Incidence of Abnormal Offspring from Cloning and Other Assisted Reproductive Technologies

被引:37
|
作者
Hill, Jonathan R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Vet Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
clone; in vitro fertilization; abnormalities; placenta; fetus; CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER; IN-VITRO SYSTEMS; TRANSFER-DERIVED PREGNANCIES; CLONED TRANSGENIC CALVES; RNAI-MEDIATED KNOCKDOWN; BOVINE EMBRYO CULTURE; ADULT SOMATIC-CELLS; MOUSE EMBRYOS; FETAL-GROWTH; POSTNATAL-GROWTH;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114109
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In animals produced by assisted reproductive technologies, two abnormal phenotypes have been characterized. Large offspring syndrome (LOS) occurs in offspring derived from in vitro cultured embryos, and the abnormal clone phenotype includes placental and fetal changes. LOS is readily apparent in ruminants, where a large calf or lamb derived from in vitro embryo production or cloning may weigh up to twice the expected body weight. The incidence of LOS varies widely between species. When similar embryo culture conditions are applied to nonruminant species, LOS either is not as dramatic or may even be unapparent. Coculture with serum and somatic cells was identified in the 1990s as a risk factor for abnormal development of ruminant pregnancies. Animals cloned from somatic cells may display a combination of fetal and placental abnormalities that are manifested at different stages of pregnancy and postnatally. In highly interventional technologies, such as nuclear transfer (cloning), the incidence of abnormal offspring continues to be a limiting factor to broader application of the technique. This review details the breadth of phenotypes found in nonviable pregnancies, together with the phenotypes of animals that survive the transition to extrauterine life. The focus is on animals produced using in vitro embryo culture and nuclear transfer in comparison to naturally occurring phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 321
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assisted reproductive technologies on the Web
    Niederberger, CS
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (03) : 550 - 552
  • [32] Baboons: Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Champagne, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 48 (05): : 620 - 621
  • [33] Anaesthesia for assisted reproductive technologies
    Ellis, D. B.
    Tsen, L. C.
    [J]. BJA EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (07) : 254 - 259
  • [34] THE ENDOMETRIUM IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
    BIRKENFELD, A
    YEMINI, M
    [J]. CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 18 (12) : 1099 - 1103
  • [35] Microfluidics for assisted reproductive technologies
    Lai, David
    Chiu, Joyce Han-Ching
    Smith, Gary D.
    Takayama, Shuichi
    [J]. RSC Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2015, 2015-January (36): : 131 - 150
  • [36] Assisted reproductive technologies in donkeys
    Rota, A.
    Panzani, D.
    Sabatini, C.
    Camillo, F.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2015, 50 : 31 - 32
  • [37] Are there subtle genome-wide epigenetic alterations in normal offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies?
    Batcheller, April
    Cardozo, Eden
    Maguire, Marcy
    DeCherney, Alan H.
    Segars, James H.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (06) : 1306 - 1311
  • [38] Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technologies
    Pinborg, Anja
    Loft, Anne
    Romundstad, Liv B.
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    Soederstroem-Anttila, Viveca
    Bergh, Christina
    Aittomaeki, Kristiina
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [39] Assisted reproductive technologies in India
    Mukherjee M.
    Nadimipally S.B.
    [J]. Development, 2006, 49 (4) : 128 - 134
  • [40] Assisted reproductive technologies place
    Amar-Hoffet, A.
    Hedon, B.
    Belaisch-Allart, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2010, 39 (08): : S88 - S99