Erosion Index Derived from Terrain Attributes using Logistic Regression and Neural Networks

被引:20
|
作者
Pike, A. C. [3 ]
Mueller, T. G. [1 ]
Schoergendorfer, A. [2 ]
Shearer, S. A.
Karathanasis, A. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Stat, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[3] Photo Sci, Lexington, KY 40503 USA
关键词
SOIL; RUNOFF; WATER;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2008.0207x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Maps identifying areas prone to channel erosion within agricultural fields could be useful for conservation planners. The objective of this study was to test an approach for creating such maps with logistic regression and neural networks. Survey grade elevation measurements were obtained from on a Central Kentucky farm. The elevation measurements were used to create 4 by 4-m digital elevation models (DEMs) from which terrain attributes were derived. Areas exhibiting evidence of erosion caused by overland water flow sufficient to justify the placement of grassed waterways were identified. The terrain attributes were used as predictor variables and models were fit using the field assessments of soil erosion. Leave-one-field-out validation analysis was conducted to assess the quality of predictions maps. For the models created with logistic regression, an average of 14% of the 4 by 4-m grid cells in noneroded areas were incorrectly classified as being eroded and 16% of cells in eroded areas were incorrectly classified as noneroded. For neural network analysis, these error rates were 15 and 19%, respectively. Most of these errors occurred because the analyses did not exactly define the shapes of the eroded features; however, both logistic regression and neural networks identified most waterway features in all fields. The proposed three-variable logistic regression model for erosion prediction should only be tested with datasets constructed using identical procedures for DEM creation and terrain analysis. This approach could improve the efficiency and accuracy of field site assessments for conservation planning.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1079
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Classification Performance of Neural Networks Versus Logistic Regression Models: Evidence From Healthcare Practice
    Issitt, Richard W.
    Cortina-Borja, Mario
    Bryant, William
    Bowyer, Stuart
    Taylor, Andrew M.
    Sebire, Neil
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [42] Modeling children's mathematical gift by neural networks and logistic regression
    Pavlekovic, Margita
    Bensic, Mirta
    Zekic-Susac, Marijana
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (10) : 7167 - 7173
  • [43] NEURAL Networks and Consumer Behavior: NEURAL Models, Logistic Regression, and the Behavioral Perspective Model
    Greene, Max N.
    Morgan, Peter H.
    Foxall, Gordon R.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYST, 2017, 40 (02): : 393 - 418
  • [44] NEURAL Networks and Consumer Behavior: NEURAL Models, Logistic Regression, and the Behavioral Perspective Model
    Max N. Greene
    Peter H. Morgan
    Gordon R. Foxall
    [J]. The Behavior Analyst, 2017, 40 : 393 - 418
  • [45] Two models for outcome prediction -: A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks
    Linder, R.
    Koenig, I. R.
    Weimar, C.
    Diener, H. C.
    Poeppl, S. J.
    Ziegler, A.
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2006, 45 (05) : 536 - 540
  • [46] Logistic Regression by Means of Evolutionary Radial Basis Function Neural Networks
    Antonio Gutierrez, Pedro
    Hervas-Martinez, Cesar
    Martinez-Estudillo, Francisco J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2011, 22 (02): : 246 - 263
  • [47] Comparison of logistic regression and neural networks to predict rehospitalization in patients with stroke
    Ottenbacher, KJ
    Smith, PM
    Illig, SB
    Linn, RT
    Fiedler, RC
    Granger, CV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (11) : 1159 - 1165
  • [48] Breast cancer predictions by neural networks analysis:: a comparison with logistic regression
    Bourdes, V
    Bonnevay, S.
    Lisboa, P.
    De, France R.
    Chabaud, S.
    Bachelot, T.
    Perol, D.
    Negrier, S.
    [J]. BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2008, 95 : S64 - S65
  • [49] Enrollment Management Model: Artificial Neural Networks versus Logistic Regression
    Gerasimovic, Milica
    Bugaric, Ugljesa
    [J]. APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 32 (02) : 153 - 164
  • [50] Breast cancer predictions by neural networks analysis: a comparison with logistic regression
    Bourdes, V. S.
    Bonnevay, S.
    Lisboa, P. J. G.
    Aung, M. S. H.
    Chabaud, S.
    Bachelot, T.
    Perol, D.
    Negrier, S.
    [J]. 2007 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-16, 2007, : 5424 - +