The safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (<48 hours) for patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Randial Perez, Leonardo Jose [1 ]
Fernando Parra, Juan [1 ]
Aldana Dimas, Guillermo [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp San Jose, FUCS, Bogota, Colombia
[2] FUCS, Unidad Trasplantes Hosp San Jose, Bogota, Colombia
来源
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA | 2014年 / 92卷 / 02期
关键词
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Mild gallstone pancreatitis; Safety; PERIPANCREATIC FLUID COLLECTIONS; BILIARY PANCREATITIS; HOSPITAL STAY; MODERATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.01.024
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy decreases the risk of recurrence. This should be performed during the initial hospitalization, but even when this is performed, the hospital stay can be prolonged, with an increase in costs and morbidity. The aim of this study is to compare the complication rate between patients who underwent an early cholecystectomy (<48 hours) vs. a late one (>48 hours). Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed in the following data bases: PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS and Scielo. Articles on patients with acute, mild gallstone pancreatitis who required a cholecystectomy during their initial hospitalization were included and compared with those undergoing a late cholecystectomy, in order to evaluate the complications, number of days of hospitalization and need for readmission. The quality of the studies and the risks of bias were evaluated. Results: A total of 580 articles and summaries were identified which included 3 observational studies and a randomized clinical trial. A total of 636 patients who underwent a cholecystectomy during the initial hospitalization were included,. Ten of 207 (4.83%) in the early cholecystectomy group showed some type of complication, and 19 of 429 (4.42%) in the late cholecystectomy group, with a risk difference of -0.0016 IC 95% ([-0.04]-0.04). Three of the included studies should be considered of low quality and one of high quality. No publication bias was evidenced. Conclusion: No differences in complication rate were found between patients who underwent an early cholecystectomy versus a late cholecystectomy; nevertheless, further studies should be carried out in order to confirm these findings. (C) 2013 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 113
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamarajah, Sivesh K.
    Karri, Santhosh
    Bundred, James R.
    Evans, Richard P. T.
    Lin, Aaron
    Kew, Tania
    Ekeozor, Chinenye
    Powell, Susan L.
    Singh, Pritam
    Griffiths, Ewen A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (11): : 4727 - 4740
  • [32] Benefits and risks of using laparoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Edebo, Anders
    Andersson, John
    Gustavsson, Joss
    Jivegard, Lennart
    Ribokas, Darius
    Svanberg, Therese
    Wallerstedt, Susanna M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (09): : 5096 - 5107
  • [33] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sedaghat, Negin
    Cao, Amy M.
    Eslick, Guy D.
    Cox, Michael R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (02): : 673 - 679
  • [34] Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Thakur, Varsha
    Schlachta, Christopher M.
    Jayaraman, Shiva
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 253 (02) : 244 - 258
  • [35] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Negin Sedaghat
    Amy M. Cao
    Guy D. Eslick
    Michael R. Cox
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 673 - 679
  • [36] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS MINILAPAROTOMY IN CHOLELITHIASIS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Vilela Castro, paula Marcela
    Akerman, Denise
    Munhoz, Carolina Brito
    do Sacramento, Iara
    Mazzurana, Monica
    Alvarez, Guines Antunes
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 27 (02): : 148 - 153
  • [37] Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of failure
    Balciscueta, Izaskun
    Barbera, Ferran
    Lorenzo, Javier
    Martinez, Susana
    Sebastian, Maria
    Balciscueta, Zutoia
    SURGERY, 2021, 170 (02) : 373 - 382
  • [38] Same-admission versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lyu, Yun-Xiao
    Cheng, Yun-Xiao
    Jin, Hang-Fei
    Jin, Xin
    Cheng, Bin
    Lu, Dian
    BMC SURGERY, 2018, 18
  • [39] Same-admission versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yun-Xiao Lyu
    Yun-Xiao Cheng
    Hang-Fei Jin
    Xin Jin
    Bin Cheng
    Dian Lu
    BMC Surgery, 18