11072020, Lebanon
来源
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION | 2014年 / 14卷
关键词
Faculty productivity; Salary compensation; Academia; Department of medicine; Survey; RESPONSE RATES; PHYSICIANS; COMPENSATION;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-14-205
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Faculty productivity is essential for academic medical centers striving to achieve excellence and national recognition. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether and how academic Departments of Medicine in the United States measure faculty productivity for the purpose of salary compensation. Methods: We surveyed the Chairs of academic Departments of Medicine in the United States in 2012. We sent a paper-based questionnaire along with a personalized invitation letter by postal mail. For non-responders, we sent reminder letters, then called them and faxed them the questionnaire. The questionnaire included 8 questions with 23 tabulated close-ended items about the types of productivity measured (clinical, research, teaching, administrative) and the measurement strategies used. We conducted descriptive analyses. Results: Chairs of 78 of 152 eligible departments responded to the survey (51% response rate). Overall, 82% of respondents reported measuring at least one type of faculty productivity for the purpose of salary compensation. Amongst those measuring faculty productivity, types measured were: clinical (98%), research (61%), teaching (62%), and administrative (64%). Percentages of respondents who reported the use of standardized measurements units (e. g., Relative Value Units (RVUs)) varied from 17% for administrative productivity to 95% for research productivity. Departments reported a wide variation of what exact activities are measured and how they are monetarily compensated. Most compensation plans take into account academic rank (77%). The majority of compensation plans are in the form of a bonus on top of a fixed salary (66%) and/or an adjustment of salary based on previous period productivity (55%). Conclusion: Our survey suggests that most academic Departments of Medicine in the United States measure faculty productivity and convert it into standardized units for the purpose of salary compensation. The exact activities that are measured and how they are monetarily compensated varied substantially across departments.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing the academic achievement of United States orthopaedic departments
    Trikha, Rishi
    Olson, Thomas E.
    Chaudry, Ameen
    Ishmael, Chad R.
    Villalpando, Cristina
    Chen, Clark J.
    Hori, Kellyn R.
    Bernthal, Nicholas M.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 13 (02): : 201 - 211
  • [32] A SURVEY OF ACID ASPIRATION CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS IN ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA IN THE UNITED-STATES AND CANADA
    GREENHALGH, CA
    MCLEAN, JL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (3A) : A1005 - A1005
  • [33] Ethics Education in Family Medicine Training in the United States: a National Survey
    Manson, Helen M.
    Satin, David
    Nelson, Valerie
    Vadiveloo, Thenmalar
    [J]. FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (01) : 28 - 35
  • [34] Lower Rates of Promotion of Generalists in Academic Medicine: A Follow-up to the National Faculty Survey
    Blazey-Martin, Deborah
    Carr, Phyllis L.
    Terrin, Norma
    Breeze, Janis L.
    Luk, Carolyn
    Raj, Anita
    Freund, Karen M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 (07) : 747 - 752
  • [35] Lower Rates of Promotion of Generalists in Academic Medicine: A Follow-up to the National Faculty Survey
    Deborah Blazey-Martin
    Phyllis L. Carr
    Norma Terrin
    Janis L. Breeze
    Carolyn Luk
    Anita Raj
    Karen M. Freund
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2017, 32 : 747 - 752
  • [36] Gender Differences in Academic Medicine: Retention, Rank, and Leadership Comparisons From the National Faculty Survey
    Carr, Phyllis L.
    Raj, Anita
    Kaplan, Samantha E.
    Terrin, Norma
    Breeze, Janis L.
    Freund, Karen M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (11) : 1694 - 1699
  • [37] The glass ceiling thickens: the impact of COVID-19 on academic medicine faculty in the United States
    Lufler, Rebecca S.
    McNulty, Margaret A.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2022, 27 (01):
  • [38] Trends in Racial and Gender Profiles of United States Academic Emergency Medicine Faculty: Cross-Sectional Survey From 2007 to 2018
    Shaikh, Ali Tariq
    Lall, Michelle D.
    Jalal, Sabeena
    Raja, Ali S.
    Fares, Saleh
    Siddiqi, Javed
    Khosa, Faisal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (05): : 617 - 628
  • [39] Gender disparity in research productivity across departments in the faculty of medicine: a bibliometric analysis
    Elza Rachid
    Tania Noureddine
    Hani Tamim
    Maha Makki
    Sally Naalbandian
    Christiane Al-Haddad
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126 : 4715 - 4731
  • [40] Gender and Radiology Publication Productivity: An Examination of Academic Faculty From Four Health Systems in the United States
    McDonald, Jennifer S.
    McDonald, Robert J.
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Jaffe, Tracy A.
    Cook, Tessa S.
    Kallmes, David F.
    Kotsenas, Amy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (08) : 1100 - 1108