Superion® InterSpinous Spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial

被引:18
|
作者
Patel, Vikas V. [1 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [2 ]
Whang, Peter G. [3 ]
Haley, Thomas R. [4 ]
Bradley, W. Daniel [5 ]
Davis, Raphael P. [6 ]
Block, Jon E.
Geisler, Fred H. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Hosp, Spine Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[2] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] Performance Spine & Sports Phys PC, Pottstown, PA USA
[5] Texas Back Inst, Denton, TX USA
[6] Stony Brook Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Stony Brook, NY USA
[7] McLaren Hosp, Petoskey, MI USA
来源
关键词
InterSpinous Spacer; lumbar spinal stenosis; Superion (R); neurogenic claudication; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S92633
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This report provides the 3-year clinical outcomes from the randomized, controlled US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial of the Superion (R) for the treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients and methods: The Superion (R) was evaluated in the treatment of subjects aged 45 years or older suffering from symptoms of intermittent neurogenic claudication, secondary to a confirmed diagnosis of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L1 to L5. Patients were treated between June 2008 and December 2011 at 31 investigational sites. Three hundred ninety-one subjects were included in the randomized study group consisting of 190 Superion (R) and 201 X-STOP (R) control subjects. The primary composite endpoint was individual patient success based on four components: improvement in two of three domains of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, no reoperations at the index level, no major implant/ procedure-related complications, and no clinically significant confounding treatments. Results: At 3 years, the proportion of subjects achieving the primary composite endpoint was greater for Superion (R) (63/ 120, 52.5%) than for X-STOP (R) (49/ 129, 38.0%) (P=0.023) and the corresponding success rates exceeded 80% for each of the individual components of the primary endpoint in the Superion (R) group (range: 81%-91%). Improvements in back and leg pain severity as well as back-and disease-specific functional outcomes were also maintained through 36 months. Conclusion: The 3-year outcomes from this randomized controlled trial demonstrate durable clinical improvement consistently across all clinical outcomes for the Superion (R) in the treatment of patients with moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 662
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Orndorff, Douglas G.
    Lavelle, William F.
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 104 : 279 - 283
  • [2] Wallis Interspinous Spacer for Treatment of Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation: Three-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gu, Honglin
    Chang, Yunbing
    Zeng, Shixing
    Zheng, Xiaoqing
    Zhang, Ruiying
    Zhan, Shiqiang
    Zhang, Zhongmin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 120 : E1331 - E1336
  • [3] Superion Interspinous Process Spacer for Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication Secondary to Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Whang, Peter G.
    Haley, Thomas R.
    Bradley, W. Daniel
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Davis, Raphael P.
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (05) : 275 - 282
  • [4] Interspinous Spacer Implant in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    PAIN RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 2012
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer
    Parker, Scott L.
    Anderson, Louise H.
    Nelson, Teresa
    Patel, Vikas V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2015, 9
  • [6] Rationale, design and clinical performance of the Superion® Interspinous Spacer: a minimally invasive implant for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Loguidice, Vito
    Bini, Walter
    Shabat, Shay
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2011, 8 (04) : 419 - 426
  • [7] Two-year clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing two interspinous spacers for treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis
    Vikas V Patel
    Peter G Whang
    Thomas R Haley
    W Daniel Bradley
    Pierce D Nunley
    Larry E Miller
    Jon E Block
    Fred H Geisler
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15
  • [8] Two-year clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing two interspinous spacers for treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Whang, Peter G.
    Haley, Thomas R.
    Bradley, W. Daniel
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
  • [9] Interspinous process device versus conventional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial
    Schenck, Catharina D.
    Terpstra, Sietse E. S.
    Moojen, Wouter A.
    van Zwet, Erik
    Peul, Wilco
    Arts, Mark P.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (06) : 909 - 917
  • [10] GOLDIC therapy in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized, controlled trial
    Godek, Piotr
    Szczepanowska-Wolowiec, Beata
    Golicki, Dominik
    REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (10) : 709 - 718