Changing Policy Framing as a Deliberate Strategy for Public Health Advocacy: A Qualitative Policy Case Study of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol

被引:68
|
作者
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal [1 ,2 ]
Bond, Lyndal [1 ,3 ]
Hilton, Shona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, MRC CSO Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Glasgow G12 8RZ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Ctr Excellence Intervent & Prevent Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
MILBANK QUARTERLY | 2014年 / 92卷 / 02期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
alcohol; policy; minimum unit pricing; public health; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; INDUSTRY; GOVERNMENT; LAW; INEQUALITIES; CONSUMPTION; PROPOSALS; COVERAGE; OPINION; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1111/1468-0009.12057
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context Scotland is the first country in the world to pass legislation introducing a minimum unit price (MUP) for alcohol in an attempt to reduce consumption and associated harms by increasing the price of the cheapest alcohol. We investigated the competing ways in which policy stakeholders presented the debate. We then established whether a change in framing helped explain the policy's emergence. Methods We conducted a detailed policy case study through analysis of evidence submitted to the Scottish parliament, and in-depth, one-to-one interviews (n = 36) with politicians, civil servants, advocates, researchers, and industry representatives. Findings Public- and voluntary-sector stakeholders tended to support MUP, while industry representatives were more divided. Two markedly different ways of presenting alcohol as a policy problem were evident. Critics of MUP (all of whom were related to industry) emphasized social disorder issues, particularly among young people, and hence argued for targeted approaches. In contrast, advocates for MUP (with the exception of those in industry) focused on alcohol as a health issue arising from overconsumption at a population level, thus suggesting that population-based interventions were necessary. Industry stakeholders favoring MUP adopted a hybrid framing, maintaining several aspects of the critical framing. Our interview data showed that public health advocates worked hard to redefine the policy issue by deliberately presenting a consistent alternative framing. Conclusions Framing alcohol policy as a broad, multisectoral, public health issue that requires a whole-population approach has been crucial to enabling policymakers to seriously consider MUP, and public health advocates intentionally presented alcohol policy in this way. This reframing helped prioritize public health considerations in the policy debate and represents a deliberate strategy for consideration by those advocating for policy change around the world and in other public health areas.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 283
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC TOWARDS A MINIMUM PRICE POLICY FOR ALCOHOL IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Keatley, David A.
    Hardcastle, Sarah J.
    Carragher, Natacha
    Chikritzhs, Tanya
    Daube, Mike
    Hagger, Martin S.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2015, 34 : 38 - 38
  • [22] A Qualitative Exploration of Indicators of Health Equity Embeddedness Among Public Health Policy Advocacy Campaigns
    Calloway, Eric E.
    Fricke, Hollyanne E.
    Carpenter, Leah R.
    Yaroch, Amy L.
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2022, 23 (03) : 453 - 462
  • [23] The price of a drink: the potential of alcohol minimum unit pricing as a public health measure in the UK
    Rice, Peter
    Drummond, Colin
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 201 (03) : 169 - 171
  • [24] Science and alcohol policy: a case study of the EU Strategy on Alcohol
    Gordon, Rebecca
    Anderson, Peter
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2011, 106 : 55 - 66
  • [25] Heavy Drinkers' Perspectives on Minimum Unit Pricing for Alcohol in Scotland: A Qualitative Interview Study
    O'May, Fiona
    Gill, Jan
    Black, Heather
    Rees, Cheryl
    Chick, Jonathan
    McPake, Barbara
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):
  • [26] Developing policy analytics for public health strategy and decisions—the Sheffield alcohol policy model framework
    Alan Brennan
    Petra Meier
    Robin Purshouse
    Rachid Rafia
    Yang Meng
    Daniel Hill-Macmanus
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2016, 236 : 149 - 176
  • [27] ADVOCACY STRATEGIES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY GAINS - UTILISING THE SMOKEFREE AUCKLAND CAMPAIGN AS A CASE STUDY
    Marck, Kristina
    Marcks, Kristina
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 : 135 - 135
  • [28] Death by Diet: The Role of Food Pricing Interventions as a Public Policy Response and Health Advocacy Opportunity
    Duhaney, Tara
    Campbell, Norm
    Niebylski, Mark L.
    Kaczorowski, Janusz
    Tsuyuki, Ross T.
    Willis, Kevin
    Mang, Eric
    Arango, Manuel
    Morris, Dorothy
    Ashley, Lisa
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 31 (02)
  • [29] Accessing evidence to inform public health policy: a study to enhance advocacy
    Tabak, R. G.
    Eyler, A. A.
    Dodson, E. A.
    Brownson, R. C.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 129 (06) : 698 - 704
  • [30] ALCOHOL AND PUBLIC HEALTH Under the influence: 1. False dawn for minimum unit pricing
    Gornall, Jonathan
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348