Cost-effectiveness of janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies

被引:3
|
作者
Kumar, S. Sajith [1 ]
Haridoss, Madhumitha [1 ]
Venkataraman, Krishnamurthy [2 ]
Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara [1 ]
机构
[1] ICMR Natl Inst Epidemiol, Hlth Technol Assessment Resource Ctr, Chennai, India
[2] Chennai Meenakshi Multispecialty Hosp, Chennai, India
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; janus kinase inhibitors; cost-effectiveness; QALY; evidence syntheses; ADALIMUMAB; TOFACITINIB; MODERATE; PLACEBO; BARICITINIB; MONOTHERAPY; SARILUMAB; STRATEGY; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2022.1090361
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-i), a class of targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tDMARDs), are suggested as second or third-line therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Synthesized cost-effective evidence would aid in informed decision-making given the similar clinical effectiveness of JAKi, but incongruent cost-effectiveness reports.Methods: Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Tufts Medical Centers' cost-effective analysis registry. We pooled the incremental net benefit (INB) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects model and the heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane-Q test and I2 statistic. Modified economic evaluation bias checklist was used to assess the quality of selected studies. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's test. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment was performed to assess the certainty of outcomes presented.Results: We included seventeen relevant studies for systematic review, of which fifteen were eligible for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that JAK-i is cost-effective compared to csDMARDS/bDMARDs with a pooled INB (INBp) of $19,886 (95% CI, 1,635 to 38,137) but with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 99.14). As a second-line treatment for csDMARD failed RA, JAK-i is cost-effective than csDMARD/bDMARD with a pooled INB of $23,144 (74.1-46,214) and high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.67). But on a separate analysis JAK-i as second-line treatment is not cost-effective than TNF-a-i (INBp = $25,813, -5,714 to 57,340). However, leave-one-out analysis found that omitting a single outlier makes JAK-i cost-effective. Further, JAK-i is not cost-effective as a third-line treatment for csDMARD-TNF-a-I failed RA, compared to csDMARDs/bDMARDs with INBp $26,157 (-7,284 to 59,598).Conclusion: Meta-analysis suggests that JAK-i is cost-effective when used after csDMARD failure but not cost-effective when used after csDMARD-TNF-a-i failure with low certainty of evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Review on Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility of Psychosocial Care in Cancer Patients
    Jansen, Femke
    van Zwieten, Valesca
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    Leemans, C. Rene
    Leeuw, Irma M. Verdonck-de
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 3 (02) : 125 - 136
  • [32] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Molina-Garcia, Pablo
    Mora-Traverso, Marta
    Prieto-Moreno, Rafael
    Diaz-Vasquez, Andrea
    Antony, Benny
    Ariza-Vega, Patrocinio
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2024, 67 (01)
  • [33] Cost-utility analysis of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis in Italy
    de Portu, Simona
    Mantovani, Lorenzo Giovanni
    Olivieri, Ignazio
    [J]. FARMECONOMIA-HEALTH ECONOMICS AND THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS, 2008, 9 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [34] Cost-utility analysis studies of depression management: A systematic review
    Pirraglia, PA
    Rosen, AB
    Hermann, RC
    Olchanski, NV
    Neumann, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (12): : 2155 - 2162
  • [35] Analysis of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for immunosuppressive protocols in renal transplantation
    Keown, P
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (1-2) : 1140 - 1141
  • [36] Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis
    Grosso, A. M.
    Bodalia, P. N.
    MacAllister, R. J.
    Hingorani, A. D.
    Moon, J. C.
    Scott, M. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 65 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit studies in rheumatology: a review of the literature, 2001-2002
    Tella, MN
    Feinglass, J
    Chang, RW
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 15 (02) : 127 - 131
  • [38] Posttransplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance A Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility Analysis
    Hessheimer, Amelia J.
    Vargas-Martinez, Ana Magdalena
    Trapero-Bertran, Marta
    Navasa, Miquel
    Fondevila, Constantino
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (02) : E359 - E365
  • [39] A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of biological DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis
    Richard, L.
    Brown, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A245 - A246
  • [40] A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study of lung transplantation
    Vasiliadis, HM
    Collet, JP
    Penrod, JR
    Ferraro, P
    Poirier, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 24 (09): : 1275 - 1283