Efficiency in the use of phosphorus by common bean genotypes

被引:14
|
作者
Da Silva, Daiana Alves [1 ]
de Fatima Esteves, Jose Antnio [1 ]
Messias, Ueliton [2 ]
Teixeira, Aurelio [1 ]
Ribeiro Goncalves, Joao Guilherme [1 ]
Chiorato, Alisson Fernando [1 ]
Morais Carbonell, Sergio Augusto [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Agron Estado Sao Paulo, Ctr Grain & Fiber, Commom Bean Breeding Program, BR-13075630 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Embrapa Mid North UEP Parnaiba, BR-64006220 Teresina, PI, Brazil
来源
SCIENTIA AGRICOLA | 2014年 / 71卷 / 03期
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Phaseolus vulgaris L; phosphorus nutrition; classification of genotypes for P; hydroponics; P deficiency; PLANT-GROWTH; ACQUISITION; DEFICIENCY; TOLERANCE; NUTRITION;
D O I
10.1590/S0103-90162014000300008
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is frequently grown in weathered soils with low phosphorus (P) availability, and this is one of the main limitations on its production. This study aimed to assess 20 common bean genotypes in a hydroponic system to select the best P concentration for inducing nutritional deficiency and to classify the genotypes in terms of nutrient utilization efficiency. The concentrations of P applied were 8.00, 4.00, 2.00 and 0.05 mg L-1. At 21 days, in the plot subjected to an application of the most severe stress, the 0.05 mg L-1 dose of P, had smaller plant size and early leaf abscission was observed. The 4.00 mg L-1 dose of P was the most efficient in inducing stress for discrimination of cultivars in terms of efficiency of use of P. The following genotypes: IAPAR 81, Carioca Comum, IAC Carioca Tybata, IAC Imperador and G 2333 stood out as being efficient and responsive to P, while the two cultivars DOR 364 and Jalo Precoce were the most inefficient and unresponsive.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:232 / 239
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selection of common bean lines for calcium use efficiency
    Domingues, Lucas da Silva
    Ribeiro, Nerineia Dalfollo
    Andriolo, Jeronimo Luiz
    Della Flora Possobom, Micheli Thaise
    Mezzomo Zemolin, Allan Emanoel
    REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2014, 45 (04): : 767 - 776
  • [32] Response of common bean progenies for water use efficiency
    Lima, Dayane Cristina
    Barbosa Abreu, Angela de Fatima
    Patto Ramalho, Magno Antonio
    CROP BREEDING AND APPLIED BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01):
  • [33] Absorption and use of phosphorus by soybean and common bean crops and by weeds
    Procópio, SDO
    dos Santos, JB
    Pires, FR
    da Silva, AA
    Mendonça, EDS
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2005, 29 (06): : 911 - 921
  • [34] Phosphatase and phytase activities in nodules of common bean genotypes at different levels of phosphorus supply
    Adelson Paulo Araújo
    Claude Plassard
    Jean Jacques Drevon
    Plant and Soil, 2008, 312 : 129 - 138
  • [35] Phosphatase and phytase activities in nodules of common bean genotypes at different levels of phosphorus supply
    Araujo, Adelson Paulo
    Plassard, Claude
    Drevon, Jean Jacques
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2008, 312 (1-2) : 129 - 138
  • [36] SCREENING BEAN CULTIVARS IN RELATION TO HIGHER EFFICIENCY OF PHOSPHORUS USE
    DEOLIVEIRA, IP
    THUNG, M
    KLUTHCOUSKI, J
    AIDAR, H
    DECARVALHO, JRP
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1987, 22 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [37] Phosphorus Use Efficiency of Wheat Genotypes Grown in Calcareous Soils
    Korkmaz, K.
    Ibrikci, H.
    Karnez, E.
    Buyuk, G.
    Ryan, J.
    Ulger, A. C.
    Oguz, H.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2009, 32 (12) : 2094 - 2106
  • [38] Genotypic Variation in Cotton Genotypes for Phosphorus-Use Efficiency
    Iqbal, Asif
    Gui, Huiping
    Zhang, Hengheng
    Wang, Xiangru
    Pang, Nianchang
    Dong, Qiang
    Song, Meizhen
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [39] Genotypic variability in phosphorus use efficiency for symbiotic N2 fixation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
    Vadez, V
    Drevon, JJ
    AGRONOMIE, 2001, 21 (6-7): : 691 - 699
  • [40] Selection of genotypes of common bean for their resistance to common smut
    Rodriguez-Miranda, Odile
    Carlos Rosas-Sotomayor, Juan
    AGRONOMIA MESOAMERICANA, 2010, 21 (02): : 275 - 280