Superion® InterSpinous Spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial

被引:18
|
作者
Patel, Vikas V. [1 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [2 ]
Whang, Peter G. [3 ]
Haley, Thomas R. [4 ]
Bradley, W. Daniel [5 ]
Davis, Raphael P. [6 ]
Block, Jon E.
Geisler, Fred H. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Hosp, Spine Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[2] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] Performance Spine & Sports Phys PC, Pottstown, PA USA
[5] Texas Back Inst, Denton, TX USA
[6] Stony Brook Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Stony Brook, NY USA
[7] McLaren Hosp, Petoskey, MI USA
来源
关键词
InterSpinous Spacer; lumbar spinal stenosis; Superion (R); neurogenic claudication; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S92633
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This report provides the 3-year clinical outcomes from the randomized, controlled US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial of the Superion (R) for the treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients and methods: The Superion (R) was evaluated in the treatment of subjects aged 45 years or older suffering from symptoms of intermittent neurogenic claudication, secondary to a confirmed diagnosis of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L1 to L5. Patients were treated between June 2008 and December 2011 at 31 investigational sites. Three hundred ninety-one subjects were included in the randomized study group consisting of 190 Superion (R) and 201 X-STOP (R) control subjects. The primary composite endpoint was individual patient success based on four components: improvement in two of three domains of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, no reoperations at the index level, no major implant/ procedure-related complications, and no clinically significant confounding treatments. Results: At 3 years, the proportion of subjects achieving the primary composite endpoint was greater for Superion (R) (63/ 120, 52.5%) than for X-STOP (R) (49/ 129, 38.0%) (P=0.023) and the corresponding success rates exceeded 80% for each of the individual components of the primary endpoint in the Superion (R) group (range: 81%-91%). Improvements in back and leg pain severity as well as back-and disease-specific functional outcomes were also maintained through 36 months. Conclusion: The 3-year outcomes from this randomized controlled trial demonstrate durable clinical improvement consistently across all clinical outcomes for the Superion (R) in the treatment of patients with moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 662
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effectiveness and safety of interspinous spacer versus decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xin, Jian-Hai
    Che, Jia-Ju
    Wang, Zhe
    Chen, Yu-Ming
    Leng, Bing
    Wang, Da-Lin
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (46) : E36048
  • [22] Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial
    Moojen, Wouter A.
    Arts, Mark P.
    Jacobs, Wilco C. H.
    van Zwet, Erik W.
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    Koes, Bart W.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A. M.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [23] Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Lauryssen, Carl
    Jackson, Robert J.
    Baron, Jeffrey M.
    Tallarico, Richard A.
    Lavelle, William F.
    Deutsch, Harel
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (06) : 763 - 769
  • [24] Quality of Life in the Patients Treated for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Three-Year Follow-up Study
    Nemec, F.
    Ryba, L.
    Repko, M.
    Chaloupka, R.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2010, 77 (06) : 484 - 488
  • [25] Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices
    Tapp, Stephanie J.
    Martin, Brook I.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (04): : 584 - 592
  • [26] RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
    He Zhao
    Li-Jun Duan
    Yu-Shan Gao
    Yong-Dong Yang
    Ding-Yan Zhao
    Xiang-Sheng Tang
    Zhen-guo Hu
    Chuan-Hong Li
    Si-Xue Chen
    Tao Liu
    Xing Yu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13
  • [27] A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results
    Zucherman, JF
    Hsu, KY
    Hartjen, CA
    Mehalic, TF
    Implicito, DA
    Martin, MJ
    Johnson, DR
    Skidmore, GA
    Vessa, PP
    Dwyer, JW
    Puccio, S
    Cauthen, JC
    Ozuna, RM
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2004, 13 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [28] A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results
    J. F. Zucherman
    K. Y. Hsu
    C. A. Hartjen
    T. F. Mehalic
    D. A. Implicito
    M. J. Martin
    D. R. Johnson
    G. A. Skidmore
    P. P. Vessa
    J. W. Dwyer
    S. Puccio
    J. C. Cauthen
    R. M. Ozuna
    European Spine Journal, 2004, 13 : 22 - 31
  • [29] A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Forsth, Peter
    Olafsson, Gylfi
    Carlsson, Thomas
    Frost, Anders
    Borgstrom, Fredrik
    Fritzell, Peter
    Ohagen, Patrik
    Michaelsson, Karl
    Sanden, Bengt
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (15): : 1413 - 1423
  • [30] Retraction Note: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
    He Zhao
    Li-Jun Duan
    Yu-Shan Gao
    Yong-Dong Yang
    Ding-Yan Zhao
    Xiang-Sheng Tang
    Zhen-guo Hu
    Chuan-Hong Li
    Si-Xue Chen
    Tao Liu
    Xing Yu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13