Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression

被引:24
|
作者
Hotzy, Florian [1 ]
Theodoridou, Anastasia [1 ]
Hoff, Paul [1 ]
Schneeberger, Andres R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Seifritz, Erich [1 ]
Olbrich, Sebastian [1 ]
Jaeger, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Psychiat Zurich, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Psychiat Dienste Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel, Univ Psychiat Kliniken Basel, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, New York, NY USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2018年 / 9卷
关键词
coercion; seclusion; restraint; coercive medication; involuntary hospitalization; machine learning; PSYCHIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE; INPATIENT CARE; RESTRAINT; SECLUSION; PATIENT; HOSPITALS; FREQUENCY; VIOLENCE; STAFF; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coercive measures. Methods: In a sample of involuntarily hospitalized patients (n = 393) at the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, we analyzed risk factors for the experience of coercion (n = 170 patients) using chi-square tests and Mann Whitney U tests. We trained machine learning algorithms [logistic regression, Supported Vector Machine (SVM), and decision trees] with these risk factors and tested obtained models for their accuracy via five-fold cross validation. To verify the results we compared them to binary logistic regression. Results: In a model with 8 risk-factors which were available at admission, the SVM algorithm identified 102 out of 170 patients, which had experienced coercion and 174 out of 223 patients without coercion (69% accuracy with 60% sensitivity and 78% specificity, AUC 0.74). In a model with 18 risk-factors, available after discharge, the logistic regression algorithm identified 121 out of 170 with and 176 out of 223 without coercion (75% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 79% specificity, AUC 0.82). Discussion: Incorporating both clinical and demographic variables can help to estimate the risk of experiencing coercion for psychiatric patients. This study could show that trained machine learning algorithms are comparable to binary logistic regression and can reach a good or even excellent area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of the outcome coercion/no coercion when cross validation is used. Due to the better generalizability machine learning is a promising approach for further studies, especially when more variables are analyzed. More detailed knowledge about individual risk factors may help to prevent the occurrence of situations involving coercion.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Logistic Regression Approach to Field Estimation Using Binary Measurements
    Leong, Alex S.
    Zamani, Mohammad
    Shames, Iman
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2022, 29 : 1848 - 1852
  • [32] Binary logistic regression approach for decision making in bridge management
    Wijesuriya, Uditha A.
    Tennant, Adam G.
    [J]. INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2022, 9 (02) : 89 - 99
  • [33] A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Students at Risk of Dropout: A Case Study
    Lottering, Roderick
    Hans, Robert
    Lall, Manoj
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (10) : 417 - 422
  • [34] Determination of disease risk factors using binary data envelopment analysis and logistic regression analysis (case study: a stroke risk factors)
    Gholamazad, Maedeh
    Pourmahmoud, Jafar
    Atashi, Alireza
    Farhoudi, Mehdi
    Anvari, Reza Deljavan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2024, 19 (02) : 693 - 714
  • [35] Risk Factor Prediction by Naive Bayes Classifier, Logistic Regression Models, Various Classification and Regression Machine Learning Techniques
    Kannan K.
    Menaga A.
    [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2022, 92 (1) : 63 - 79
  • [36] A machine learning autism classification based on logistic regression analysis
    Fadi Thabtah
    Neda Abdelhamid
    David Peebles
    [J]. Health Information Science and Systems, 7
  • [37] A machine learning autism classification based on logistic regression analysis
    Thabtah, Fadi
    Abdelhamid, Neda
    Peebles, David
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATION SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 7 (1)
  • [38] Identifying Risk Factors for Complicated Post-operative Course in Tetralogy of Fallot Using a Machine Learning Approach
    Faerber, Jennifer A.
    Huang, Jing
    Zhang, Xuemei
    Song, Lihai
    DeCost, Grace
    Mascio, Christopher E.
    Ravishankar, Chitra
    O'Byrne, Michael L.
    Naim, Maryam Y.
    Kawut, Steven M.
    Goldmuntz, Elizabeth
    Mercer-Rosa, Laura
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [39] A logistic regression analysis of risk factors for ischemic colitis
    Wu, Changcai
    Shu, Jianchang
    Ye, Guorong
    Fu, Meiya
    Deng, Yanmei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 828 - 828
  • [40] Structure Learning for Relational Logistic Regression: An Ensemble Approach
    Ramanan, Nandini
    Kunapuli, Gautam
    Khot, Tushar
    Fatemi, Bahare
    Kazemi, Seyed Mehran
    Poole, David
    Kersting, Kristian
    Natarajan, Sriraam
    [J]. SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING, 2018, : 661 - 662