Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang)

被引:41
|
作者
Gao, H. [1 ,2 ]
Chi, X. [1 ,2 ]
Qin, W. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, L. [3 ]
Song, P. [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Z. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, J. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Adaptat & Evolut Plateau Biota, Northwest Inst Plateau Biol, 23 Xinning Rd, Xining 810001, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Bio Resource & Ecoenvironm, Minist Educ, Coll Life Sci, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Qinghai Prov Key Lab Anim Ecol Genom, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
16S rRNA sequencing; captive; gut microbiota; The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang); METABOLISM; EVOLUTION; REGION;
D O I
10.1111/jam.14240
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims The gut microbiota has a great effect on the health and nutrition of the host. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may improve animal health and growth performance. The objectives of our study were to characterize the faecal microbiota between wild and captive Tibetan wild asses and discuss the differences and their reasons. Methods and Results Through high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4-V5 region, we studied the gut microbiota composition and structure of Tibetan wild asses in winter, and analysed the differences between wild and captive groups. The results showed that the most common bacterial phylum in Tibetan wild ass faeces samples was Bacteroidetes, while the phylum Firmicutes was dominant in captive Tibetan wild ass faecal samples. The relative abundance of Firmicutes, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes were significantly higher (P < 0 center dot 01) than in the wild groups. Conclusions Captivity reduces intestinal microbial diversity, evenness and operational taxonomic unit number due to the consumption of industrial food, therefore, increasing the risk of disease prevalence and affecting the health of wildlife. Significance and Impact of the Study We studied the effect of the captive environment on intestinal micro-organisms. This article provides a theoretical basis for the ex-situ conservation of wild animals in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:1869 / 1878
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota Between Wild and Captive Guizhou Snub-Nosed Monkey (Rhinopithecus brelichi)
    Huang, Xiaolong
    Li, Haibo
    Zhang, Lan
    Zhang, Xu
    Cheng, Shaochuan
    Yan, Yuying
    Yang, Wei
    Meng, Bingshun
    Wang, Zuobo
    Zhao, Juanjuan
    Ran, Jingcheng
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [42] Comparative analysis of oral-gut microbiota between captive and wild long-tailed macaque in Thailand
    Vorthon Sawaswong
    Kesmanee Praianantathavorn
    Prangwalai Chanchaem
    Ariya Khamwut
    Taratorn Kemthong
    Yuzuru Hamada
    Suchinda Malaivijitnond
    Sunchai Payungporn
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [43] Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota between Captive and Wild Long-Tailed Gorals for Ex Situ Conservation
    Park, Chang-Eon
    Jo, Young-Jae
    Jung, Da-Ryung
    Park, Hee-Cheon
    Shin, Jae-Ho
    MICROORGANISMS, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [44] Comparative analysis of oral-gut microbiota between captive and wild long-tailed macaque in Thailand
    Sawaswong, Vorthon
    Praianantathavorn, Kesmanee
    Chanchaem, Prangwalai
    Khamwut, Ariya
    Kemthong, Taratorn
    Hamada, Yuzuru
    Malaivijitnond, Suchinda
    Payungporn, Sunchai
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [45] EQUINE SARCOIDS IN CAPTIVE WILD EQUIDS: DIAGNOSTIC AND CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF 16 CASES-A POSSIBLE PREDISPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN COHORT OF SOMALI WILD ASS (EQUUS AFRICANUS SOMALIENSIS)?
    Wenker, Christian
    Hoby, Stefan
    Steck, Beatrice L.
    Ramsauer, Anna Sophie
    Blatter, Sohvi
    Tobler, Kurt
    JOURNAL OF ZOO AND WILDLIFE MEDICINE, 2021, 52 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [46] Comparative study of gut microbiota from captive and confiscated-rescued wild pangolins
    Liu, Chunbing
    Hu, Jingyang
    Wu, Yajiang
    Irwin, David M.
    Chen, Wu
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Yu, Li
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2021, 48 (09) : 825 - 835
  • [47] Diversity and compositional changes in the gut microbiota of wild and captive vertebrates: a meta-analysis
    Alberdi, Antton
    Martin Bideguren, Garazi
    Aizpurua, Ostaizka
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [48] Wild and Captive Environments Drive the Convergence of Gut Microbiota and Impact Health in Threatened Equids
    Zhou, Zhichao
    Tang, Liping
    Yan, Liping
    Jia, Huiping
    Xiong, Yu
    Shang, Jin
    Shao, Changliang
    Zhang, Qiangwei
    Wang, Hongjun
    He, Lun
    Hu, Defu
    Zhang, Dong
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [49] Diversity and compositional changes in the gut microbiota of wild and captive vertebrates: a meta-analysis
    Antton Alberdi
    Garazi Martin Bideguren
    Ostaizka Aizpurua
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [50] Gut microbiota in wild and captive Guizhou snub-nosed monkeys, Rhinopithecus brelichi
    Hale, Vanessa L.
    Tan, Chia L.
    Niu, Kefeng
    Yang, Yeqin
    Zhang, Qikun
    Knight, Rob
    Amato, Katherine R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2019, 81 (10-11)