Collaborative Testing: An Effective Invitational Strategy for High-Stakes Testing in Nursing

被引:12
|
作者
Green, Rebecca [1 ]
Worthey, Terri [2 ]
Kerven, Jenny [3 ]
机构
[1] Atlanta VA Hlth Care Syst, Eagles Nest Community Living Ctr, Decatur, GA USA
[2] South Univ, Coll Nursing & Publ Hlth Online, Savannah, GA USA
[3] Georgia Gwinnett Coll, Dept Math, Lawrenceville, GA USA
关键词
IMPROVES PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS; SKILLS; RETENTION; EDUCATION; GRADES;
D O I
10.3928/01484834-20180420-07
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: A collaborative testing intervention was designed as an application of the invitational education model in an undergraduate nursing course. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of collaborative testing on examination scores and knowledge retention of course content and to evaluate students' feelings about the collaborative testing process. Method: A quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate the effect of collaborative testing on examination scores and knowledge retention among undergraduate nursing students in a public health course (N = 106). A descriptive survey was used to evaluate students' perceptions of the collaborative testing intervention. Results: Collaborative testing increased examination scores and facilitated knowledge retention. Students' perceptions of the intervention were positive. Conclusion: Invitational strategies, such as collaborative testing, may result in measurably better outcomes, such as better examination scores and improved knowledge retention. Rigor does not need to be a barrier to invitational learning and, in fact, it may be complemented and enhanced by it.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 295
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-Stakes Collaborative Testing: Why Not?
    Levine, Ruth E.
    Borges, Nicole J.
    Roman, Brenda J. B.
    Carchedi, Lisa R.
    Townsend, Mark H.
    Cluver, Jeffrey S.
    Frank, Julia
    Morey, Oma
    Haidet, Paul
    Thompson, Britta M.
    [J]. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2018, 30 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [2] ON HIGH-STAKES TESTING
    King, Tom
    [J]. FORTUNE, 2015, 171 (03) : 12 - 12
  • [3] High-Stakes Testing in Nursing Education A Review of the Literature
    Hunsicker, Jamie
    Chitwood, Tara
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATOR, 2018, 43 (04) : 183 - 186
  • [4] The hazards of high-stakes testing
    Shepard, LA
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 19 (02) : 53 - 58
  • [5] HIGH-STAKES TESTING IN KINDERGARTEN
    MEISELS, SJ
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 1989, 46 (07) : 16 - 22
  • [6] Is High-Stakes Testing the Answer?
    Breiner, Jonathan
    [J]. SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, 2015, 115 (03) : 103 - 104
  • [7] Preparing for high-stakes testing
    Gulek, C
    [J]. THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2003, 42 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [8] The use of "high-stakes testing" in nursing education: Rhetoric or rigor?
    Dreher, Heyward Michael
    Glasgow, Mary Ellen Smith
    Schreiber, James
    [J]. NURSING FORUM, 2019, 54 (04) : 477 - 482
  • [9] THE DISTORTION OF TEACHING AND TESTING - HIGH-STAKES TESTING AND INSTRUCTION
    MADAUS, GF
    [J]. PEABODY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 1988, 65 (03): : 29 - 46
  • [10] High-stakes testing and dropout rates
    Shribeg, David
    Burke Shriberg, Amy
    [J]. DISSENT, 2006, 53 (04) : 76 - 80