Modeling the effect of computer-aided detection on the sensitivity of screening mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Nishikawa, Robert M.
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Committee Med Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We have developed a Monte Carlo model to examine the cancer detection rate in screening mammography. We simulated the situation where screening was implemented for 9 years and then CADe was implemented for an additional 9 years. We investigated the effectiveness of two different methods for measuring changes in cancer detection rate. The first method was a sequential method in which the radiologist first reads without CADe and then immediately reads with CADe. The second method is temporal comparison where the cancer detection rates for two periods of time are compared: one without the use of CADe and one when CADe is in use. The model predictions have important implications for clinical studies of CADe. The temporal method is unlikely to measure a real affect, because the effect is small. A sequential method can measure an increase in the number of cancers detected because of CADe, but it cannot measure an overall increase in the cancer detection rate of the screening program.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 53
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How not to assess computer-aided detection for mammography
    Guenin, MA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (06) : 1599 - 1599
  • [42] Evaluation of the potential of computer-aided detection (CAD) to mitigate detection errors in screening mammography
    Birdwell, RL
    Ikeda, DM
    O'Shaughnessy, KF
    Sickles, EA
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 150 - 151
  • [43] Early detection of breast cancer: Overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening
    Houssami, N.
    Given-Wilson, R.
    Ciatto, S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (02) : 171 - 176
  • [44] Development of A New Case Based Computer-Aided Detection Scheme for Screening Mammography
    Tan, Maxine
    Zheng, Bin
    2016 IEEE EMBS CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES (IECBES), 2016, : 24 - 29
  • [45] Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography
    Georgian-Smith, Dianne
    Moore, Richard H.
    Halpern, Elkan
    Yeh, Eren D.
    Rafferty, Elizabeth A.
    D'Alessandro, Helen Anne
    Staffa, Mary
    Hall, Deborah A.
    McCarthy, Kathleen A.
    Kopans, Daniel B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (05) : 1135 - 1141
  • [46] Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography
    Nishikawa, RM
    Kallergi, M
    Orton, CG
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (04) : 811 - 814
  • [47] Interpretation time for screening mammography as a function of the number of computer-aided detection marks
    Schwartz, Tayler M.
    Hillis, Stephen L.
    Sridharan, Radhika
    Lukyanchenko, Olga
    Geiser, William
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Wei, Wei
    Haygood, Tamara Miner
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 7 (02)
  • [48] Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation
    Alberdi, E
    Povyakalo, AA
    Strigini, L
    Ayton, P
    Hartswood, M
    Procter, R
    Slack, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 : S31 - S40
  • [49] Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography: Work in progress
    Nicholas, MJ
    Slanetz, PJ
    Mendel, JB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 32 - 33
  • [50] DeepCAT: Deep Computer-Aided Triage of Screening Mammography
    Paul H. Yi
    Dhananjay Singh
    Susan C. Harvey
    Gregory D. Hager
    Lisa A. Mullen
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2021, 34 : 27 - 35