Steady-state identification, gross error detection, and data reconciliation for industrial process units

被引:47
|
作者
Bhat, SA [1 ]
Saraf, DN [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Proc Control Lab, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ie030563u
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Processing of online data for use with steady-state models requires identification of the existence 14 of a steady state in a process, detection of the presence of gross errors, if any, and data reconciliation to eliminate random measurement noise. The method of Cao and Rhinehart (J. Process Control 1995, 5 (6), 363-374) was modified for steady-state identification by optimizing the filter constants so as to minimize type I and II errors and simultaneously reduce the delay in state detection. A simple algorithm has been presented that makes use of past measurements and the Kalman filter to detect the presence of gross error and estimate its magnitude. This algorithm simultaneously reconciles data for random measurement errors. Another algorithm that makes use of the exponential filter along with the least-squares minimization strategy is also applied for data reconciliation and found to perform equally well. All of these algorithms have been applied to data from an industrial crude distillation unit. The presence of strong autocorrelation in the industrial data was dealt with by adding random noise. This strategy makes the steady-state identification algorithm more suitable for online application.
引用
收藏
页码:4323 / 4336
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Application of data reconciliation and gross error detection techniques to enhance reliability and consistency of the blast furnace process data
    Hazra, Sujan
    Abhale, Prakash
    Nag, Samik
    Mathew, Sam
    Narasimhan, Shankar
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 16 (03)
  • [33] Correntropy based data reconciliation and gross error detection for bilinear systems
    Zhang, Zhengjiang
    Chan, Lester Lik Teck
    Chen, Junghui
    Shao, Zhijiang
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 212 (212)
  • [34] A brief review of recent in data reconciliation and gross error detection/estimation
    Bagajewicz, MJ
    [J]. LATIN AMERICAN APPLIED RESEARCH, 2000, 30 (04) : 335 - 342
  • [35] Data validation and reconciliation for error correction and gross error detection in multiphase allocation systems
    Badings, Thom S.
    van Putten, Dennis S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 195 (195)
  • [36] Simultaneous robust data reconciliation and gross error detection through particle swarm optimiztion for an industrial polypropylene reactor
    Prata, Diego Martinez
    Schwaab, Marcio
    Lima, Enrique Luis
    Pinto, Jose Carlos
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2010, 65 (17) : 4943 - 4954
  • [37] A METHOD TO INCORPORATE BOUNDS IN DATA RECONCILIATION AND GROSS ERROR-DETECTION .2. GROSS ERROR-DETECTION STRATEGIES
    HARIKUMAR, P
    NARASIMHAN, S
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 17 (11) : 1121 - 1128
  • [38] Steady-state optimization algorithm for industrial process control
    Wojcik, Waldemar
    Gromaszek, Konrad
    Kotyra, Andrzej
    [J]. PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2008, 84 (03): : 171 - 173
  • [39] Gross measurements error detection/identification for an industrial ethylene reactor
    Sanchez, M
    Sentoni, G
    Schbib, S
    Tonelli, S
    Romagnoli, J
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 20 : S1559 - S1564
  • [40] Steady-State Data Reconciliation Framework for a Direct Continuous Tableting Line
    Moreno, Mariana
    Liu, Jianfeng
    Su, Qinglin
    Leach, Cody
    Giridhar, Arun
    Yazdanpanah, Nima
    O'Connor, Thomas
    Nagy, Zoltan K.
    Reklaitis, Gintaras V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION, 2019, 14 (03) : 221 - 238