System for in-flight airflow measurements of an agricultural aircraft

被引:0
|
作者
Franz, E
Bouse, LF
Brusse, JC
机构
[1] USDA ARS,AERIAL APPLICAT RES UNIT,SO CROPS RES LAB,COLLEGE STN,TX 77845
[2] TEXAS ENGN EXPT STN,COLLEGE STN,TX
来源
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE | 1996年 / 39卷 / 06期
关键词
agricultural aircraft; airflow; measurement; aerial sprating; airflow patterns; airspeed;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Airspeed and the orientation of spray nozzles relative to air direction significantly affect spray droplet size. A measurement system based on pressure probe techniques was developed to measure and record airspeed and airflow direction at spray boom and nozzle locations near the trailing edge of the wings and under the fuselage of a fixed-wing agricultural aircraft. The main feature of the system is an airflow measuring ''rake'' comprised of eight total pressure five-tube probes and two stream pressure probes. The probes are encased in an airfoil. A multiport rotary pneumatic valve is used to rapidly sample the differential (velocity) pressure between the total pressures and stream pressure. The system was calibrated in a wind tunnel for pitch and yaw angles up to +/-25 degrees. Software was developed to control the rotary valve and data acquisition. The system was mounted on a Cessna AgHusky agricultural aircraft for flight testing and wake survey studies. A pitch, yaw, and Pitot tube boom extended forward from the leading edge of the aircraft wingtip provides aircraft attitude and airspeed reference for the rake measurement system. Data collected with this system will provide a basis for adjusting application hardware to obtain improved control of spray droplet size for various aircraft speeds and loadings.
引用
收藏
页码:1961 / 1969
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FUTURE AIRCRAFT MAY USE IN-FLIGHT APUS
    不详
    SAE JOURNAL OF AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, 1973, 81 (05): : 44 - 49
  • [32] In-Flight Contingency Management for Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Pastor, Enric
    Royo, Pablo
    Santamaria, Eduard
    Prats, Xavier
    Barrado, Cristina
    JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION, 2012, 9 (04): : 144 - 160
  • [33] Aircraft health and usage monitoring system for in-flight strain measurement of a wing structure
    Kim, Jin-Hyuk
    Park, Yurim
    Kim, Yoon-Young
    Shrestha, Pratik
    Kim, Chun-Gon
    SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2015, 24 (10)
  • [34] In-flight pressure load measurements and analysis
    Marano, A. D.
    Polito, T.
    Guida, M.
    Barbarino, M.
    Belardo, M.
    Perazzolo, A.
    Marulo, F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING (ISMA2020) / INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS (USD2020), 2020, : 341 - 352
  • [35] In-flight measurements of radiation fields and doses
    Tommasino, L
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1999, 86 (04) : 297 - 301
  • [36] MULTIPATH INTERFERENCE FOR IN-FLIGHT ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS
    BALANIS, CA
    HARTENSTEIN, R
    DECARLO, D
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1984, 32 (01) : 100 - 104
  • [37] In-flight wing deformation measurements on a glider
    Bakunowicz, J.
    Meyer, R.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 120 (1234): : 1917 - 1931
  • [38] METHOD FOR PREDICTING IN-FLIGHT NOISE ON JET AIRCRAFT STRUCTURE
    CHO, ACF
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1959, 31 (01): : 116 - 116
  • [39] ACOUSTIC-EMISSION FOR IN-FLIGHT MONITORING ON AIRCRAFT STRUCTURE
    BAILEY, CD
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 1974, 32 (09) : A31 - A31
  • [40] Prediction of In-flight Aircraft Radar Cross-Section
    Fang Xiang
    Su Donglin
    ISAPE 2008: THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS, PROPAGATION AND EM THEORY, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 524 - 527