Aerosol indirect effects from shipping emissions: sensitivity studies with the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM

被引:22
|
作者
Peters, K. [1 ,2 ]
Stier, P. [3 ]
Quaas, J. [4 ]
Grassl, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Int Max Planck Res Sch Earth Syst Modelling, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Phys, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[4] Univ Leipzig, Inst Meteorol, Leipzig, Germany
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CLOUD CONDENSATION NUCLEI; UPDATED EMISSIONS; SULFATE AEROSOL; BLACK CARBON; IMPACT; PARAMETERIZATION; MICROPHYSICS; SHIPS; NUCLEATION; SATELLITE;
D O I
10.5194/acp-12-5985-2012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, we employ the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM to globally assess aerosol indirect effects (AIEs) resulting from shipping emissions of aerosols and aerosol precursor gases. We implement shipping emissions of sulphur dioxide (SO2), black carbon (BC) and particulate organic matter (POM) for the year 2000 into the model and quantify the model's sensitivity towards uncertainties associated with the emission parameterisation as well as with the shipping emissions themselves. Sensitivity experiments are designed to investigate (i) the uncertainty in the size distribution of emitted particles, (ii) the uncertainty associated with the total amount of emissions, and (iii) the impact of reducing carbonaceous emissions from ships. We use the results from one sensitivity experiment for a detailed discussion of shipping-induced changes in the global aerosol system as well as the resulting impact on cloud properties. From all sensitivity experiments, we find AIEs from shipping emissions to range from -0.32 +/- 0.01 W m(-2) to -0.07 +/- 0.01 W m(-2) (global mean value and inter-annual variability as a standard deviation). The magnitude of the AIEs depends much more on the assumed emission size distribution and subsequent aerosol microphysical interactions than on the magnitude of the emissions themselves. It is important to note that although the strongest estimate of AIEs from shipping emissions in this study is relatively large, still much larger estimates have been reported in the literature before on the basis of modelling studies. We find that omitting just carbonaceous particle emissions from ships favours new particle formation in the boundary layer. These newly formed particles contribute just about as much to the CCN budget as the carbonaceous particles would, leaving the globally averaged AIEs nearly unaltered compared to a simulation including carbonaceous particle emissions from ships.
引用
收藏
页码:5985 / 6007
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aerosol indirect effects from shipping emissions: sensitivity studies with the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM (vol 12, pg 5985, 2012)
    Peters, K.
    Stier, P.
    Quaas, J.
    Grassl, H.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2013, 13 (13) : 6429 - 6430
  • [2] The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations
    Zhang, K.
    O'Donnell, D.
    Kazil, J.
    Stier, P.
    Kinne, S.
    Lohmann, U.
    Ferrachat, S.
    Croft, B.
    Quaas, J.
    Wan, H.
    Rast, S.
    Feichter, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (19) : 8911 - 8949
  • [3] The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Stier, P
    Feichter, J
    Kinne, S
    Kloster, S
    Vignati, E
    Wilson, J
    Ganzeveld, L
    Tegen, I
    Werner, M
    Balkanski, Y
    Schulz, M
    Boucher, O
    Minikin, A
    Petzold, A
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2005, 5 : 1125 - 1156
  • [4] Updates in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM and their effects
    Zhang, K.
    Feichter, J.
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 73 (13) : A1506 - A1506
  • [5] Aerosol activation and cloud processing in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Roelofs, G. J.
    Stier, P.
    Feichter, J.
    Vignati, E.
    Wilson, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 : 2389 - 2399
  • [6] BVOC-aerosol-climate interactions in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2
    Makkonen, R.
    Asmi, A.
    Kerminen, V. -M.
    Boy, M.
    Arneth, A.
    Guenther, A.
    Kulmala, M.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (21) : 10077 - 10096
  • [7] The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 1: Aerosol evaluation
    Tegen, Ina
    Neubauer, David
    Ferrachat, Sylvaine
    Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe
    Bey, Isabelle
    Schutgens, Nick
    Stier, Philip
    Watson-Parris, Duncan
    Stanelle, Tanja
    Schmidt, Hauke
    Rast, Sebastian
    Kokkola, Harri
    Schultz, Martin
    Schroeder, Sabine
    Daskalakis, Nikos
    Barthel, Stefan
    Heinold, Bernd
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (04) : 1643 - 1677
  • [8] The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity
    Neubauer, David
    Ferrachat, Sylvaine
    Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe
    Stier, Philip
    Partridge, Daniel G.
    Tegen, Ina
    Bey, Isabelle
    Stanelle, Tanja
    Kokkola, Harri
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (08) : 3609 - 3639
  • [9] Emission-induced nonlinearities in the global aerosol system: Results from the ECHAM5-HAM aerosol-climate model
    Stier, Philip
    Feichter, Johann
    Kloster, Silvia
    Vignati, Elisabetta
    Wilson, Julian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (16) : 3845 - 3862
  • [10] An improvement on the dust emission scheme in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Cheng, T.
    Peng, Y.
    Feichter, J.
    Tegen, I.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (04) : 1105 - 1117