Risk factors for suboptimal laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patients

被引:5
|
作者
Planellas, Pere [1 ,2 ]
Salvador, Helena [1 ]
Cornejo, Lidia [2 ]
Buxo, Maria [2 ]
Farres, Ramon [1 ,2 ]
Molina, Xavier [3 ]
Maroto, Albert [3 ]
Ortega, Nuria [1 ,2 ]
Ignacio Rodriguez-Hermosa, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Codina-Cazador, Antoni [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Girona, Univ Hosp Girona, Dept Gen & Digest Surg, Colorectal Surg Sect, France Ave S-N, Girona 17007, Spain
[2] Girona Biomed Res Fdn, Girona, Spain
[3] Univ Hosp Girona, Inst Diagnost Imatge, Dept Radiol, Girona, Spain
关键词
Colorectal surgery; Laparoscopy; Predictive model; Rectal cancer; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; MULTIVARIABLE PREDICTION MODEL; INDIVIDUAL PROGNOSIS; COLORECTAL RESECTION; DIAGNOSIS TRIPOD; OPEN COLECTOMY; CLASICC TRIAL; COLON-CANCER; CONVERSION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-02029-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is technically complex. This study aimed to identify risk factors for suboptimal laparoscopic surgery (involved margins, incomplete mesorectal excision, and/or conversion to open surgery) in patients with rectal cancer. Methods We included patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer between June 2009 and June 2018. We defined the outcome variable suboptimal laparoscopic surgery as conversion to open surgery or inadequate histopathological specimens (margins < 1 mm or involved and/or poor-quality mesorectal excision). To identify independent predictors of suboptimal laparoscopic surgery, we analyzed 15 prospectively recorded demographic, clinical, and anthropometric variables obtained from our rectal cancer unit's database. Subanalyses examined the same variables with respect to conversion and to inadequate histopathological specimens. Results Of the 323 patients included, 91 (28.2%) had suboptimal laparoscopic surgery. In the multivariate analysis, the independent factors associated with all suboptimal laparoscopic surgery were tumor location <= 5 cm from the anal verge (OR = 2.95, 0.95% CI 1.32-6.60; p = 0.008) and the intertuberous distance (OR = 0.79, 0.95% CI 0.65-0.96; p = 0.019). In the subanalyses, the promontorium-retropubic axis was an independent predictor of conversion (OR 0.70, 0.95% CI 0.51-0.96; p = 0.026), and tumor location <= 5 cm from the anal verge (OR 3.71, 0.95% 1.51-9.15; p = 0.004) was an independent predictor of inadequate histopathological specimens. Conclusions Predictive factors for suboptimal laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer were tumor location and the intertuberous distance. These results could help surgeons decide whether to use other surgical approaches in complex cases.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 318
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer Reply
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Nam, Byung Ho
    Park, Ji Won
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (10): : 920 - 921
  • [32] Conversions in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Martijn H. G. M. van der Pas
    Charlotte L. Deijen
    Gabor S. A. Abis
    Elly S. M. de Lange-de Klerk
    Eva Haglind
    Alois Fürst
    Antonio M. Lacy
    Miguel A. Cuesta
    Hendrik J. Bonjer
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 2263 - 2270
  • [33] Laparoscopic rectal surgery for middle and lower rectal cancer
    Yosuke Fukunaga
    Masayuki Higashino
    Shinnya Tanimura
    Masashi Takemura
    Yushi Fujiwara
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 145 - 151
  • [34] Laparoscopic rectal surgery for middle and lower rectal cancer
    Fukunaga, Yosuke
    Higashino, Masayuki
    Tanimura, Shinnya
    Takemura, Masashi
    Fujiwara, Yushi
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (01): : 145 - 151
  • [35] Rectal Cancer Surgery: robotic or laparoscopic?
    Reibetanz, J.
    Germer, C. T.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2019, 90 : S42 - S42
  • [36] Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients
    Ahmed, J.
    Cao, H.
    Panteleimonitis, S.
    Khan, J.
    Parvaiz, A.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 19 (12) : 1092 - 1099
  • [37] Risk Factors for Urinary Dysfunction after Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Kauff, Daniel W.
    Lang, Hauke
    Kneist, Werner
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (03) : S19 - S19
  • [38] The Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Hosseini, Seyed Vahid
    Alghataa, Ahmad Kashif
    Bananzadeh, Alimohammad
    Bahrami, Faranak
    Khazraei, Hajar
    Tadayon, Seyed Mohammad Kazem
    Haghazali, Mehrdad
    Hajihoseini, Fahimeh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (06)
  • [39] Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Excision The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group
    Park, Jun Seok
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Kim, Seon Hahn
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Lee, Kang Young
    Kang, Sung Bum
    Kim, Ji Yeon
    Lee, Kil Yeon
    Kim, Byung Chun
    Bae, Byung Noe
    Son, Gyung Mo
    Lee, Sun Il.
    Kang, Hyun
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (04) : 665 - 671
  • [40] Useful Preoperative Simulation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Patients with Kyphosis
    Takeda, Kohki
    Matsuda, Akihisa
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Shinji, Seiichi
    Ohta, Ryo
    Sonoda, Hiromichi
    Iwai, Takuma
    Ueda, Koji
    Kuriyama, Sho
    Miyasaka, Toshimitsu
    Yoshida, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2022, 89 (06) : 634 - 639