The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity

被引:46
|
作者
Neubauer, David [1 ]
Ferrachat, Sylvaine [1 ]
Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe [2 ]
Stier, Philip [3 ]
Partridge, Daniel G. [4 ]
Tegen, Ina [5 ]
Bey, Isabelle [2 ,7 ]
Stanelle, Tanja [1 ]
Kokkola, Harri [6 ]
Lohmann, Ulrike [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, C2SM, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Phys, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Exeter, Devon, England
[5] Leibniz Inst Tropospher Res, Leipzig, Germany
[6] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Kuopio, Finland
[7] MeteoSwiss, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 芬兰科学院; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL; DUST ICE NUCLEI; MIXED-PHASE; CONVECTIVE CLOUDS; ECHAM-HAM; PARAMETERIZATION; PRECIPITATION; MODIS; SIZE; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-12-3609-2019
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3 (E63H23) as well as the previous model versions ECHAM5.5-HAM2.0 (E55H20) and ECHAM6.1-HAM2.2 (E61H22) are evaluated using global observational datasets for clouds and precipitation. In E63H23, the amount of low clouds, the liquid and ice water path, and cloud radiative effects are more realistic than in previous model versions. E63H23 has a more physically based aerosol activation scheme, improvements in the cloud cover scheme, changes in the detrainment of convective clouds, changes in the sticking efficiency for the accretion of ice crystals by snow, consistent ice crystal shapes throughout the model, and changes in mixed-phase freezing; an inconsistency in ice crystal number concentration (ICNC) in cirrus clouds was also removed. Common biases in ECHAM and in E63H23 (and in previous ECHAM-HAM versions) are a cloud amount in stratocumulus regions that is too low and deep convective clouds over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans that form too close to the continents (while tropical land precipitation is underestimated). There are indications that ICNCs are overestimated in E63H23. Since clouds are important for effective radiative forcing due to aerosol-radiation and aerosol-cloud interactions (ERFari+aci) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), differences in ERFari+aci and ECS between the model versions were also analyzed. ERFari+aci is weaker in E63H23 (-1.0 W m(-2)) than in E61H22 (-1.2 W m(-2)) (or E55H20; -1.1 W m(-2)). This is caused by the weaker shortwave ERFari+aci (a new aerosol activation scheme and sea salt emission parameterization in E63H23, more realistic simulation of cloud water) overcompensating for the weaker longwave ERFari+aci (removal of an inconsistency in ICNC in cirrus clouds in E61H22). The decrease in ECS in E63H23 (2.5 K) compared to E61H22 (2.8 K) is due to changes in the entrainment rate for shallow convection (affecting the cloud amount feedback) and a stronger cloud phase feedback. Experiments with minimum cloud droplet number concentrations (CDNCmin) of 40 cm(-3) or 10 cm(-3) show that a higher value of CDNCmin reduces ERFari+aci as well as ECS in E63H23.
引用
收藏
页码:3609 / 3639
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 1: Aerosol evaluation
    Tegen, Ina
    Neubauer, David
    Ferrachat, Sylvaine
    Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe
    Bey, Isabelle
    Schutgens, Nick
    Stier, Philip
    Watson-Parris, Duncan
    Stanelle, Tanja
    Schmidt, Hauke
    Rast, Sebastian
    Kokkola, Harri
    Schultz, Martin
    Schroeder, Sabine
    Daskalakis, Nikos
    Barthel, Stefan
    Heinold, Bernd
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (04) : 1643 - 1677
  • [2] Aerosol activation and cloud processing in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Roelofs, G. J.
    Stier, P.
    Feichter, J.
    Vignati, E.
    Wilson, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 : 2389 - 2399
  • [3] BVOC-aerosol-climate interactions in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2
    Makkonen, R.
    Asmi, A.
    Kerminen, V. -M.
    Boy, M.
    Arneth, A.
    Guenther, A.
    Kulmala, M.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (21) : 10077 - 10096
  • [4] The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Stier, P
    Feichter, J
    Kinne, S
    Kloster, S
    Vignati, E
    Wilson, J
    Ganzeveld, L
    Tegen, I
    Werner, M
    Balkanski, Y
    Schulz, M
    Boucher, O
    Minikin, A
    Petzold, A
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2005, 5 : 1125 - 1156
  • [5] The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations
    Zhang, K.
    O'Donnell, D.
    Kazil, J.
    Stier, P.
    Kinne, S.
    Lohmann, U.
    Ferrachat, S.
    Croft, B.
    Quaas, J.
    Wan, H.
    Rast, S.
    Feichter, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (19) : 8911 - 8949
  • [6] Aerosol nucleation and its role for clouds and Earth's radiative forcing in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Kazil, J.
    Stier, P.
    Zhang, K.
    Quaas, J.
    Kinne, S.
    O'Donnell, D.
    Rast, S.
    Esch, M.
    Ferrachat, S.
    Lohmann, U.
    Feichter, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (22) : 10733 - 10752
  • [7] Aerosol indirect effects from shipping emissions: sensitivity studies with the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM
    Peters, K.
    Stier, P.
    Quaas, J.
    Grassl, H.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (13) : 5985 - 6007
  • [8] Updates in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM and their effects
    Zhang, K.
    Feichter, J.
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 73 (13) : A1506 - A1506
  • [9] The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6-HAM2
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    Neubauer, David
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (12) : 8807 - 8828
  • [10] An improvement on the dust emission scheme in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Cheng, T.
    Peng, Y.
    Feichter, J.
    Tegen, I.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (04) : 1105 - 1117