Serum Vitamin D Status and Breast Cancer Risk by Receptor Status: A Systematic Review

被引:18
|
作者
Tommie, Jessica L. [1 ]
Pinney, Susan M. [2 ]
Nommsen-Rivers, Laurie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Rehabil Exercise & Nutr Sci, Coll Allied Hlth Sci, 3202 Eden Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Environm Hlth, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
来源
关键词
PLASMA 25-HYDROXYVITAMIN D; D DEFICIENCY; SUBTYPES; WOMEN; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1080/01635581.2018.1470653
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The association between vitamin D status and breast cancer risk is equivocal. No systematic reviews or meta-analyses have examined this association stratified by receptor status. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review to answer the question, Is there a relationship between lower serum/plasma vitamin D levels and increased risk of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) specifically? Methods: We systematically searched Embase and PubMed databases for published original research studies examining the risk of a breast cancer diagnosis according to vitamin D status. We excluded studies that did not provide risk estimates stratified by receptor status. Results: Fourteen studies met our criteria, including case-control, nested case-control, and case-series studies, reflecting the cumulative results of 13,135 breast cancer cases. When grouped by relevancy to TNBC, the proportion of analyses across all study types showing a significant association between vitamin D status and breast cancer diagnosis was 37% for non-TNBC analyses, 48% for analyses that included some TNBC cases, and 88% for TNBC analyses. Conclusions: Our results suggest that low vitamin D status may particularly increase the risk of TNBC, although more research is needed to determine if this association is causative. Women should be routinely screened for 25(OH)D deficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 820
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evidence of differential effects of vitamin D receptor variants on epithelial ovarian cancer risk by predicted vitamin D status
    Prescott, Jennifer
    Bertrand, KimberlyA.
    Reid, Brett M.
    Permuth-Wey, Jennifer
    De Vivo, Lmmaculata
    Cramer, Daniel W.
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    Tworoger, Shelley S.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2014, 4
  • [42] Maternal Low Vitamin D Status and Risk of Small for Gestational Age: A Systematic Review.
    Wei, Shu Qin
    Bi, Wei Guang
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 24 : 189A - 189A
  • [43] Vitamin D receptor polymorphism and breast cancer risk
    Newcomb, PA
    Kim, H
    Trentham-Dietz, A
    Farin, F
    Hunter, D
    Egan, KM
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2002, 11 (11) : 1503 - 1504
  • [44] Progesterone Receptor Status as a Prognostic Indicator in Oestrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients - A Systematic Review
    Dunne, E.
    Boland, M.
    Bhatt, N.
    Lowery, A.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 187 : S139 - S139
  • [45] Evalution of effect of Vitamin D levels and tumor Vitamin D receptor status as a risk factor and marker for therapeutic response Indian breast cancer patients.
    Singh, Kul Ranjan
    Sonkar, Abhinav Arun
    Saxena, Prarthana
    Kushwaha, Jitendra Kumar
    Agarwal, Akshay Anand
    Husain, Nuzhat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [46] Vitamin D Status and Risk of Breast Cancer in Iranian Women: A Case-Control Study
    Jamshidinaeini, Yasaman
    Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil
    Abdollahi, Morteza
    Ajami, Marjan
    Davoodi, Sayed Hossein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 2016, 35 (07) : 639 - 646
  • [47] Weight Status and Alcohol Intake Modify the Association between Vitamin D and Breast Cancer Risk
    Deschasaux, Melanie
    Souberbielle, Jean-Claude
    Latino-Martel, Paule
    Sutton, Angela
    Charnaux, Nathalie
    Druesne-Pecollo, Nathalie
    Galan, Pilar
    Hercberg, Serge
    Le Clerc, Sigrid
    Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
    Ezzedine, Khaled
    Touvier, Mathilde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2016, 146 (03): : 576 - 585
  • [48] Low Vitamin D Status Is Not Associated With Thyroid Cancer Risk
    Kim, Dohee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2016, 6 (04) : 116 - 122
  • [49] Serum sex hormone levels and hormone receptor status in identifying breast cancer risk in women
    Akalanka, Kasuni H. M.
    Ekanayake, Sagarika
    Samarasinghe, Kamani
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 58 (04) : 525 - 531
  • [50] Associations of vitamin D status with colorectal cancer risk and survival
    Zhou, Jian
    Ge, Xianxiu
    Fan, Xikang
    Wang, Jiayu
    Miao, Lin
    Hang, Dong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 149 (03) : 606 - 614