Influences of Duration of Inspiratory Effort, Respiratory Mechanics, and Ventilator Type on Asynchrony With Pressure Support and Proportional Assist Ventilation

被引:23
|
作者
Vasconcelos, Renata S. [1 ]
Sales, Raquel P. [1 ]
Melo, Luiz H. de P. [1 ]
Marinho, Liegina S. [1 ]
Bastos, Vasco P. D. [1 ]
Nogueira, Andrea da N. C. [1 ]
Ferreira, Juliana C. [2 ]
Holanda, Marcelo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
artificial respiration; respiratory mechanics; COPD; ARDS; mechanical ventilators; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION; ICU VENTILATORS; PERFORMANCE; BENCH; COMPENSATION; SLEEP; MODES; WORK; LOAD;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.05025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is often associated with patient-ventilator asynchrony. Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) offers inspiratory assistance proportional to patient effort, minimizing patient-ventilator asynchrony. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of respiratory mechanics and patient effort on patient-ventilator asynchrony during PSV and PAV plus (PAV+). METHODS: We used a mechanical lung simulator and studied 3 respiratory mechanics profiles (normal, obstructive, and restrictive), with variations in the duration of inspiratory effort: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 s. The Auto-Trak system was studied in ventilators when available. Outcome measures included inspiratory trigger delay, expiratory trigger asynchrony, and tidal volume (V-T). RESULTS: Inspiratory trigger delay was greater in the obstructive respiratory mechanics profile and greatest with a effort of 2.0 s (160 ms); cycling asynchrony, particularly delayed cycling, was common in the obstructive profile, whereas the restrictive profile was associated with premature cycling. In comparison with PSV, PAV+ improved patient-ventilator synchrony, with a shorter triggering delay (28 ms vs 116 ms) and no cycling asynchrony in the restrictive profile. V-T was lower with PAV+ than with PSV (630 mL vs 837 mL), as it was with the single-limb circuit ventilator (570 mL vs 837 mL). PAV+ mode was associated with longer cycling delays than were the other ventilation modes, especially for the obstructive profile and higher effort values. Auto-Trak eliminated automatic triggering. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical ventilation asynchrony was influenced by effort, respiratory mechanics, ventilator type, and ventilation mode. In PSV mode, delayed cycling was associated with shorter effort in obstructive respiratory mechanics profiles, whereas premature cycling was more common with longer effort and a restrictive profile. PAV+ prevented premature cycling but not delayed cycling, especially in obstructive respiratory mechanics profiles, and it was associated with a lower V-T.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 557
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Asynchrony index in pressure support ventilation (PSV) versus neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) during non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for respiratory failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Inderpaul Singh Sehgal
    Sahajal Dhooria
    Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal
    Digambar Behera
    Ritesh Agarwal
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2016, 42 : 1813 - 1815
  • [42] Proportional assist ventilation versus pressure support ventilation in weaning ventilation: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Botha, John
    Green, Cameron
    Carney, Ian
    Haji, Kavi
    Gupta, Sachin
    Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath
    CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2018, 20 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [43] Asynchrony index in pressure support ventilation (PSV) versus neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) during non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for respiratory failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sehgal, Inderpaul Singh
    Dhooria, Sahajal
    Aggarwal, Ashutosh Nath
    Behera, Digambar
    Agarwal, Ritesh
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (11) : 1813 - 1815
  • [44] Response of ventilator-dependent patients to different levels of pressure support and proportional assist
    Giannouli, E
    Webster, K
    Roberts, D
    Younes, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (06) : 1716 - 1725
  • [45] Ventilator Inspiratory Pressure Rise Influences Regional Ventilation in a Simulated Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Lung Model
    Sammour, I. A.
    Chatburn, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [46] Proportional assist ventilation (pav plus ) versus pressure support ventilation (psv) for weaning and patient ventilator interaction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Salama, Suzan
    Mohamed-Hussein, Aliae A. R.
    Gamal, Waleed
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [47] New things are not always better: proportional assist ventilation vs. pressure support ventilation
    Vitacca, M
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (07) : 1038 - 1040
  • [48] New things are not always better: proportional assist ventilation vs. pressure support ventilation
    M. Vitacca
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2003, 29 : 1038 - 1040
  • [49] Respiratory load compensation during mechanical ventilation—proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors versus pressure support
    Eumorfia Kondili
    George Prinianakis
    Christina Alexopoulou
    Eleftheria Vakouti
    Maria Klimathianaki
    Dimitris Georgopoulos
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2006, 32 : 692 - 699
  • [50] Respiratory comfort and breathing pattern during volume proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation:: A study on volunteers with artificially reduced compliance
    Mols, G
    von Ungern-Sternberg, B
    Rohr, E
    Haberthür, C
    Geiger, K
    Guttmann, J
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (06) : 1940 - 1946