Long-term dosing patterns of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus after renal transplantation

被引:10
|
作者
Langone, Anthony [1 ]
Shihab, Fuad [2 ]
Pankewycz, Oleh [3 ]
Doria, Cataldo [4 ]
Wiland, Anne [5 ]
McCague, Kevin [5 ]
Chan, Laurence [6 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Erie Cty Med Ctr & Labs, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
adverse events; Cellcept; efficacy; enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium; kidney transplantation; MORE; mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolic acid; Myfortic; GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATIONS; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; DOSE REDUCTION; RECIPIENTS; CONVERSION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; IMPACT; ASSOCIATION; INTOLERANCE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.12392
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
MORE was a four-yr, prospective, observational study at 40 transplant centers in the US. Data were analyzed to evaluate changes in mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing over time in 904 de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, n=616) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=288) with tacrolimus. Induction therapy and steroid treatment were similar in the two subpopulations. The proportion of patients receiving the maximal recommended MPA dose was 80.5%, 43.9%, 39.2%, 34.6%, and 30.1% at baseline and years 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. More patients received the maximal recommended MPA dose with EC-MPS vs. MMF at month 1 (79.2% vs. 71.7%, p=0.016), month 3 (68.5% vs. 56.9%, p=0.001), and month 6 (52.9% vs. 44.0%, p=0.028). Multivariate analysis showed the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or death to be similar for EC-MPS vs. MMF. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was similar with EC-MPS vs. MMF at all time points. There were no significant differences in any category of adverse event between the EC-MPS and MMF cohorts during follow-up, including gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, MPA dose was maintained more effectively in the first sixmonths after kidney transplantation using EC-MPS vs. MMF, without an increase in adverse events.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:961 / 967
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus:: Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic outcomes
    Budde, Klemens
    Glander, Petra
    Kraemer, Bernhard K.
    Fischer, Wolfgang
    Hoffmann, Ute
    Bauer, Steffen
    Grohmann, Jana
    Neumayer, Hans-Hellmut
    Arns, Wolfgang
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (04) : 417 - 424
  • [32] Mycophenolic acid metabolite profile in renal transplant patients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil
    Tedesco-Silva, H
    Bastien, MC
    Choi, L
    Felipe, C
    Campestrini, J
    Picard, F
    Schmouder, R
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) : 852 - 855
  • [33] Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant recipients with gastrointestinal tract disorders
    Darji, P.
    Vijayaraghavan, R.
    Thiagarajan, C. M.
    Sharma, R. K.
    Subbarao, B.
    Pishardy, R.
    Dakshinamurthy, K. V.
    Vijaykumar, R.
    Abraham, G.
    Bhaskar, S.
    Agarwal, L.
    Shah, B.
    Abraham, A.
    John, M.
    Sampathkumar, K.
    Das, T.
    Umesh, L.
    Sundar, S.
    Ballal, H.
    Jasuja, S.
    Saxena, S.
    Saha, T. K.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (07) : 2262 - 2267
  • [34] Quality of life in renal transplant recipients following conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
    Cofan, F.
    Rosich, E.
    Arias, M.
    Torregrosa, V.
    Oppenheimer, F.
    Campistol, J. M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (07) : 2179 - 2181
  • [35] ENTERIC-COATED SODIUM MYCOPHENOLATE IN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS
    Rengel, Manuel
    Tana, Lorena
    Reque, Javier
    Quiroga-Gilis, Borja
    Panizo, Nayara
    Bucalo, Laura
    Abad, Soraya
    Vega, Almudena
    Verdalles, Ursula
    Verde, Eduardo
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 : 111 - 111
  • [36] Trough-level guided dosing is reliable for mycophenolate mofetil but not for enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium
    Von Moos, Seraina
    Rho, Elena
    Lopez, Kai Castrezana
    Weidmann, Lukas
    George, Britta
    Pfister, Susan
    Schachtner, Thomas
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 39 : I1632 - I1633
  • [37] Sites of gastrointestinal lesion induced by mycophenolate mofetil: a comparison with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in rats
    Jia, Yichen
    Wang, Rulin
    Li, Long
    Zhang, Ying
    Li, Jiawei
    Wang, Jina
    Wang, Xuanchuan
    Qi, Guisheng
    Rong, Ruiming
    Xu, Ming
    Zhu, Tongyu
    BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 19
  • [38] Long-term safety and tolerability after conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic) in stable maintenance renal transplant recipients
    Chapman, J
    IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2006, 84 (03): : A7 - A7
  • [39] Bioavailability of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Is Differentially Affected by Pantoprazole in Healthy Volunteers
    Rupprecht, Korbinian
    Schmidt, Christoph
    Raspe, Anne
    Schweda, Frank
    Shipkova, Maria
    Fischer, Wolfgang
    Bucher, Michael
    Kees, Frieder
    Faerber, Lothar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 49 (10): : 1196 - 1201
  • [40] Is Conversion from Mycophenolate Mofetil to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Justifiable for Gastrointestinal Quality of Life?
    Kyle M. Gardiner
    Susan E. Tett
    Christine E. Staatz
    Drugs in R&D, 2018, 18 : 271 - 282