Participatory Design of Nature-Based Solutions: Usability of Tools for Water Professionals

被引:5
|
作者
Bogatinoska, Borjana [1 ]
Lansu, Angelique [1 ]
Huge, Jean [1 ]
Dekker, Stefan C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Sci, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst, Dept Environm Sci, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
hydrometeorological hazards; co-design; stakeholders; north-western Europe; decision support; usability index; brook catchment; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLICY; COMPLEXITY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3390/su14095562
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Participatory processes provide opportunities for water professionals such as scientists and policymakers and other stakeholders such as the local communities and farmers to meet, exchange information, deliberate, and share values. There is a diversity of rapidly evolving participatory methods, here defined, as tools for supporting the process of designing nature-based solutions (NbS) together with the stakeholders. However, this requires a systematic and informed selection to facilitate the adequate choice of tools, aligned to the requirements and context of the water professionals and the stakeholders for the design and deployment of NbS. Despite this, there is still little progress and knowledge accumulation on how to select the most context-appropriate tool(s). Consequently, in this research, we propose a stepwise framework for the use of participatory tools, which we categorize as: (i) tools used for defining the hydro-meteorological hazards (HMH) and its impact on stakeholders-knowledge tools (ii) tools used for co-designing NbS with stakeholders-co-creation tools and (iii) tools used for co-implementing the transition towards NbS-transition tools. We then apply and test this stepwise framework on the participatory processes used in eight brook catchments distributed in four countries: the Netherlands, Belgium, France, and the United Kingdom. The framework is designed in steps that would lead to respectively: selecting, classifying, mapping, and grading the participatory tools leading to an informed and systematic decision of a tool or suite of tools for the design and deployment of NbS with stakeholders. With the application of this framework, we see that among the water professionals: (1) knowledge tools are central in the problem definition stage, particularly with non-technical stakeholders; (2) most anticipated co-creation tools are e-Tools/Virtual tools and workshops; (3) transition tools favor visual tools as a way of enabling the transition towards management practices.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trees as Nature-Based Solutions
    Griscom, Bronson
    Jackson, Robert B.
    Konijnendijk, Cecil
    Luyssaert, Sebastiaan
    Friess, Daniel
    Rudee, Alex
    Seddon, Nathalie
    ONE EARTH, 2020, 2 (05): : 387 - 389
  • [22] Nature-based solutions: criteria
    Albert, Christian
    Spangenberg, Joachim H.
    Schroeter, Barbara
    NATURE, 2017, 543 (7645) : 315 - 315
  • [23] Nature-based solutions: sustainable?
    Thomas Schaubroeck
    Nature, 2017, 543 : 315 - 315
  • [24] Justifying nature-based solutions
    Hoffman, Kate Nicole
    BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 38 (05)
  • [25] Nature-based solutions: business
    Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P.
    Kolokotsa, Dionyssia
    Banwart, Steven A.
    NATURE, 2017, 543 (7645) : 315 - 315
  • [26] Justifying nature-based solutions
    Kate Nicole Hoffman
    Biology & Philosophy, 2023, 38
  • [27] Nature-based solutions: criteria
    Christian Albert
    Joachim H. Spangenberg
    Barbara Schröter
    Nature, 2017, 543 : 315 - 315
  • [29] Design experimentation for Nature-based Solutions: Towards a definition and taxonomy
    Moosavi, Sareh
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 138 : 149 - 161
  • [30] Wetlands as nature-based solutions for water management in different environments
    Ferreira, Carla S. S.
    Kasanin-Grubin, Milica
    Solomun, Marijana Kapovic
    Sushkova, Svetlana
    Minkina, Tatiana
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Kalantari, Zahra
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & HEALTH, 2023, 33