Comparison of Iterative Model Reconstruction versus Filtered Back-Projection in Pediatric Emergency Head CT: Dose, Image Quality, and Image-Reconstruction Times

被引:22
|
作者
Southard, R. N. [1 ]
Bardo, D. M. E. [1 ]
Temkit, M. H. [2 ]
Thorkelson, M. A. [1 ]
Augustyn, R. A. [1 ]
Martinot, C. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Phoenix Childrens Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Phoenix Childrens Hosp, Dept Clin Res, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; REDUCTION; PROTOCOLS; HYBRID;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A6034
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Noncontrast CT of the head is the initial imaging test for traumatic brain injury, stroke, or suspected nonaccidental trauma. Low-dose head CT protocols using filtered back-projection are susceptible to increased noise and decreased image quality. Iterative reconstruction noise suppression allows the use of lower-dose techniques with maintained image quality. We review our experience with children undergoing emergency head CT examinations reconstructed using knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction versus standard filtered back-projection, comparing reconstruction times, radiation dose, and objective and subjective image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study comparing 173 children scanned using standard age-based noncontrast head CT protocols reconstructed with filtered back-projection with 190 children scanned using low-dose protocols reconstructed with iterative model reconstruction. ROIs placed on the frontal white matter and thalamus yielded signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios. Volume CT dose index and study reconstruction times were recorded. Random subgroups of patients were selected for subjective image-quality review. RESULTS: The volume CT dose index was significantly reduced in studies reconstructed with iterative model reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection, (mean, 24.4 3.1 mGy versus 31.1 +/- 6.0 mGy, P < .001), while the SNR and contrast-to-noise ratios improved 2-fold (P < .001). Radiologists graded iterative model reconstruction images as superior to filtered back-projection images for gray-white matter differentiation and anatomic detail (P < .001). The average reconstruction time of the filtered back-projection studies was 101 seconds, and with iterative model reconstruction, it was 147 seconds (P < .001), without a practical effect on work flow. CONCLUSIONS: In children referred for emergency noncontrast head CT, optimized low-dose protocols with iterative model reconstruction allowed us to significantly reduce the relative dose, on average, 22% compared with filtered back-projection, with significantly improved objective and subjective image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 871
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection
    Antonio Moscariello
    Richard A. P. Takx
    U. Joseph Schoepf
    Matthias Renker
    Peter L. Zwerner
    Terrence X. O’Brien
    Thomas Allmendinger
    Sebastian Vogt
    Bernhard Schmidt
    Giancarlo Savino
    Christian Fink
    Lorenzo Bonomo
    Thomas Henzler
    [J]. European Radiology, 2011, 21
  • [42] Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?
    Pan, Xiaochuan
    Sidky, Emil Y.
    Vannier, Michael
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2009, 25 (12)
  • [43] Morphology Based Iterative Back-Projection for Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Image
    Nayak, Rajashree
    Harshavardhan, Saka
    Patra, Dipti
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS ON 2014 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGY TRENDS IN ELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING (ET2ECN), 2014,
  • [44] Image quality of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection
    Roh-Eul Yoo
    Eun-Ah Park
    Whal Lee
    Hackjoon Shim
    Yeo Koon Kim
    Jin Wook Chung
    Jae Hyung Park
    [J]. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013, 29 : 669 - 676
  • [45] Image quality of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection
    Yoo, Roh-Eul
    Park, Eun-Ah
    Lee, Whal
    Shim, Hackjoon
    Kim, Yeo Koon
    Chung, Jin Wook
    Park, Jae Hyung
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 29 (03): : 669 - 676
  • [46] CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques
    Xiao-Zhu Lin
    Haruhiko Machida
    Isao Tanaka RT
    Rika Fukui RT
    Eiko Ueno
    Ke-Min Chen
    Fu-Hua Yan
    [J]. Abdominal Imaging, 2014, 39 : 497 - 505
  • [47] CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques
    Lin, Xiao-Zhu
    Machida, Haruhiko
    Tanaka, Isao
    Fukui, Rika
    Ueno, Eiko
    Chen, Ke-Min
    Yan, Fu-Hua
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2014, 39 (03): : 497 - 505
  • [48] Evaluation of Heavily Calcified Vessels with Coronary CT Angiography: Comparison of Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Image Reconstruction Techniques
    Renker, Matthias
    Schoepf, U. J.
    Weininger, Markus
    Kerl, J. M.
    Bauer, Ralf W.
    Henzler, Thomas
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [49] Reducing Radiation Dose at Chest CT: Comparison Among Model-based Type Iterative Reconstruction, Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection
    de Margerie-Mellon, Constance
    de Bazelaire, Cedric
    Montlahuc, Claire
    Lambert, Jerome
    Martineau, Antoine
    Coulon, Philippe
    de Kerviler, Eric
    Beigeman, Catherine
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) : 1246 - 1254
  • [50] Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection
    Moscariello, Antonio
    Takx, Richard A. P.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Renker, Matthias
    Zwerner, Peter L.
    O'Brien, Terrence X.
    Allmendinger, Thomas
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Savino, Giancarlo
    Fink, Christian
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    Henzler, Thomas
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (10) : 2130 - 2138