Simulation-based optimization methods for setting production planning parameters

被引:51
|
作者
Gansterer, Margaretha [1 ]
Almeder, Christian [2 ]
Hartl, Richard F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Business Adm, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Europa Univ Viadrina Frankfurt Oder, Chair Supply Chain Management, D-15230 Frankfurt, Oder, Germany
关键词
Production planning; Simulation; Optimization; Hierarchical planning; Planning parameters; SAFETY STOCK; HIERARCHICAL PRODUCTION; LEAD TIMES; LOT-SIZE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.10.016
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper refers to a hierarchical production planning system in a make-to-order environment. A challenging task in this context is to determine good production parameter settings in order to benefit from established planning methods. We present a framework for hierarchical production planning which we use to identify good settings for three planning parameters, namely planned leadtimes, safety stock, and lotsizes. Within a discrete-event simulation which mimics the production system we use a mathematical optimization model for replicating the decision problem. This mathematical model is solved to optimality using a standard optimization engine. We use data referring to four different demand market situations in order to derive general statements concerning the quality and sensitivity of the three analyzed planning parameters. For exploring the parameter space we follow the concept of simulation-based optimization. We compare the performance of six different optimization methods to a kind of systematic enumeration of parameter combinations. We show that among these a search procedure based on the idea of Variable Neighborhood Search (VNS) leads to the best results in this context. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 213
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gradient-based production optimization with simulation-based economic constraints
    Oleg Volkov
    Mathias C. Bellout
    [J]. Computational Geosciences, 2017, 21 : 1385 - 1402
  • [32] Adaptive Simulation-Based Optimization for Production Scheduling: A Comparative Study
    Quadras, Djonathan
    Frazzon, Enzo M.
    Mendes, Lucio G.
    Pires, Matheus C.
    Rodriguez, Carlos M. T.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (10): : 424 - 429
  • [33] Searching for Production Robustness Through Simulation-Based Scheduling Optimization
    Vieira, Guilherme Ernani
    Frazzon, Enzo Morosini
    [J]. DYNAMICS IN LOGISTICS (LDIC 2020), 2020, : 351 - 362
  • [34] Simulation-based optimization for the integrated scheduling of production and logistic systems
    Frazzon, Enzo Morosini
    Albrecht, Andre
    Hurtado, Paula Andrea
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2016, 49 (12): : 1050 - 1055
  • [35] A REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON SIMULATION-BASED OPTIMIZATION OF THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN PRODUCTION
    Roemer, Anna Carina
    Strassburger, Steffen
    [J]. 2016 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2016, : 1416 - 1427
  • [36] Simulation-based planning and optimization in multi-echelon supply chains
    Merkuryeva, Galina
    Merkuryev, Yuri
    Vanmaele, Hendrik
    [J]. SIMULATION-TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 87 (08): : 680 - 695
  • [37] Simulation-based optimization using DEA and DOE in production systems
    Monazzam N.
    Alinezhad A.
    Adibi M.A.
    [J]. Scientia Iranica, 2022, 29 (6 E) : 3470 - 3488
  • [38] SIMULATION-BASED BUSINESS GAME FOR TEACHING METHODS IN LOGISTICS AND PRODUCTION
    Hubl, Alexander
    Fischer, Gudrun
    [J]. 2017 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2017, : 4228 - 4239
  • [39] Simulation-based production planning based on logistic monitoring and risk management aspects
    Reinsch, Steffen
    Ouali, Karim
    Stuermann, Jens
    [J]. DIGITAL ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY: PERSPECTIVES AND FUTURE CHALLENGES, 2007, : 309 - +
  • [40] Simulation-based Production Planning and Execution Control for Reconfigurable Assembly Cells
    Gyulai, David
    Pfeiffer, Andras
    Kadar, Botond
    Monostori, Laszlo
    [J]. FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 57 : 445 - 450