Comparison of four sampling methods for microbiological quantification on broiler carcasses

被引:3
|
作者
Gravning, Gunvor Elise Nagel [1 ]
Rotterud, Ole-Johan [1 ]
Bjorkoy, Solfrid [2 ]
Forseth, Merete [2 ]
Skjerve, Eystein [3 ]
Llarena, Ann-Katrin [3 ]
Lian, Astrid [4 ]
Johannessen, Gro S. [5 ]
Hauge, Sigrun J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Animalia Norwegian Meat & Poultry Res Ctr, 396 Okern, N-0513 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norsk Kylling, Bygget 6, N-7290 Storen, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Paraclin Sci, POB 369 Sentrum, N-0102 Oslo, Norway
[4] Trondheim Kommune Bydrift Analysesenteret, Landbruksvegen 5, N-7047 Trondheim, Norway
[5] Norwegian Vet Inst, POB 750 Sentrum, N-0106 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Broiler carcass; Sampling method; E; coli; Enterobacteriaceae; POULTRY CARCASSES; PLATE METHOD; EXCISION; ENUMERATION; SALMONELLA; RECOVERY; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107589
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate four different sampling methods for quantification of bacterial contamination of broiler carcasses at slaughter. Various sampling techniques are used worldwide for sampling carcass surfaces and the results are often presented with different units of measurement, such as cfu (or log cfu) per mL, per cm(2), per carcass, or per gram. Sampling was performed in a commercial abattoir with naturally contaminated carcasses (n = 100). Sampling methods compared were: whole-carcass rinse (WCR) in 200 mL liquid, 10 g of neck skin and breast skin, and gauze cloth swabs (3 sites x 100 cm(2)). Petrifilms were used for analyses of the samples for total plate count, Enterobacteriaceae, and E. coli. The results were converted into log cfu per cm(2).The recoveries of Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli were highest from samples collected by WCR, followed by neck-skin excision (recovered 80-100% of WCR), then breast-skin excision (recovered 50-65% of WCR), and finally swabbing (recovered 40-50% of WCR). In conclusion, the WCR sampling method provides the best reflection of the extent of carcass contamination.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF EXCISION, SWABBING AND RINSING SAMPLING METHODS TO DETERMINE THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF BROILER CARCASSES
    Zhang, Qiu Qin
    Ye, Ke Ping
    Xu, Xing Lian
    Zhou, Guang Hong
    Cao, Jin Xuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY, 2012, 32 (01) : 134 - 139
  • [2] AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGICAL SAMPLING OF BROILER CARCASSES
    DICKENS, JA
    COX, NA
    BAILEY, JS
    THOMSON, JE
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1985, 64 (06) : 1116 - 1120
  • [3] Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses
    Pepperell, R
    Reid, CA
    Solano, SN
    Hutchison, ML
    Walters, LD
    Johnston, AM
    Buncic, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2005, 68 (10) : 2163 - 2168
  • [4] Evaluation of Three Sampling Methods for the Microbiological Analysis of Broiler Carcasses after Immersion Chilling
    Giombelli, Audecir
    Cavani, Ricardo
    Abreu Gloria, Maria Beatriz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2013, 76 (08) : 1330 - 1335
  • [5] COMPARISON OF RINSE SAMPLING METHODS FOR DETECTION OF SALMONELLAE ON EVISCERATED BROILER CARCASSES
    COX, NA
    BLANKENSHIP, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1975, 40 (06) : 1333 - 1334
  • [6] SAMPLING FOR PRECISE MICROBIOLOGICAL PLATE COUNTS ON BROILER CHICKEN CARCASSES
    KLINGER, I
    BASKER, D
    JUVEN, BJ
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1981, 60 (03) : 575 - 578
  • [7] Comparison of four sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler fitter
    Buhr, R. J.
    Richardson, L. J.
    Cason, J. A.
    Cox, N. A.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2006, 85 : 209 - 209
  • [8] Comparison of four sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler litter
    Buhr, R. J.
    Richardson, L. J.
    Cason, J. A.
    Cox, N. A.
    Fairchild, B. D.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [9] Comparison of Neck Skin Excision and Whole Carcass Rinse Sampling Methods for Microbiological Evaluation of Broiler Carcasses before and after Immersion Chilling
    Cox, N. A.
    Richardson, L. J.
    Cason, J. A.
    Buhr, R. J.
    Vizzier-Thaxton, Y.
    Smith, D. P.
    Fedorka-Cray, P. J.
    Romanenghi, C. P.
    Pereira, L. V. B.
    Doyle, M. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2010, 73 (05) : 976 - 980
  • [10] COMPARISON OF SAMPLING METHODS FOR ESCHERICHIA-COLI AND TOTAL AEROBIC COUNTS ON BROILER CARCASSES
    LILLARD, HS
    THOMSON, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1983, 46 (09) : 781 - 782