Flunarizine versus topiramate for chronic migraine prophylaxis: a randomized trial

被引:5
|
作者
Lai, K. -L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Niddam, D. M. [5 ]
Fuh, J. -L. [2 ,3 ]
Chen, S. -P. [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Y. -F. [2 ,3 ]
Chen, W. -T. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Wu, J. -C. [4 ,6 ]
Wang, S. -J. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Municipal Gandau Hosp, Dept Neurol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Neurol Inst, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Brain Sci, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2017年 / 135卷 / 04期
关键词
chronic migraine; flunarizine; prophylaxis; topiramate; DOUBLE-BLIND; MEDICATION-OVERUSE; OPEN-LABEL; LONG-TERM; HEADACHE; EFFICACY; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; GUIDELINE; SAFETY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Chronic migraine (CM) is a prevalent and devastating disorder with limited therapeutic options. This study explored the efficacy of 10mg/d flunarizine for CM prophylaxis as compared with 50 mg/d topiramate. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open--label, blinded--endpoint trial. Patients with CM were randomized to flunarizine and topiramate treatment. The primary outcomes assessed were the reductions in the total numbers of headache days and migraine days after 8 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes were reductions in the numbers of days of acute abortive medication intake and acute abortive medication tablets taken, and the 50% responder rate. Results: Sixty--two subjects were randomized (n= 31/group). Patients treated with flunarizine showed significant reductions in the numbers of total headache days (-4.9 vs -2.3, P=. 012) and migraine days (-4.3 vs -1.4, P=. 001) compared with those treated with topiramate. Patients treated with flunarizine also showed significant reductions in the numbers of days of acute abortive medication intake (-2.3 vs -0.2, P=. 005) and acute abortive medication tablets taken (-4.6 vs - 0.5, P=. 005) and had a higher 50% responder rate in terms of total headache days (58.6% vs 25.9%, P=. 013) and migraine days (75.9% vs 29.6%, P=. 001), compared with topiramate--treated patients. Flunarizine was generally well tolerated and had a safety profile comparable to that of topiramate. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, in an 8--week study, 10 mg/d flunarizine is more effective than 50 mg/d topiramate for CM prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 483
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Topiramate (Topamax) for migraine prophylaxis
    Li, Bing
    Johari, Paniz
    Camacho Ruiz, Carolina
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (11) : 1341 - 1343
  • [42] Topiramate and Propranolol for Prophylaxis of Migraine
    Fallah, Razieh
    Divanizadeh, Mohammad Saleh
    Karimi, Mehran
    Mirouliaei, Mehrdad
    Shamszadeh, Ali
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2013, 80 (11): : 920 - 924
  • [43] Topiramate and Propranolol for Prophylaxis of Migraine
    Razieh Fallah
    Mohammad Saleh Divanizadeh
    Mehran Karimi
    Mehrdad Mirouliaei
    Ali Shamszadeh
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2013, 80 : 920 - 924
  • [44] Flunarizine is more effective than topiramate in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache
    Gracia-Naya, M.
    Hernando-Quintana, N.
    Garcia-Gomara, M. J.
    Sanchez-Valiente, S.
    Rios, C.
    Santos-Lasaosa, S.
    Mauri, J. A.
    Artal-Roy, J.
    Latorre-Jimenez, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2013, 14
  • [45] NIMODIPINE VERSUS FLUNARIZINE IN COMMON MIGRAINE - A CONTROLLED PILOT TRIAL
    BUSSONE, G
    BALDINI, S
    DANDREA, G
    CANANZI, A
    FREDIANI, F
    CARESIA, L
    MILONE, FF
    BOIARDI, A
    HEADACHE, 1987, 27 (02): : 76 - 79
  • [46] A double-blind, randomized trial of low-dose topiramate vs propranolol in migraine prophylaxis
    Ashtari, F.
    Shaygannejad, V.
    Akbari, M.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 118 (05): : 301 - 305
  • [47] Comparison of flunarizine and topiramate for the prophylaxis. of pediatric migraines
    Kim, Hunmin
    Byun, Sung Hwan
    Kim, Jon Soo
    Lim, Byung Chan
    Chae, Jong-Hee
    Choi, Jieun
    Kim, Ki Joong
    Hwang, Yong Seung
    Hwang, Hee
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2013, 17 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [48] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus botulinum toxin injection in chronic migraine prophylaxis: a pilot randomized trial
    Shehata, Hatem S.
    Esmail, Eman H.
    Abdelalim, Ahmad
    El-Jaafary, Shaimaa
    Elmazny, Alaa
    Sabbah, Asmaa
    Shalaby, Nevin M.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 771 - 777
  • [49] α-dihydroergocryptine in the prophylaxis of migraine:: A multicenter double-blind study versus flunarizine
    Bussone, G
    Cerbo, R
    Martucci, N
    Micieli, G
    Zanferrari, C
    Grazzi, L
    Fabbrini, G
    Cavallini, A
    Granella, F
    Ambrosoli, L
    Mailland, F
    Poli, A
    Manzoni, G
    HEADACHE, 1999, 39 (06): : 426 - 431
  • [50] PROPHYLAXIS OF MIGRAINE ATTACKS WITH A CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER - FLUNARIZINE VERSUS METHYSERGIDE
    STEARDO, L
    MARANO, E
    BARONE, P
    DENMAN, DW
    MONTELEONE, P
    CARDONE, G
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 26 (07): : 524 - 528