Carotid artery stenosis:: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography

被引:21
|
作者
Sundgren, PC
Sundén, P
Lindgren, A
Lanke, J
Holtås, S
Larsson, EM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Radiol, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Neurol, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Stat, Lund, Sweden
关键词
carotid arteries; stenosis; magnetic resonance contrast enhancement; magnetic resonance angiography; digital subtraction angiography;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-002-0789-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) is a non-invasive alternative to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). CE MRA is increasingly used as a complement to Duplex in the preoperative assessment of carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine if CE MRA could replace preoperative DSA. CE MRA with a scan time of 10 or 28 s was performed in 24 consecutive patients who were scheduled for preoperative DSA because of Duplex-verified severe carotid artery stenosis. Two neuroradiologists measured the degree of stenosis with three different methods, and the image quality was evaluated. DSA was used as the gold standard. For detection of severe stenosis (N. American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (NASCET) greater than or equal to70%; European symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (ECST) greater than or equal to80%; common carotid artery method (CCAM) greater than or equal to80%), the sensitivity of CE MRA maximum intensity projection (MIP) compared with DSA was 82%-100%, the specificity was 74%-93% and the accuracy was 77%-90%. The inter-observer agreement was higher, the image quality was better and the intracranial main arteries were better visualized with the 28 s than with the 10 s scan time. The enhancement of the jugular veins seen in 17% of the 10 s scans and in 58% of the patients with the 28 s scans did not interfere with the evaluation of the carotid arteries. CE MRA, preferably with a scan time of 28 s, can replace DSA in the preoperative assessment of most patients with carotid artery stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 599
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the evaluation of rabbit carotid artery
    Wu, RH
    Kallmes, DF
    [J]. RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2005, 18 (5-6): : 529 - 536
  • [42] Hemodialysis access imaging: Comparison of flow-interrupted contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography
    Smits, JHM
    Bos, C
    Elgersma, OEH
    van der Mark, WAMA
    Blankestijn, PJ
    Bakker, CJG
    Zijlstra, JJ
    Kalmijn, S
    Mali, WPTM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (03) : 829 - 834
  • [43] Detection of thrombosis in the portal venous system: Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography
    Kreft, B
    Strunk, H
    Flacke, S
    Wolff, M
    Conrad, R
    Gieseke, J
    Pauleit, D
    Bachmann, R
    Hirner, A
    Schild, HH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [44] Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis
    Link, J
    Brossmann, J
    Grabener, M
    MuellerHuelsbeck, S
    Steffens, JC
    Brinkmann, G
    Heller, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1996, 17 (01) : 89 - 94
  • [45] Grading of Carotid Artery Stenosis in the Presence of Extensive Calcifications: Dual-Energy CT Angiography in Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
    A. Korn
    B. Bender
    H. Brodoefel
    T.-K. Hauser
    S. Danz
    U. Ernemann
    C. Thomas
    [J]. Clinical Neuroradiology, 2015, 25 : 33 - 40
  • [46] Grading of Carotid Artery Stenosis in the Presence of Extensive Calcifications: Dual-Energy CT Angiography in Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
    Korn, A.
    Bender, B.
    Brodoefel, H.
    Hauser, T. -K.
    Danz, S.
    Ernemann, U.
    Thomas, C.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [47] Accuracy of CT Angiography, MR Angiography, and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Grading of Carotid Artery Stenosis: In Comparison with Actual Measurements in an In Vitro Model
    Smith, Jason C.
    Watkins, Gregory E.
    Smith, Douglas C.
    Palmer, Eric W.
    Abou-Zamzam, Ahmed M.
    Zhang, Wayne W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 : 52S - 53S
  • [48] Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis
    Jean Marie U-King-Im
    William Hollingworth
    Rikin A. Trivedi
    Justin J. Cross
    Nicholas J. Higgins
    Martin J. Graves
    Peter J. Kirkpatrick
    Nagui M. Antoun
    Jonathan H. Gillard
    [J]. European Radiology, 2004, 14 : 730 - 735
  • [49] Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis
    U-King-Im, JM
    Hollingworth, W
    Trivedi, RA
    Cross, JJ
    Higgins, NJ
    Graves, MJ
    Kirkpatrick, PJ
    Antoun, NM
    Gillard, JH
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (04) : 730 - 735
  • [50] Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
    Platzek, Ivan
    Sieron, Dominik
    Wiggermann, Philipp
    Laniado, Michael
    [J]. RADIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 2014