Machine Learning: An Approach in Identifying Risk Factors for Coercion Compared to Binary Logistic Regression

被引:24
|
作者
Hotzy, Florian [1 ]
Theodoridou, Anastasia [1 ]
Hoff, Paul [1 ]
Schneeberger, Andres R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Seifritz, Erich [1 ]
Olbrich, Sebastian [1 ]
Jaeger, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Psychiat Zurich, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Psychiat Dienste Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel, Univ Psychiat Kliniken Basel, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, New York, NY USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2018年 / 9卷
关键词
coercion; seclusion; restraint; coercive medication; involuntary hospitalization; machine learning; PSYCHIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE; INPATIENT CARE; RESTRAINT; SECLUSION; PATIENT; HOSPITALS; FREQUENCY; VIOLENCE; STAFF; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00258
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although knowledge about negative effects of coercive measures in psychiatry exists, its prevalence is still high in clinical routine. This study aimed at define risk factors and test machine learning algorithms for their accuracy in the prediction of the risk to being subjected to coercive measures. Methods: In a sample of involuntarily hospitalized patients (n = 393) at the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, we analyzed risk factors for the experience of coercion (n = 170 patients) using chi-square tests and Mann Whitney U tests. We trained machine learning algorithms [logistic regression, Supported Vector Machine (SVM), and decision trees] with these risk factors and tested obtained models for their accuracy via five-fold cross validation. To verify the results we compared them to binary logistic regression. Results: In a model with 8 risk-factors which were available at admission, the SVM algorithm identified 102 out of 170 patients, which had experienced coercion and 174 out of 223 patients without coercion (69% accuracy with 60% sensitivity and 78% specificity, AUC 0.74). In a model with 18 risk-factors, available after discharge, the logistic regression algorithm identified 121 out of 170 with and 176 out of 223 without coercion (75% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 79% specificity, AUC 0.82). Discussion: Incorporating both clinical and demographic variables can help to estimate the risk of experiencing coercion for psychiatric patients. This study could show that trained machine learning algorithms are comparable to binary logistic regression and can reach a good or even excellent area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of the outcome coercion/no coercion when cross validation is used. Due to the better generalizability machine learning is a promising approach for further studies, especially when more variables are analyzed. More detailed knowledge about individual risk factors may help to prevent the occurrence of situations involving coercion.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RISK FACTORS AFFECTING THE REOCCURRENCE OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A BINARY LOGISTIC REGRESSION APPROACH
    Hady, Dina Hassan Abdel
    [J]. JP JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2014, 11 (01) : 69 - 88
  • [2] Risk factors for temporomandibular disorder: Binary logistic regression analysis
    Magalhaes, Bruno-Gama
    de-Sousa, Stephanie-Trajano
    de Mello, Victor-Villaa-Cardoso
    da-Silva-Barbosa, Andre-Cavalcante
    de-Assis-Morais, Mariana-Pacheco-Lima
    Barbosa-Vasconcelos, Marcia-Maria-Vendiciano
    Caldas-Junior, Arnaldo-de-Franca
    [J]. MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2014, 19 (03): : E232 - E236
  • [3] HRLR-LOGISTIC: A Factor Selection Machine Learning Method Coupled with Binary Logistic Regression
    Xie, Haoyan
    Sadiq, Maryam
    Huang, Hai
    Sarwar, Sughra
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [4] Identifying Environmental and Social Factors Predisposing to Pathological Gambling Combining Standard Logistic Regression and Logic Learning Machine
    Stefano Parodi
    Corrado Dosi
    Antonella Zambon
    Enrico Ferrari
    Marco Muselli
    [J]. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2017, 33 : 1121 - 1137
  • [5] Identifying Environmental and Social Factors Predisposing to Pathological Gambling Combining Standard Logistic Regression and Logic Learning Machine
    Parodi, Stefano
    Dosi, Corrado
    Zambon, Antonella
    Ferrari, Enrico
    Muselli, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 2017, 33 (04) : 1121 - 1137
  • [6] Identifying the Predictive Factors of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response: A Comparative Study Using Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Analysis
    Tang, Haipeng
    Tao, Ningchao
    Zhang, Chaoyang
    Zou, Jiangang
    Zhou, Weihua
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [7] Identifying Robust Risk Factors for Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: An Evolutionary Machine Learning Approach
    Kokkotis, Christos
    Moustakidis, Serafeim
    Baltzopoulos, Vasilios
    Giakas, Giannis
    Tsaopoulos, Dimitrios
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [8] Performance assessment of machine learning and logistic regression in identifying risk factors for diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 diabetes using electronic health records data
    Li, Lin
    Lee, Chuang-Chung
    Wu, Chuntao
    Zhou, Fang Liz
    Molony, Cliona
    Doder, Zoran
    Zalmover, Evgeny
    Sharma, Kristen
    Juhaeri, Juhaeri
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 333 - 333
  • [9] Logistic Regression for Machine Learning in Process Tomography
    Rymarczyk, Tomasz
    Kozlowski, Edward
    Klosowski, Grzegorz
    Niderla, Konrad
    [J]. SENSORS, 2019, 19 (15)
  • [10] IDENTIFYING FACTORS FOR ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT USING LOGISTIC REGRESSION
    Santos, B.
    Goncalves, J.
    Almeida, P. G.
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 4071 - 4078