Defect width: the prognostic index for vaginal repair of cesarean section diverticula

被引:15
|
作者
Zhou, Xingchen [1 ]
Yao, Min [1 ]
Zhou, Jieru [1 ]
Tan, Weilin [1 ]
Wang, Husheng [1 ]
Wang, Xipeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Gynecol, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, 2699 Gaoke West Rd, Shanghai 200036, Peoples R China
关键词
Cesarean section diverticula; Vaginal repair; Defect width; Thickness of remaining muscular layer; SCAR DEFECT; TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; HYSTEROSCOPIC TREATMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR; CLINICAL IMPORTANCE; BLEEDING SECONDARY; INDUCED ISTHMOCELE; NONPREGNANT WOMEN; HYSTEROTOMY SCAR; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-016-4245-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
To evaluate the clinical parameter associated with cesarean section diverticula anatomic healing via vaginal repair management. Observational cohort study. From Jul 2014 to Dec 2015, 143 women with CSD underwent vaginal repair surgery in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, and 137(95.80%) were diagnosed using both transvaginal ultrasound and MRI. A total of 124 patients (86.71%) who were followed-up for more than 6 months after surgery were enrolled in this study. Excision and suture of CSD was performed through the vaginal approach. The defect sizes of the width, length, depth and TRM before or after repair were evaluated. The mean preoperative duration of menstruation was 14.47 +/- 3.30 days and the thickness of the remaining muscular layer was 2.65 +/- 1.13 mm before surgery. The study revealed that the healing effects of CSD repair stabilized 3 months after surgery. At the median follow-up time (11.28 months), CSD disappeared after surgery in 64.52% of patients (80/124), and 60.0% of patients (48/80) reached ae<currency>7 days of menstruation. Meanwhile, for 35.48% of patients (44/124), CSD persisted at the median follow-up after surgery, and 31.82% (14/44) of these patients reached ae<currency>7 days of menstruation(P < 0.05). TRM at a median follow-up time after vaginal repair > 7.88 mm, 92.11% (70/76) of CSD disappeared. Moreover, when preoperative CSD width ae<currency>18.85 mm indicates that only 18.75% (12/64) of patients will present with CSD after vaginal repair, as determined by MRI (95% CI 0.515-0.737). The defect width of the preoperative CSD was the prognostic index of CSD anatomical repair effect. When the preoperative CSD width > 18.85 mm, we should pay more attention to the edge of the defect during vaginal repairing.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 630
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] VAGINAL EXAMINATION BEFORE CESAREAN SECTION
    不详
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1950, 142 (04): : 298 - 298
  • [22] APGAR: CESAREAN SECTION AND VAGINAL DELIVERY
    Taavoni, S.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 : 589 - 589
  • [23] VAGINAL DELIVERY FOLLOWING CESAREAN SECTION
    DONNELLY, JP
    FRANZONI, KT
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1967, 29 (06): : 871 - &
  • [24] Vaginal birth after cesarean section
    Escamilla, JO
    Escamilla, GH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (06) : 1562 - 1563
  • [25] Vaginal delivery after Cesarean section
    Mennick, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2006, 106 (01) : 21 - 21
  • [26] VAGINAL PROSTAGLANDINS AND CESAREAN-SECTION
    ORFORD, HJL
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 60 (04): : 125 - 126
  • [27] VAGINAL DELIVERY FOLLOWING CESAREAN SECTION
    HARRIS, JR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1953, 66 (06) : 1191 - 1196
  • [28] Vaginal delivery after Cesarean section
    Mason, NR
    BOSTON MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL, 1917, 176 : 127 - 133
  • [29] Laparoscopic repair of cesarean section scar defect and the surgical outcome in 146 patients
    Zhang, Xuyin
    Wu, Chaoying
    Yang, Mengyi
    Xu, Heyang
    He, Yuan
    Ding, Jingxin
    Hua, Keqin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (03): : 4408 - 4416
  • [30] Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound
    Klemm, P
    Koehler, C
    Mangler, M
    Schneider, U
    Schneider, A
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (04) : 324 - 331