The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: A quantile regression evidence

被引:200
|
作者
Awosusi, Abraham Ayobamiji [1 ]
Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday [2 ]
Altuntas, Mehmet [3 ]
Agyekum, Ephraim Bonah [4 ]
Zawbaa, Hossam M. [5 ,6 ]
Kamel, Salah [7 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey
[2] Cyprus Int Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Mersin 10, Nicosia, Turkey
[3] Nisantasi Univ, Fac Econ, Dept Econ, Adm & Social Sci, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Ural Fed Univ, Dept Nucl & Renewable Energy, 19 Mira St, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia
[5] Beni Suef Univ, Fac Comp & Artificial Intelligence, Bani Suwayf, Egypt
[6] Technol Univ Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Aswan Univ, Fac Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Aswan 81542, Egypt
关键词
Biomass energy consumption; Economic growth; Globalization; Ecological footprint; BRICS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; GROWTH; GLOBALIZATION; COUNTRIES; NEXUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.022
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Many emerging economies, including the BRICS economies, are having difficulty meeting the Sustainable Development Goals' (SDGs) objectives. Consequently, this research discusses the creation of an SDG framework for the BRICS economies, which can be utilized as a model for other blocs. To achieve this purpose, this research probes into the effect of biomass energy usage on ecological footprint in the BRICS economies between 1992 and 2018, considering the roles of gross capital formation, natural resources, and globalization. The novel Methods of Moments-Quantile-Regression (MMQR) approach with fixed effects is used, the outcomes of which reveal that in all quantiles (10th to 90th), globalization and biomass energy use mitigate environmental degradation, whereas economic growth, natural resources, and gross capital formation contribute to environmental degradation. The present research applied a series of techniques such as panel FMOLS, and DOLS, FE-OLS, the outcomes of which disclosed that globalization and biomass energy utilization help mitigate environmental degradation, while economic growth, natural resources, and gross capital formation improve environmental degradation. On the basis of the study's findings, we suggest a shift in energy policies away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy alternatives by taking measures regarding the innovation of biomass to improve conversion efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1979 / 1994
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The ecological footprint facing asymmetric natural resources challenges: evidence from the USA
    Caglar, Abdullah Emre
    Yavuz, Ersin
    Mert, Mehmet
    Kilic, Emre
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (07) : 10521 - 10534
  • [22] Does agriculture, forests, and energy consumption foster the carbon emissions and ecological footprint? fresh evidence from BRICS economies
    Yasin, Iftikhar
    Ahmad, Nawaz
    Amin, Saqib
    Sattar, Nyla
    Hashmat, Afsheen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [23] Greening the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) economies: Assessing the impact of electricity consumption, natural resources, and renewable energy on environmental footprint
    Jahanger, Atif
    Awan, Ashar
    Anwar, Ahsan
    Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2023, 47 (03) : 484 - 503
  • [24] The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Jiang, Ping
    Majeed, Abdul
    Umar, Muhammad
    Khan, Zeeshan
    Muhammad, Sulaman
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69
  • [25] Does foreign direct investments impair the ecological footprint? New evidence from the panel quantile regression
    Mohammad Ashraful Ferdous Chowdhury
    Peal Ahamed Shanto
    Afsana Ahmed
    Rabeya Hossain Rumana
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 14372 - 14385
  • [26] Does foreign direct investments impair the ecological footprint? New evidence from the panel quantile regression
    Chowdhury, Mohammad Ashraful Ferdous
    Shanto, Peal Ahamed
    Ahmed, Afsana
    Rumana, Rabeya Hossain
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (12) : 14372 - 14385
  • [27] On the factors influencing the ecological footprint: using an asymmetric quantile regression approach
    Alqaralleh, Huthaifa
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2024, 35 (01) : 220 - 247
  • [28] The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries
    Kongbuamai, Nattapan
    Bui, Quocviet
    Yousaf, Hafiz Muhammad Abaid Ullah
    Liu, Yun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (16) : 19251 - 19264
  • [29] The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries
    Nattapan Kongbuamai
    Quocviet Bui
    Hafiz Muhammad Abaid Ullah Yousaf
    Yun Liu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 19251 - 19264
  • [30] The natural resources curse-economic growth hypotheses: Quantile-on-Quantile evidence from top Asian economies
    Haseeb, Muhammad
    Kot, Sebastian
    Hussain, Hafezali Iqbal
    Kamarudin, Fakarudin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279