Weightbearing CT in normal hindfoot alignment - Presence of a constitutional valgus?

被引:32
|
作者
Burssens, A. [1 ]
Van Herzele, E. [1 ]
Leenders, T. [2 ]
Clockaerts, S. [3 ]
Buedts, K. [4 ]
Vandeputte, G. [5 ]
Victor, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] AZ Monica, Florent Pauwelslei 21, B-2100 Deurne, Belgium
[3] AZ Groeninge, Burgemeester Vercruysselaan 5, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[4] ZNA Middelheim, Lindendreef 1, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[5] H Hartziekenhuis, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Mechelstr 24, B-2500 Lier, Belgium
关键词
Hindfoot alignment; Weightbear CT; Hindfoot correction; Normal alignment; WEIGHT-BEARING CT; STANDING POSITION; BONE POSITION; ANKLE; FOOT; RELIABILITY; PEDOGRAPHY; OSTEOTOMY; ANGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The normal hindfoot angle is estimated between 2 degrees and 6 degrees of valgus in the general population. These results are solely based on clinical findings and plain radiographs. The purpose of this study is to assess the hindfoot alignment using weightbear CT. Methods: Forty-eight patients, mean age of 39.6 +/- 13.2 years, with clinical and radiological absence of hindfoot pathology were included. A weightbear CT was obtained and allowed to measure the anatomical tibia axis (TAx) and the hindfoot alignment (HA). The HA was firstly determined using the inferior point of the calcaneus (HA(IC)). A density measurement of this area was subsequently performed to analyze if this point concurred with an increased ossification, indicating a higher load exposure. Secondly the HA was determined by dividing the calcaneus in the long axial view (HALA) and compared to the (HA(IC)) to point out any possible differences attributed to the measurement method. Reliability was assessed using an intra class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The mean HA(IC) equaled 0.79 +/- of valgus +/- 3.2 (ICCHA IC = 0.73) with a mean TAx of 2.7 degrees varus +/- 2.1 (ICCTA = 0.76). The HALA equaled 9.1 degrees of valgus +/- 4.8 (ICCHA LA = 0.71) and differed significantly by a P < 0.001 from the HA(IC), which showed a more neutral alignment. Correlation between both was shown to be good by a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.74. The mean density of the inferior calcaneal area equaled 271.3 +/- 84.1 and was significantly higher than the regional calcaneal area (P < 0.001). Conclusions: These results show a more neutral alignment of the hindfoot in this group of non-symptomatic feet as opposed to the generally accepted constitutional valgus. This could have repercussion on hindfoot position during fusion or in quantifying the correction of a malalignment. The inferior calcaneus point in this can be used during pre-operative planning of a hindfoot correction as an anatomical landmark due to its shown influence on load transfer. (C) 2017 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 218
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Does valgus high tibial osteotomy influence ankle and hindfoot alignment?
    Delaloye, Jean-Romain
    Rwakabayiza, Sylvia
    Crevoisier, Xavier
    Martin, Robin
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147 : 32S - 32S
  • [12] Medial Distal Tibial Angle: Comparison Between Weightbearing Mortise View and Hindfoot Alignment View
    Barg, Alexej
    Harris, Michael D.
    Henninger, Heath B.
    Amendola, Richard L.
    Saltzman, Charles L.
    Hintermann, Beat
    Anderson, Andrew E.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 33 (08) : 655 - 661
  • [13] Hindfoot Alignment Valgus Moment Arm Increases in Adult Flatfoot With Achilles Tendon Contracture
    Arangio, George
    Rogman, Alberic
    Reed, James F., III
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (11) : 1078 - 1082
  • [14] Comparison between Weightbearing-CT semiautomatic and manual measurements in Hallux Valgus
    de Carvalho, Kepler Alencar Mendes
    Walt, Jennifer Sander
    Ehret, Amanda
    Tazegul, Tutku Erim
    Dibbern, Kevin
    Mansur, Nacime Salomao Barbachan
    Lalevee, Matthieu
    Netto, Cesar de Cesar
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (04) : 518 - 525
  • [15] VARIATIONS IN FOREFOOT HINDFOOT ALIGNMENT - A NORMAL VARIANT OR PATHOLOGICAL ENTITY
    ANDERSON, EG
    BLACK, JA
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1988, 70 (03) : 176 - 176
  • [16] Impact of dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy on hindfoot alignment and biomechanics of patients with insertional achilles tendinopathy; A weightbearing CT-based simulation study
    Karaismailoglu, Bedri
    Peiffer, Matthias
    Sharma, Siddhartha
    Burssens, Arne
    Guss, Daniel
    Miller, Christopher P.
    Bejarano-Pineda, Lorena
    Digiovanni, Christopher W.
    Ashkani-Esfahani, Soheil
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2025, 31 (03) : 264 - 272
  • [17] CT analysis of hindfoot alignment in chronic lateral ankle instability
    Van Bergeyk, AB
    Younger, A
    Carson, B
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 23 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [18] Weightbearing CT Scan Assessment of Foot Alignment in Patients With Hallux Rigidus
    Cheung, Zoe B.
    Myerson, Mark S.
    Tracey, Joseph
    Vulcano, Ettore
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 39 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [19] Hindfoot Alignment in Flexible Cavovarus Deformity Under Orthostatic and Coleman Block Test Positions: A Weightbearing Computed Tomography Study
    Pires, Eduardo Araujo
    Lobo, Carlos Felipe Teixeira
    Fonseca, Fabio Correa
    Sposeto, Rafael Barban
    Mansur, Nacime Salomao Barbachan
    Easley, Mark E.
    de Cesar Netto, Cesar
    Godoy-Santos, Alexandre Leme
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 45 (09) : 1027 - 1037
  • [20] Range of Normal and Abnormal Syndesmotic Measurements Using Weightbearing CT
    Hagemeijer, Noortje Catharina
    Chang, Song Ho
    Abdelaziz, Mohamed Elghazy
    Casey, Jack Christopher
    Waryasz, Gregory Richard
    Guss, Daniel
    DiGiovanni, Christopher William
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 40 (12) : 1430 - 1437