Receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) performances of combined GPS/BeiDou/QZSS in urban canyon

被引:8
|
作者
Su, Xian-Li [1 ,2 ]
Zhan, Xingqun [1 ]
Niu, Mancang [1 ]
Zhang, Yanhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Aeronaut & Astronaut, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Engn Phys, Staff Inst Technol, Mianyang 621900, Sichuan Provinc, Peoples R China
关键词
BeiDou; failure detection and exclusion (FDE); GPS; urban canyon; QZSS; receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM);
D O I
10.1002/tee.21967
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Multi-GNSS (global navigation satellite system) has become a trend to solve the urban canyon effect in order to meet the requirements of GNSS users, but the probability of mistaken satellites is also increasing with the increase in the number of visible satellites. The receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) performance has therefore become very important. In this paper, the minimum RAIM availability (MRA) is proposed to evaluate the RAIM availability of combined GNSS constellations, and the minimal detectable effect (MDE) is applied to assess the RAIM fault detection capability. The significant improvements of RAIM performances in urban canyons when GPS/QZSS (quasi-zenith satellite system) are combined without and with BeiDou are quantified and analyzed by the simulations of the Asia-Pacific region snapshot and temporal variations in Beijing, Tokyo, Shanghai, and Hong Kong with different masking angles. The combining of BeiDou with GPS/QZSS has great realistic significance, especially in the Asia-Pacific region. The evaluation measure of RAIM performances can be used to predict the availability of GNSS constellations under different conditions, and it can be also used to assess the availability and integrity of combined constellations. (c) 2014 Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 281
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring for GPS Attitude Determination with Carrier Phase FD/FDE algorithms
    Su, Xian-Li
    Zhan, Xingqun
    Fang, Hui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS 2010), 2010, : 2168 - 2181
  • [33] Research on GPS Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Algorithm In the Occurrence of Two-satellite Faults
    Wang, Er Shen
    Yue, Xiao Dong
    Pang, Tao
    Zhang, Zhi Xian
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC, INFORMATION AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, 2016, 44
  • [34] Review and prospect of GNSS receiver autonomous integrity monitoring
    Xu, Xiaohao
    Yang, Chuansen
    Liu, Ruihua
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34 (03): : 451 - 463
  • [35] A measurement domain receiver autonomous integrity monitoring algorithm
    Shaojun Feng
    Washington Y. Ochieng
    David Walsh
    Rigas Ioannides
    GPS Solutions, 2006, 10 : 85 - 96
  • [36] A measurement domain receiver autonomous integrity monitoring algorithm
    Feng, Shaojun
    Ochieng, Washington Y.
    Walsh, David
    Ioannides, Rigas
    GPS SOLUTIONS, 2006, 10 (02) : 85 - 96
  • [37] An Overview of Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM)
    Walter, Todd
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ION 2019 PACIFIC PNT MEETING, 2019, : 896 - 914
  • [38] GNSS receiver autonomous integrity monitoring with a dynamic model
    Hewitson, Steve
    Wang, Jinling
    JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2007, 60 (02): : 247 - 263
  • [39] Development of a Multi-Antenna GPS/Beidou Receiver for Troposphere/Ionosphere Monitoring
    Juang, J-C.
    Tsai, C-T.
    Chen, Y-H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS 2012), 2012, : 947 - 952
  • [40] Parametric Performance Study of Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM) for Combined GNSS Constellations
    Rippl, Markus
    Spletter, Alexandru
    Guenther, Christoph
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION, 2011, : 285 - 295