Changing Policy Framing as a Deliberate Strategy for Public Health Advocacy: A Qualitative Policy Case Study of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol

被引:68
|
作者
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal [1 ,2 ]
Bond, Lyndal [1 ,3 ]
Hilton, Shona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, MRC CSO Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Glasgow G12 8RZ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Ctr Excellence Intervent & Prevent Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
MILBANK QUARTERLY | 2014年 / 92卷 / 02期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
alcohol; policy; minimum unit pricing; public health; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; INDUSTRY; GOVERNMENT; LAW; INEQUALITIES; CONSUMPTION; PROPOSALS; COVERAGE; OPINION; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1111/1468-0009.12057
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context Scotland is the first country in the world to pass legislation introducing a minimum unit price (MUP) for alcohol in an attempt to reduce consumption and associated harms by increasing the price of the cheapest alcohol. We investigated the competing ways in which policy stakeholders presented the debate. We then established whether a change in framing helped explain the policy's emergence. Methods We conducted a detailed policy case study through analysis of evidence submitted to the Scottish parliament, and in-depth, one-to-one interviews (n = 36) with politicians, civil servants, advocates, researchers, and industry representatives. Findings Public- and voluntary-sector stakeholders tended to support MUP, while industry representatives were more divided. Two markedly different ways of presenting alcohol as a policy problem were evident. Critics of MUP (all of whom were related to industry) emphasized social disorder issues, particularly among young people, and hence argued for targeted approaches. In contrast, advocates for MUP (with the exception of those in industry) focused on alcohol as a health issue arising from overconsumption at a population level, thus suggesting that population-based interventions were necessary. Industry stakeholders favoring MUP adopted a hybrid framing, maintaining several aspects of the critical framing. Our interview data showed that public health advocates worked hard to redefine the policy issue by deliberately presenting a consistent alternative framing. Conclusions Framing alcohol policy as a broad, multisectoral, public health issue that requires a whole-population approach has been crucial to enabling policymakers to seriously consider MUP, and public health advocates intentionally presented alcohol policy in this way. This reframing helped prioritize public health considerations in the policy debate and represents a deliberate strategy for consideration by those advocating for policy change around the world and in other public health areas.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 283
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Representations of minimum unit pricing for alcohol in UK newspapers: a case study of a public health policy debate
    Patterson, Chris
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Wood, Karen
    Hilton, Shona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 37 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [2] THE DEVELOPMENT OF MINIMUM UNIT PRICING OF ALCOHOL IN SCOTLAND: A POLICY CASE STUDY
    Katikireddi, S. V.
    Hilton, S.
    Bond, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2012, 66 : A57 - A58
  • [3] Perspectives on econometric modelling to inform policy: a UK qualitative case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa V.
    Bond, Lyndal
    Hilton, Shona
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 24 (03): : 490 - 495
  • [4] Understanding the Development of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol in Scotland: A Qualitative Study of the Policy Process
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Hilton, Shona
    Bonell, Chris
    Bond, Lyndal
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [5] The divergence of minimum unit pricing policy across the UK: opportunities for public health policy development
    McKay, Ailsa J.
    Laverty, Anthony A.
    Majeed, Azeem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2017, 110 (09) : 358 - 364
  • [6] The Idea of Freedom in the Policy Debate on the Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol
    Dobson, Lynn
    Hawkins, Benjamin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, 2016, 47 (01) : 41 - 54
  • [7] Western Australian Public Opinions of a Minimum Pricing Policy for Alcohol: Study Protocol
    Keatley, David A.
    Carragher, Natacha
    Chikritzhs, Tanya
    Daube, Mike
    Hardcastle, Sarah J.
    Hagger, Martin S.
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2015, 4 (04):
  • [8] Policy congruence and advocacy strategies in the discourse networks of minimum unit pricing for alcohol and the soft drinks industry levy
    Hilton, Shona
    Buckton, Christina H.
    Henrichsen, Tim
    Fergie, Gillian
    Leifeld, Philip
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2020, 115 (12) : 2303 - 2314
  • [10] Implications for alcohol minimum unit pricing advocacy: What can we learn for public health from UK newsprint coverage of key claim-makers in the policy debate?
    Hilton, Shona
    Wood, Karen
    Patterson, Chris
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2014, 102 : 157 - 164