Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Sepsis Guidelines: the optimal management of severe sepsis in Canadian emergency departments

被引:0
|
作者
Green, Robert S. [1 ,2 ]
Djogovic, Dennis [3 ]
Gray, Sara [4 ,5 ]
Howes, Daniel [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Brindley, Peter G. [3 ]
Stenstrom, Robert
Patterson, Edward [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Easton, David [12 ]
Davidow, Jonathan S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Div Crit Care Med, Dept Internal Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Emergency Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Div Emergency Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[5] St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[6] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Kingston Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada
[8] St Pauls Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[9] Univ Saskatchewan, Regina, SK, Canada
[10] Regina QuAppelle Hlth Reg, Dept Internal Med, Regina, SK, Canada
[11] Regina QuAppelle Hlth Reg, Dept Emergency Med, Regina, SK, Canada
[12] Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
关键词
sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock; emergency medicine; guidelines; resuscitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Optimal management of severe sepsis in the ED has evolved rapidly. The purpose of these guidelines is to review key management principles for Canadian emergency physicians, utilizing an evidence-based grading system. Methods: Key areas in the management of septic patents were determined by members of the CAEP Critical Care Interest Group (C4). Members of C4 were assigned a question to be answered after literature review, based on the Oxford grading system. After completion, each section underwent a secondary review by another member of C4. A tertiary review was conducted by additional external experts, and modifications were determined by consensus. Grading was based on peer-reviewed publications only, and where evidence was insufficient to address an important topic, a "practice point" was provided based on group opinion. Results: The project was initiated in 2005 and completed in December 2007. Key areas which were reviewed include the definition of sepsis, the use of invasive procedures, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor/inotrope use, the importance of culture acquisition in the ED, antimicrobial therapy and source control. Other areas reviewed included the use of corticosteroids, activated protein C, transfusions and mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: Early sepsis management in the ED is paramount for optimal patient outcomes. The CAEP Critical Care Interest Group Sepsis Position Statement provides a framework to improve the ED care of this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 459
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2012: Update for Emergency Physicians
    Jones, Alan E.
    Puskarich, Michael A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 63 (01) : 35 - 47
  • [22] Severe sepsis and septic shock: Review of the literature and emergency department management guidelines
    Nguyen, H. Bryant
    Rivers, Emanuel P.
    Abrahamian, Fredrick M.
    Moran, Gregory J.
    Abraham, Edward
    Trzeciak, Stephen
    Huang, David T.
    Osborn, Tiffany
    Stevens, Dennis
    Talan, David A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (01) : 28 - 54
  • [23] Position Statement on Emergency Medicine Definitions from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians
    McEwen, Jill
    Borreman, Stephane
    Caudle, Jaelyn
    Chan, Tom
    Chochinov, Alecs
    Christenson, Jim
    Currie, Tom
    Fuller, Benjamin
    Howlett, Michael
    Koczerginski, Josh
    Kuuskne, Martin
    Lim, Rodrick K.
    McLeod, Bruce
    Pageau, Paul
    Paraskevopoulos, Chryssi
    Rosenblum, Rebeccah
    Stiell, Ian G.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 20 (04) : 501 - 506
  • [24] Sepsis Awareness to Enhance Early Identification of Sepsis in Emergency Departments
    Rajan, Jesvin Jancy
    Rodzevik, Theresa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2021, 52 (01): : 39 - 42
  • [25] Implementation of the survival sepsis campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department
    Antro, C.
    Merico, F.
    Scalabrino, E.
    Noto, P.
    Fascio Pecetto, P.
    Gai, V
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (04) : S67 - S67
  • [26] The epidemiology of adults with severe sepsis and septic shock in Scottish emergency departments
    Gray, Alasdair
    Ward, Kirsty
    Lees, Fiona
    Dewar, Colin
    Dickie, Sarah
    McGuffie, Crawford
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (05) : 397 - 401
  • [27] Pain management of acute appendicitis in Canadian pediatric emergency departments
    Robb, Andrea L.
    Ali, Samina
    Poonai, Naveen
    Thompson, Graham C.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 19 (06) : 417 - 423
  • [28] A survey of sepsis knowledge among Canadian emergency department registered nurses
    Storozuk, Shelly Ann
    MacLeod, Martha L. P.
    Freeman, Shannon
    Banner, Davina
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY CARE, 2019, 22 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [29] Sepsis detection in emergency medicine. Results of an interprofessional survey on sepsis detection in prehospital emergency medicine and emergency departments
    Metelmann, C.
    Metelmann, B.
    Scheer, C.
    Gruendling, M.
    Henkel, B.
    Hahnenkamp, K.
    Brinkrolf, P.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 2018, 67 (08): : 584 - 591
  • [30] Sepsis in the elderly: Are hospital emergency departments prepared?
    Martin-Sanchez, Francisco Javier
    Gonzalez del Castillo, Juan
    [J]. EMERGENCIAS, 2015, 27 (02): : 73 - 74