Interactions between the bloom-forming dinoflagellates Prorocentrum donghaiense and Alexandrium tamarense in laboratory cultures

被引:47
|
作者
Wang, You [1 ]
Yu, Zhiming [1 ]
Song, Xiuxian [1 ]
Zhang, Shandong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Marine Ecol & Environm Sci, Inst Oceanog, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
species interaction; allelochemicals; bloom-forming dinoflagellate; Prorocentrian donghaiense; Alexandrium tamarense;
D O I
10.1016/j.seares.2006.04.002
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Interactions between Prorocentrum donghaiense and Alexandrium tamarens, two bloom-forming dinoflagellates, were investigated using bi-algal cultures. All R donghaiense died, but A. tamarense was hardly affected by the end of the experiment when the initial cell density was set at 1.0 X 10(4) cells mL(-1) for P. donghaiense and 0.28 x 10(4) cells mL(-1) for A. tamarense. However, significant growth suppression occurred in either species when the initial cell density of P donghaiense increased to I. 0 X 105 Cells mL(-1) in the bi-algal culture, but no out-competement was observed. The simultaneous assay on the culture filtrates showed that P donghaiense filtrate prepared at a lower initial density (1.0 X 10(4) cells mL(-1)) stimulated growth of the co-cultured A. tanzarense (0.28 x 10(4) cells mL(-1)), but filtrate at a higher initial density (1.0 x 10(5) cells mL(-1)) depressed its growth. The filtrate of A. tamarense at a density of 0.28 x 10(4) cells mL(-1) killed all R donghaiense at a lower density (1.0 x 10(4) cells mL(-1)), but only exhibited an inhibitory effect on it at a higher density (1.0 x 10(5) cells mL(-1)). It is likely that these two species of microalgae interfere with each other mainly by releasing allelochemical substance(s) into the culture medium, and a direct cell-to-cell contact was not necessary for their mutual interaction. The allelopathic test further proved that A. tamarense could affect the growth of co-cultured P. donghaiense by producing allelochemical(s); moreover, A. tamarense culture filtrate at the stationary growth phase (SP) had a strongly inhibitory effect on P donghaiense compared to that at the exponential phase (EP). Results also demonstrated a dose-dependent relationship between the microalgal initial cell density and the degree of the allelopathic effect. The growth of R donghaiense and A. tamarense in the bi-algal cultures was simulated using a mathematical model to quantify the interaction. The estimated parameters from the model showed that the inhibition exerted by A. tamarense on P. donghaiense was about 17 and 8 times stronger than the inhibition P. donghaiense exerted on A. tamarense, when the initial cell density was set at 1.0 X 10(4) and 1.0 X 10(5) cells mL(-1) for P donghaiense, respectively. and 0.28 x 10(4) cells mL(-1) for A. tamarense in the bi-algal cultures. A. tamarense seems to have a survival strategy that is superior to that of P. donghaiense in bi-algal cultures under controlled laboratory conditions. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 26
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interactions between the calanoid copepod Acartia hongi and the bloom-forming dinoflagellates Karenia bicuneiformis and K. selliformis
    Ok, Jin Hee
    Jeong, Hae Jin
    You, Ji Hyun
    Park, Sang Ah
    Kang, Hee Chang
    Eom, Se Hee
    Lee, Moo Joon
    Rho, Jung-Rae
    [J]. MARINE BIOLOGY, 2024, 171 (05)
  • [22] Variability of Prorocentrum donghaiense response to allelopathic action from Alexandrium pacificum in laboratory culture
    Huang, Hongjia
    Gan, Chuqiao
    Huang, Jiahui
    Zou, Chen
    Li, Hongye
    Liu, Jiesheng
    Yang, Weidong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCEANOLOGY AND LIMNOLOGY, 2021, 39 (04) : 1305 - 1315
  • [23] Variability of Prorocentrum donghaiense response to allelopathic action from Alexandrium pacificum in laboratory culture
    Hongjia Huang
    Chuqiao Gan
    Jiahui Huang
    Chen Zou
    Hongye Li
    Jiesheng Liu
    Weidong Yang
    [J]. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2021, 39 : 1305 - 1315
  • [24] Variability of Prorocentrum donghaiense response to allelopathic action from Alexandrium pacificum in laboratory culture
    Hongjia HUANG
    Chuqiao GAN
    Jiahui HUANG
    Chen ZOU
    Hongye LI
    Jiesheng LIU
    Weidong YANG
    [J]. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2021, 39 (04) : 1305 - 1315
  • [25] 3-Indoleacrylic acid from canola straw as a promising antialgal agent - Inhibition effect and mechanism on bloom-forming Prorocentrum donghaiense
    Effiong, Kokoette
    Hu, Jing
    Xu, Caicai
    Zhang, Yiyi
    Yu, Shumiao
    Tang, Tao
    Huang, Yuzhou
    Lu, Yongliang
    Li, Wei
    Zeng, Jiangning
    Xiao, Xi
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2022, 178
  • [26] DYNAMICS OF BENTHIC BLOOM-FORMING DINOFLAGELLATES: ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AND INTERSPECIFIC RELATIONS
    Fricke, Anna
    Jauzein , Cecile
    Lemee, Rodolphe
    Mangialajo, Luisa
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 2015, 50 : 192 - 193
  • [27] Impact of light and nutrient availability on the phagotrophic activity of harmful bloom-forming dinoflagellates
    Mena, Catalina
    Long, Marc
    Lorand, Ophelie
    Malestroit, Pascale
    Rabiller, Emilie
    Maguer, Jean-Francois
    L'helguen, Stephane
    De Gioux, Aurore Regaudie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [28] Misidentifications of the bloom-forming dinoflagellates Gymnodinium litorale and Margalefidinium polykrikoides in the Mediterranean Sea
    Gomez, Fernando
    Roselli, Leonilde
    Zhang, Huan
    Lin, Senjie
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2024, 70
  • [29] Allelopathic effects of Ulva lactuca on selected species of harmful bloom-forming microalgae in laboratory cultures
    Nan, Chunrong
    Zhang, Haizhi
    Lin, Shaozhen
    Zhao, Guangqiang
    Liu, Xueying
    [J]. AQUATIC BOTANY, 2008, 89 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [30] Ichthyotoxicity of bloom-forming dinoflagellates in an Egyptian saline lake: potential role of PUFA
    Mohamed, Zakaria A.
    Mostafa, Yasser
    Alamri, Saad
    Hashem, Mohamed
    Alrumman, Sulaiman
    [J]. ECOHYDROLOGY & HYDROBIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (02) : 261 - 271