Ecosystem services and disservices of bear foraging on managed timberlands

被引:1
|
作者
Mendia, Shannon M. [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Matthew D. [1 ]
Higley, J. Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt State Univ, Dept Wildlife, Arcata, CA 95521 USA
[2] Hoopa Tribal Forestry, Dept Nat Resources, Hoopa, CA 95546 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2019年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
bear damage; black bear; cavity-nesting birds; cultural ecosystem services; Douglas-fir; economic disservices; ecosystem engineer; ecosystem services; habitat selection; pileated woodpecker; structural complexity; timber volume loss; COMPARING RESOURCE USE; CAVITY-NESTING BIRDS; PILEATED WOODPECKERS; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; FOREST HEALTH; BLACK BEARS; FIR FORESTS; HABITAT USE; CONSERVATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2816
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The literature on ecosystem services has been criticized for inadequately acknowledging culture values and for de-emphasizing economic disservices. While economic loss due to tree damage by American black bears (Ursus americanus, hereafter bears) may negatively affect timber production, it also alters forest structure and habitat that may contribute to forest wildlife diversity, including culturally significant species. We examined the relationship between bear damage to Douglas-fir trees (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii) and response of cavity-nesting birds on the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation. We measured disservices from bear damage by calculating current and future timber revenue loss, and ecosystem services by calculating forest structural complexity, abundance and diversity of cavity-nesting birds, and woodpecker activity. Bear damage was correlated negatively with tree growth and positively with estimated timber loss. Forest structural complexity was positively correlated with bear damage, and cavity-nester abundance and woodpecker foraging activity were positively correlated with forest structural complexity and bear damage. Pileated woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus) and red-breasted sapsuckers (Sphyrapicus ruber) used bear-damaged trees out of proportion to their availability, and pileated woodpeckers selected for more structurally complex sample units. Information from this study advances our understanding of the potential for bear foraging to negatively affect economic revenue and the trade-offs with habitat conditions favoring other important wildlife species. Understanding the costs and benefits of bear damage can help guide management decisions vital to forest managers both on and off tribal lands.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thermal Comfort and Perceptions of the Ecosystem Services and Disservices of Urban Trees in Florence
    Speak, Andrew Francis
    Salbitano, Fabio
    [J]. FORESTS, 2021, 12 (10):
  • [22] Valuation of ecosystem services and disservices at health clinic gardens in South Africa
    Muller, M.
    Cilliers, S. S.
    Niesing, C.
    Bester, P.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2018, 115 : 324 - 324
  • [23] The relative representation of ecosystem services and disservices in South African newspaper media
    McLellan, V.
    Shackleton, C. M.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2019, 15 (01) : 247 - 256
  • [24] Ecosystem services and disservices of meat and dairy production: A systematic literature review
    Merida, Vincent Elijiah
    Cook, David
    Ogmundarson, Olafur
    Daviosdottir, Brynhildur
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 58
  • [25] Ecosystem services and disservices associated with vultures: A systematic review and evidence assessment
    Carucci, Tomaso
    Whitehouse-Tedd, Katherine
    Yarnell, Richard W.
    Collins, Alan
    Fitzpatrick, Fran
    Botha, Andre
    Santangeli, Andrea
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 56
  • [26] Ecosystem Services and Disservices Are Bundled in Simple and Diverse Cover Cropping Systems
    Finney, Denise M.
    Murrell, Ebony G.
    White, Charles M.
    Baraibar, Barbara
    Barbercheck, Mary E.
    Bradley, Brosi A.
    Cornelisse, Sarah
    Hunter, Mitchell C.
    Kaye, Jason P.
    Mortensen, David A.
    Mullen, Christina A.
    Schipanski, Meagan E.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL LETTERS, 2017, 2 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [27] Livestock ecosystem services and disservices in a medium-sized South African town
    Thondhlana, Gladman
    Yose, Papama
    Cockburn, Jessica
    Shackleton, Charlie
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2022, 18 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [28] Examining ecosystem services and disservices through deliberative socio-cultural valuation
    D. S. Baltazar
    J. Labadz
    R. Smith
    A. Telford
    M. Di Bonito
    [J]. SN Social Sciences, 2 (10):
  • [29] Editorial: Ecosystem Services and Disservices Provided by Plant-Feeding Predatory Arthropods
    Pappas, Maria L.
    Broufas, George D.
    Pozzebon, Alberto
    Duso, Carlo
    Waeckers, Felix
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 7
  • [30] Ecosystem services and disservices by birds, bats and monkeys change with macadamia landscape heterogeneity
    Linden, Valerie M. G.
    Grass, Ingo
    Joubert, Elsje
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Weier, Sina M.
    Taylor, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (08) : 2069 - 2078